1 / 39

The Work of the European Agency and a European Perspective on Inclusive Education

The Work of the European Agency and a European Perspective on Inclusive Education. Cor Meijer (PhD), director www.european-agency.org. The Agency. 14th year of operations Main secretariat in Odense, Denmark and European Liaison office in Brussels, Belgium. Funding.

kaili
Download Presentation

The Work of the European Agency and a European Perspective on Inclusive Education

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Work of the European Agency and a European Perspective on Inclusive Education Cor Meijer (PhD), director www.european-agency.org

  2. The Agency • 14th year of operations • Main secretariat in Odense, Denmark and European Liaison office in Brussels, Belgium

  3. Funding The Agency is financed by: • The member countries’ Ministries of Education • European Commission as one of the 6 organisations supported by the Lifelong Learning Programme

  4. Member countries of the Agency • Presently, the Agency has 27 full member countries: Austria, Belgium (French), Belgium (Flemish), Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom (England, Scotland, Northern Ireland and Wales).

  5. The Agency’s Mission • Member countries’ platform for collaboration in the field of special needs education (SNE) • Our ultimate aim is to improve educational policy and practice for learners with special educational needs

  6. The Agency’s Activities • Collection, analysis and dissemination of information on priority themes • Participation and organisation of conferences, seminars and political events • Liaison with the European institutions and international organisations – OECD, UNESCO

  7. Agency Information Resources The Agency offers various information resources, which can all be accessed via the website www.european-agency.org • Thematic Reports • Thematic Databases • Newsletters and Electronic Bulletin Agency publications can be downloaded in up to 21 member languages

  8. Some working parameters • Countries are at different starting points and have different ‘histories’ – we need to account for that and see it as a strength • No-one has all the answers – countries have clear examples of good practice, but all countries are still ‘moving ahead’

  9. International Policy Context for SNE • UNESCO Salamanca Statement and Framework for Action in Special Needs Education (1994) • UN Convention on Rights of People with Disabilities (2006)

  10. Selection of Past Agency Priority Themes • Early Childhood Intervention • Provision of special needs education • Financing and inclusion • Transition from school to working life • Classroom Practice to support Inclusive Education • Assessment of learners with Special Educational Needs • Immigrants and Special Needs

  11. Current Agency Work - 2013 • New Priority themes • Teacher Education for Inclusion • Organisation of Provision for SNE • Vocational Education - policy and practice in the field of SNE • Inclusive Education in Action (IEA) • Information Provision • Qualitative and quantitative indicators • Key Principles for policy and practice • Higher Education Accessibility Guide

  12. IEA – Starting Points • Partners: • European Agency for Development in Special Needs Education • UNESCO/UNESCO-IBE • GPDD joined the work in 2010 • Duration of the project: • 1st November 2009 to 31st October 2010 (12 months) • Subcontractor: • Institut für Technologie und Arbeit (ITA), Germany

  13. IEA - Goal • The starting point for the project was the UNESCO Policy Guidelines on Inclusion in Education, which consider in detail how the ‘policy cycle’ for inclusive education can be supported • The IEA project web-site presents examples of policy and practice for inclusive education that exemplify the Suggested Actions listed in the Policy Guidelines document

  14. Progress to date…. • The web-site was launched on 1st September 2010 to coincide with GPDD’s involvement in the UN side event relating to the CRPD • Project information has been presented at a number of key events across Europe • The Project Framework and Rationale and glossary are available from the web-site http://www.inclusive-education-in-action.org • Over 40 world-wide examples are now on the website, with others currently being processed

  15. Project Developments The use of the IEA website is growing steadily but in order to fully exploit the potential of the project we need to: - collect examples covering all of the suggested actions for the Policy Guidelines - provide information in multi-lingual formats (the 6 official languages of UNESCO as a minimum) - develop the website to accommodate a wider range of examples in different formats

  16. Project development In order to achieve our goals we need resources for: - Translation - Networking with other key organisations to provide a comprehensive resource for policy makers worldwide - Technically enhancing the website

  17. Teacher Education for Inclusion Key questions: • What kind of teachers do we need for an inclusive society in a 21st century school? • What are the essential teacher competences for inclusive education? Essential Focus • The training of mainstream, general teachers and how they are prepared to work in inclusive settings • The initial training phase as a priority

  18. Special Events • European Parliament Hearing in Brussels 2003 • Portuguese Parliament Hearing in Lisbon 2007 • European Parliament Hearing in Brussels 2011

  19. European Hearing in Portugal European Hearing of Young People with Special Educational Needs organised by the Portuguese Ministry of Education and the Agency. The event took place in Lisbon within the framework of the Portuguese Presidency of the European Union and the European Year of Equal Opportunities.

