1 / 23

VDSL2

VDSL2. and the C559 review. Paul Brooks pbrooks@layer10.com.au. Timeline for xDSL. Feb 2006-2007. ADSL1 initially developed by AT&T/Bell Labs in 1989 to deliver video – predates the development of WWW. 2003-2007. 2002,2005-2007. 2003. 1999-2003. Why?. Agenda. DSL Redux ADSL 2+

kaden-bradshaw
Download Presentation

VDSL2

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. VDSL2 and the C559 review Paul Brooks pbrooks@layer10.com.au

  2. Timeline for xDSL Feb 2006-2007 ADSL1 initially developed by AT&T/Bell Labs in 1989 to deliver video – predates the development of WWW 2003-2007 2002,2005-2007 2003 1999-2003 AusNOG '07

  3. Why? AusNOG '07

  4. Agenda • DSL Redux • ADSL 2+ • VDSL2 compared • VDSL2+ Bandplans • VDSL2+ benchmarks • Bonding & Packet Transfer Mode • DSM – Dynamic Spectrum Management AusNOG '07

  5. 512 tones 25 tones upstream 473 tones downstream max ~60kbps per tone Frequency band up to 2.2 MHz ADSL2+ AusNOG '07

  6. Several Band-plans 7200+ tones (up to 30MHz) 3 upstream bands 2 or 3 downstream bands Same encoding and signalling per tone - ~ 60 kbps Frequency band up to 12/17/30 MHz VDSL2+ VDSL2 is effectively ADSL2+++++ AusNOG '07

  7. Its not as simple as ‘997 bandplans are more symmetric, 998 bandplans are more asymmetric….. Several Bandplans…(1) B8-4 is a 998 plan. B7-5 is a 997 plan B8-4 B7-5 B7-5 B8-4 Assumptions: 12 MHz band plans PIUT 40 revised No UPBO 9 x VDSL2 equal length (Example - C559 VDSL2 working group – benchmark illustration only!) AusNOG '07

  8. Annex A (US): 9 plans based on ‘Annex M’ ADSL2+ Several Bandplans…(2) • G.993.2 02/2006: • Annex B (Euro): 6 x ‘997’ plans and 7 x ‘998’ plans up to 12 MHz • Annex C (Japan): 1 band plan over ISDN, up to 30 MHz • Annexes D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K all “for further study” But wait…there’s more… AusNOG '07

  9. Annex A (US): 8 downstream x 11 upstream (some not compatible with each other) = ~80 plan variations, with max at 8/12/17/30 MHz Several Bandplans…(3) • G.993.2 Amendment 1 Nov 2006 draft: Exercise: Pick One (1) only bandplan for use throughout Australia • Annex B (Euro): 10 x ‘997’ plans and 16 x ‘998’ downstream plans up to 8/12/17/30 MHz • Annex C (Japan): 4 minor band plan variants, up to 30 MHz This VDSL2 stuff is very fresh! AusNOG '07

  10. Ob-Disclosure • Communications Alliance C559 Deployment Rules Review • Layer10 representing Preliminary information is from working drafts – subject to change before publication. AusNOG '07

  11. Multiple Bandplans don’t coexist • Frequencies that one line uses for upstream, and another line uses for downstream, interfere and destroy each other • Overall performance drops to lowest common denominator for both • Every service must use the same tones for upstream and downstream, without overlap • All must use the same bandplan AusNOG '07

  12. Bandplan Choice Chosen Bandplan isEuropean Annex B 998 Plan B8-11 to 17 MHz(from Amendment 1 still to be completed) • Little/No benefit to go to 30MHz, but 17 MHz provides good speed out to ~600m • 998 plan maximises downstream capacity for IPTV, Internet content downloads • Still retains good upstream (5-20 Mbps at 800m) – upstream capacity meets or beats eSHDSL symmetric services at all distances AusNOG '07

  13. VDSL2 Deployment Classes ADSL2+ Deployment Classes • 6h = ADSL2+ (Annex A) (unlimited distance) • 6j = ADSL2+ Annex M EU-40 • 6k = ADSL2+ Annex M EU-52 • 6l = ADSL2+ Annex M EU-56 • 6m = ADSL2+ Annex M EU-60 • 6n = ADSL2+ Annex M EU-64 VDSL2 Deployment Classes • 10h = VDSL2 • 10j = VDSL2 +Annex M EU-40 in US0 upstream • 10k = VDSL2 +Annex M EU-52 in US0 upstream • 10l = VDSL2 +Annex M EU-56 in US0 upstream • 10m = VDSL2 +Annex M EU-60 in US0 upstream • 10n = VDSL2 +Annex M EU-64 in US0 upstream NOT any of the further ‘Annex M-like’ EU-XX beyond EU-64 AusNOG '07

  14. VDSL2+ Benchmarks Benchmark: 10h modelled worst-case performance Preliminary Only – Do Not Rely On These! AusNOG '07

  15. /end C559 Back to ITU-T G.993.2… (but still subject to amendments!) AusNOG '07

  16. Other VDSL2 tricks • Bonding • 2 – 8 parallel VDSL2 services together, acting as a single channel (needs compatible CPE) • 80 Mbps upstream, 640 Mbps downstream anyone?  • Packet Transfer Mode (PTM) • Ethernet-in-the-first-mile (EFM) 802.3ah framing is supported natively • no more fiddling with ATM PVCs in the DSLAM or modem required • ~ 5% increased performance from reduced overheads AusNOG '07

  17. DSM Dynamic Spectrum Management • Adjusts transmit power in each line to time-variable external crosstalk, to optimise bandwidth for all lines in the binder by reducing cross-talk • No DSM (current situation) – assumes each line is greedy – worst-case modelling leads to conservative performance • DSM Level 1 – static spectrum shaping to avoid crosstalk – each line tries to optimise PSD shape and be polite in isolation • DSM Level 2 – dynamic spectrum shaping – each line talks to neighbours and all optimise PSD to try to be polite • DSM Level 3 – MIMO cross-talk cancellation – reverse crosstalk signal calculated and added in real-time to cancel out at the far end AusNOG '07

  18. DSM Level 2 • Algorithms developed fairly recently • Iterative Water-Filling (2002) • Optimal Spectrum Balancing (2004) • Iterative Spectrum Balancing (2005) • Autonomous Spectrum Balancing (2006) • Not available from DSLAM vendors currently, although some are preparing products and management systems to support DSM. AusNOG '07

  19. DSM Level 2 AusNOG '07

  20. DSM Level 3 • Full MIMO Crosstalk Cancellation • Ask Dr John Papandriopoulos…in about 3 – 5 years… AusNOG '07

  21. Wrapup “Its easy to offer 50Mbps access lines, if you know the top 40 Mbps will never be able to be used” Me. • Great access network speeds are one thing – be careful the backhaul can feed the access – or there is local-enough content to avoid using the backhaul AusNOG '07

  22. VDSL2 wont solve everything • Some problems will be made worse by VDSL2 AusNOG '07

  23. Thank you pbrooks@layer10.com.au www.layer10.com.au

More Related