1 / 20

BID Lunch, May 13, 2014 Pecha Kucha Style Presentation:

BID Lunch, May 13, 2014 Pecha Kucha Style Presentation:. Physically Correct Rendering of Pacioli’ s Rhombicuboctahedron. Carlo H. Séquin and Raymond Shiau University of California, Berkeley. “ Ritratto di Frà Luca Pacioli ” (1495). Museo e Gallerie di Capodimonte in Naples, Italy.

kaethe
Download Presentation

BID Lunch, May 13, 2014 Pecha Kucha Style Presentation:

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. BID Lunch, May 13, 2014PechaKucha Style Presentation: Physically Correct Rendering of Pacioli’s Rhombicuboctahedron Carlo H. Séquin and Raymond Shiau University of California, Berkeley

  2. “Ritratto di Frà Luca Pacioli” (1495) Museo e Gallerie di Capodimonte in Naples, Italy

  3. RCO = Rhombi-cuboctahedron • Archimedean solid: 8 triangles, 18 square faces RCO “Leonardo style”

  4. Praise of the Pacioli RCO • … a masterpiece of reflection, refraction, and perspective.[George Hart] • Its surface reflects a view out an open window, showing the Palazzo Ducale in Urbino.[Margaret Davis]

  5. How Accurate Is the Rendering ? • … do the reflections show that the window is high up towards the left? Or rather towards the bottom right? Both do not really make sense. • … the way the images are formed doesn’t seem very realistic at all.[Joost Rekveld]

  6. Comparison to a Physical Model Model by Claude Boehringer -- quite different surroundings.

  7. Do a Computer Graphics Rendering! Which of these pictures is correct? There are many parameters to adjust! Difficulties with the glass/water interface.

  8. Matching the Viewing Geometry Front view Side view

  9. Depicting Surface Reflections 0° 170° 146° A line reflected across a non-flat dihedral angle results in a “sheared” discontinuity.  Pasted-on rectangular “sticker” is wrong!

  10. Simple Refraction in Water Painting no refraction with refraction  Painter did not observe any refraction!(probably did not have a water-filled model)

  11. Multiple Refraction- & Mirror-Events M=1 R=2 M • Limiting the depth of the ray-trace tree: M=1 M=8R=2 R=8 >3R

  12. Glass / Water Interface view Water half-cube behind glass half-cube water/gap/glasswater/glass (fused)

  13. Water Half-cube behind Glass Half-cube Tracing ray-bundles Properly fused interface

  14. Water Half-cube behind Glass Half-cube Ray-bundles Properly fused interface Ray-bundles

  15. The Complete RCO The various materials and interfaces:Opaque filler (O), Water (W), Glass (G), G/W-interface (I)

  16. Modeling the Whole RCO M=1 R=3

  17. Modeling the Whole RCO R=4 M=1, R=4

  18. Modeling the Whole RCO M=1, R=6 M=R=10 (max) = “ground truth” ?

  19. RCO in Pacioli’s Room Slightly exaggerated tinting Set-up

  20. Final Comparison 1495 Painting 2014 Computer Rendering

More Related