1 / 36

Tom Marshall Department of Public Health & Epidemiology, University of Birmingham T.P.Marshall@bham.ac.uk

Using Registry data to drive improvement - what makes clinicians take note of statistics . Understanding Variation. Tom Marshall Department of Public Health & Epidemiology, University of Birmingham T.P.Marshall@bham.ac.uk. Acknowledgements. Mohammed A. Mohammed,

kail
Download Presentation

Tom Marshall Department of Public Health & Epidemiology, University of Birmingham T.P.Marshall@bham.ac.uk

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Using Registry data to drive improvement - what makes clinicians take note of statistics UnderstandingVariation Tom Marshall Department of Public Health & Epidemiology, University of Birmingham T.P.Marshall@bham.ac.uk

  2. Acknowledgements Mohammed A. Mohammed, Department of Public Health & Epidemiology, University of Birmingham

  3. Quality & Variation • Conventional tools • Standard setting • Clinical Audit • Ranking or League tables • Hypothesis testing • Effect • Pass or fail • Action on those thatfail • Another way ..

  4. PROCESS OF WRITING Shewhart’s Concepts • Letter a SPECIAL CAUSE ACTION: FIND & ELIMINATE COMMON CAUSE ACTION: PROCESS

  5. Basis of Control Limits • Tchebycheff’s theorem X mean +/- t SD P > 1 - 1/t2 • t=3 • Economic • common cause vs special cause

  6. Special cause variation - action • Data • Accuracy • Definition of errors • Raw materials • Difficulty of tasks • Equipment, facilities, staffing • Typewriters, workload, lighting • Processes, procedures • How is the work organised? • People • Skill levels and techniques

  7. Application to Health Care • Case studies

  8. Surgeon Variability • Surgeon Survived Died % • A 82 16 16 • B 58 8 12 • C 49 9 16 • D 45 7 13 • E 37 15 29 • F 41 5 11 • G 35 3 8 • H 26 11 30 • I 31 5 14 • J 27 7 21 • K 28 4 13 • L 19 2 10 • M 18 3 14 McArdle & Hole BMJ 1991;302:1501-5

  9. Surgeon Variability McArdle & Hole BMJ 1991;302:1501-5

  10. Fractured Hips • 90 day mortality (N=580; 104 deaths 18%) • Hospital Mortality • 1 19/79 24% • 2 5/24 21% • 3 16/79 20% • 4 19/80 24% • 5 12/80 15% • 6 4/81 5% • 7 14/79 18% • 8 15/63 19% Todd et al BMJ 1995;301:904-8

  11. Fractured Hips Todd et al BMJ 1995;301:904-8

  12. Western Electric Company Rules • Additional rules for detecting special causes • 1 data point >3 sigma from mean • 2 out of 3 data points >2 sigma from mean • 4 out of 5 data points >1 sigma from mean • 9 successive data points on one side of mean • Trend of 6 successive data points

  13. Special cause variation: nine successive data points below the mean

  14. Renal Registry Data • Average haemoglobin per quarter

  15. Trend of 6 data points Run Chart – sequential data points + mean

  16. Interpretation • Rising trend in mean Hb nationally • Difficult to interpret changing Hb in a single centre except in relation to rising trend nationally

  17. Consistent with national average 9 data points above mean i.e. own long term average Below national average 10 data points below mean

  18. 9 data points above mean Average determined from first 8 data points Run Chart – difference between this centre + UK Average

  19. Control Chart – Run Chart + 3 sigma limits

  20. Consistent with two stable processes: before Sept 04& after Sept 04

  21. Special cause variation - action 1. Data (including definitions) 2. Raw materials (case-mix) 3. Equipment, facilities, staffing 4. Processes, procedures 5. People

  22. Monitoring Many Centres

  23. Walter A Shewhart 1931

  24. “The central problem in management and leadership …is failure to understand the information in variation” William E Deming 1986 Out of the Crisis MIT pg 309

  25. Summary • Shewhart’s concepts • Understand variation • Simple & powerful • Guide action • Wide application • Continual improvement • Clinical governance • Other implications ..

  26. Implications • Prediction • Limits of common cause variation • Statistical control • Action • Common cause variation • League tables, ranking, hypothesis testing all misleading • Improve process/system as a whole • Special cause variation • Investigate and eliminate (or learn lessons) • Data order important

  27. How It Works In Industry • Balanced set of measures

  28. Balanced Set Of Measures Customer Aim Internal External Financial Four or five measures for each box

  29. Balanced Set Of Measures Patient Experience Strategic Effectiveness Clinical effectiveness Aim Financial / Resources

  30. Special Causes • Identify special causes in each domain • Collate & prioritise for action • Low hanging fruit first

More Related