140 likes | 273 Views
FrontPage : Do you believe that the way money is used in baseball is fair? Should it be?. Homework : Influences on Voters RQs due Thursday. “MoneyBall”. Do you believe that the way money is used in baseball is fair? If not, should it be?. Money. and Politics.
E N D
FrontPage: Do you believe that the way money is used in baseball is fair? Should it be? Homework: Influences on Voters RQs due Thursday
“MoneyBall” • Do you believe that the way money is used in baseball is fair? • If not, should it be?
Money and Politics
Money in politics: a “necessary evil?” • The goal of any campaign is, of course, to win the election. • What must a candidate do to win? • Do candidates really need money to do this? • What does this money buy for the candidate?
Raising Money for the Campaigns • Where do candidates get money? • Individuals – more often the largest source of donations for challengers; depends on the candidate • PACs – committees/groups whose sole purpose is to raise and spend money on campaigns • Personal finances – candidates can loan themselves money to run • Public financing – presidential candidates can opt to take public money, but then they are limited in how much their own campaign can spend
Limits on Spending? • Do you believe that government has the right to limit how much someone could spend in support of a candidate? Why or why not? • What law (2002) was passed by Congress to limit spending in campaigns?
Current Campaign Donation Limits Contribution limits are adjusted for inflation each odd-numbered year
McConnell vs. FEC • Soon after the BCRA was passed, it was challenged in the Supreme Court by then Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell… • What do you think the supporters of the law would claim in defense of it? • In a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court upheld most of the BCRA’s limitations on spending. • Ban on “soft” money = constitutional • Limits on “issue” ads = constitutional • New contribution limits = constitutional • Ban on contribs by minors = unconstitutional
Citizens United vs. FEC • A historic 2010 Supreme Court case/decision • Citizens United is a non-profit group • describes its mission as being dedicated to restoring the United States government to "citizens' control" and to "assert American values of limited government, freedom of enterprise, strong families, and national sovereignty and security." To fulfill this mission, Citizens United undertakes various educational projects, including television advertising and feature-length documentaries • Created a movie called “Hillary: The Movie” • Was blocked by the BCRA from being shown up to 30 days before a Democratic primary election. • Barred because it was considered “express advocacy”, in this case against a candidate • Citizens United sued, claiming that they have a First Amendment right to create and air a movie anytime
The Decision in Citizens United • By a 5-to-4 vote along ideological lines, the majority held that under the First Amendment, corporate/private funding of independent political broadcasts in candidate elections cannot be limited. • One of the results of this decision (in addition to a case called SpeechNow.org vs. FEC) was the creation of…
Super-PACs • New groups that have popped up in the wake of the Citizens United decision • This decision essentially said that any group can spend as much as it wants to influence any election, as long as it was not “coordinated” with a campaign • Unlike PACs, which are limited in how much they can give to a candidate, Super-PACs don’t give money to candidates • Would be better named “Super 527s” • They are more concerned with influencing the outcome of elections, through issue ads and other methods used to influence voters.
Money And Politics • Certainly the impact of money and campaigns is at least a “mixed bag”. Next it will be our job to investigate just how much money we are talking about. • All in all, we should begin to form an opinion about how we can most effectively deal with the “necessary evil” that money seems to be in the electoral process…