  20. European Hearing in Portugal • The Lisbon Declaration ‘Young People’s Views on Inclusive Education’ is the main result of this event. • We see a lot of benefits in inclusive education: we acquire more social skills; we live more experiences; we learn about how to manage in the real world; we need to have and interact with friends with and without special needs. • Inclusive education is mutually beneficial to us and to the others

  21. UN convention on the rights of people with disabilities (2006) – Article 24 - Education States parties are requested to ensure an inclusive education system at all levels 147 signatories to the Convention 90 signatories to the Optional Protocol 99 ratifications of the Convention 61 ratifications of the Optional Protocol

  22. Ratification of the optional protocol by European Agency member countries • Austria - 26 September 2008 • Belgium – 2 July 2009 • France - 18 February 2010 • Germany - 24 February 2009 • Hungary - 20 July 2007 • Italy – 15 May 2009 • Latvia – 31 August 2010 • Lithuania – 18 August 2010 • Portugal – 23 September 2009 • Slovenia - 24 April 2008 • Spain - 3 December 2007 • Sweden - 15 December 2008 • United Kingdom – 7 August 2009

  23. Map of signatures and ratifications, 07.03.2011

  24. Social Cohesion and Inclusive Education • Key Questions • Normative position? • Role of research?

  25. In promoting friendship and loyalty, and in safeguarding the commitment to freedom and peace requires….…that children be exposed to ideas from many different backgrounds and perspectives. Basic education is not just an arrangement for training to develop skills; it is also a recognition of the diversity and richness of the world, an appreciation of the importance of freedom as well as friendship. The need for that understanding – that vision- has never been stronger. (Sen, 2004)

  26. Percentage of pupils in the compulsory school sector recognised as having SEN in 2010 (in all educational settings)

  27. Percentage of pupils with SEN in segregated settings

  28. Factors related to differences between and within countries • Funding • Population density

  29. Financing Funding explains differences on segration-integration continuum Funding explains differences between policies and practices Funding changes may contribute to development of inclusive practices

  30. More in detail • Input funding: negative consequences • Throughput funding: positive results • Pupil bound budgets: disadvantages

  31. Developments in Europe Developments • A wider range and more flexible provision • Developing funding models • The development of resource centres   Challenges • Academic achievements (output) versus SEN • Secondary and higher education • 2% of pupils in separate settings across Europe • Preparing all teachers for inclusive education

  32. Inclusive Education and Classroom Practice What works within inclusive settings? How inclusive education works? Why it is working?

  33. Some general conclusions • What is good for pupils with special educational needs is good for all pupils • Behaviour, social and/or emotional problems are the most challenging • Dealing with differences in the classroom forms one of the biggest problems

  34. Effective practices within the context of inclusive education • Co-operative teaching • Teachers need support from colleagues • Students get their support in the classroom • Teachers learn from each others’ approaches and feedback. Thus, it also meets the needs of teachers

  35. Effective practices within the context of inclusive education Co-operative learning • Peer tutoring is effective in both cognitive and affective areas • Moreover, there are no indications that the more able pupil suffers from this situation

  36. Effective practices within the context of inclusive education Heterogeneous grouping • Students of the same age stay together in mixed ability classrooms, to respect natural variability in characteristics of students. • Heterogeneous grouping is effective when dealing with a diversity of pupils in the classroom

  37. We deal with differences! Climb the tree!

  38. Contact Us www.european-agency.org European Agency for Development in Special Needs Education Østre Stationsvej 33 DK-5000 Odense C Denmark Phone: +45 64 41 00 20 secretariat@european-agency.org

More Related