360 likes | 571 Views
Using Registry data to drive improvement - what makes clinicians take note of statistics . Understanding Variation. Tom Marshall Department of Public Health & Epidemiology, University of Birmingham T.P.Marshall@bham.ac.uk. Acknowledgements. Mohammed A. Mohammed,
E N D
Using Registry data to drive improvement - what makes clinicians take note of statistics UnderstandingVariation Tom Marshall Department of Public Health & Epidemiology, University of Birmingham T.P.Marshall@bham.ac.uk
Acknowledgements Mohammed A. Mohammed, Department of Public Health & Epidemiology, University of Birmingham
Quality & Variation • Conventional tools • Standard setting • Clinical Audit • Ranking or League tables • Hypothesis testing • Effect • Pass or fail • Action on those thatfail • Another way ..
PROCESS OF WRITING Shewhart’s Concepts • Letter a SPECIAL CAUSE ACTION: FIND & ELIMINATE COMMON CAUSE ACTION: PROCESS
Basis of Control Limits • Tchebycheff’s theorem X mean +/- t SD P > 1 - 1/t2 • t=3 • Economic • common cause vs special cause
Special cause variation - action • Data • Accuracy • Definition of errors • Raw materials • Difficulty of tasks • Equipment, facilities, staffing • Typewriters, workload, lighting • Processes, procedures • How is the work organised? • People • Skill levels and techniques
Application to Health Care • Case studies
Surgeon Variability • Surgeon Survived Died % • A 82 16 16 • B 58 8 12 • C 49 9 16 • D 45 7 13 • E 37 15 29 • F 41 5 11 • G 35 3 8 • H 26 11 30 • I 31 5 14 • J 27 7 21 • K 28 4 13 • L 19 2 10 • M 18 3 14 McArdle & Hole BMJ 1991;302:1501-5
Surgeon Variability McArdle & Hole BMJ 1991;302:1501-5
Fractured Hips • 90 day mortality (N=580; 104 deaths 18%) • Hospital Mortality • 1 19/79 24% • 2 5/24 21% • 3 16/79 20% • 4 19/80 24% • 5 12/80 15% • 6 4/81 5% • 7 14/79 18% • 8 15/63 19% Todd et al BMJ 1995;301:904-8
Fractured Hips Todd et al BMJ 1995;301:904-8
Western Electric Company Rules • Additional rules for detecting special causes • 1 data point >3 sigma from mean • 2 out of 3 data points >2 sigma from mean • 4 out of 5 data points >1 sigma from mean • 9 successive data points on one side of mean • Trend of 6 successive data points
Special cause variation: nine successive data points below the mean
Renal Registry Data • Average haemoglobin per quarter
Trend of 6 data points Run Chart – sequential data points + mean
Interpretation • Rising trend in mean Hb nationally • Difficult to interpret changing Hb in a single centre except in relation to rising trend nationally
Consistent with national average 9 data points above mean i.e. own long term average Below national average 10 data points below mean
9 data points above mean Average determined from first 8 data points Run Chart – difference between this centre + UK Average
Consistent with two stable processes: before Sept 04& after Sept 04
Special cause variation - action 1. Data (including definitions) 2. Raw materials (case-mix) 3. Equipment, facilities, staffing 4. Processes, procedures 5. People
“The central problem in management and leadership …is failure to understand the information in variation” William E Deming 1986 Out of the Crisis MIT pg 309
Summary • Shewhart’s concepts • Understand variation • Simple & powerful • Guide action • Wide application • Continual improvement • Clinical governance • Other implications ..
Implications • Prediction • Limits of common cause variation • Statistical control • Action • Common cause variation • League tables, ranking, hypothesis testing all misleading • Improve process/system as a whole • Special cause variation • Investigate and eliminate (or learn lessons) • Data order important
How It Works In Industry • Balanced set of measures
Balanced Set Of Measures Customer Aim Internal External Financial Four or five measures for each box
Balanced Set Of Measures Patient Experience Strategic Effectiveness Clinical effectiveness Aim Financial / Resources
Special Causes • Identify special causes in each domain • Collate & prioritise for action • Low hanging fruit first