1 / 21

Engaging the Unengaged: Bio-contextualized Physics Lab

Engaging the Unengaged: Bio-contextualized Physics Lab. By Matthew Fleenor, Matthew Rearick, and DorothyBelle Poli Roanoke College. What motivated your project?. “Why do I have to take physics?”. Motivation: Why did we work together?. New integrative general education curriculum

kaiser
Download Presentation

Engaging the Unengaged: Bio-contextualized Physics Lab

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Engaging the Unengaged: Bio-contextualized Physics Lab By Matthew Fleenor, Matthew Rearick, and DorothyBelle Poli Roanoke College

  2. What motivated your project? “Why do I have to take physics?”

  3. Motivation: Why did we work together? • New integrative general education curriculum • FIPSE grant to provide sustainable faculty development for integrative teaching and learning

  4. What we wanted to achieve! “Why do I have to take physics?” • Objective: To renovate the required 100-level laboratories so students would observe and experience the deep connections between physics and biology

  5. Goals • Demonstrate an increased level of understanding (physics, integration of fields, writing skills). • Technical Laboratory Skills • Student engagement

  6. Course Structure • Traditional physics lab exercises with: • Bio-application lecture/conversations • Complete biophysics lab exercise • Weekly follow-up wiki • Integrative Activities • Quantitative problems

  7. Course Structure • Traditional physics lab exercises with: • Bio-application lecture/conversations • Complete biophysics lab exercise • Weekly follow-up wiki • Integrative Activities • Quantitative problems

  8. Course Structure • Traditional physics lab exercises with: • Bio-application lecture/conversations • Complete biophysics lab exercise • Weekly follow-up wiki • Integrative Activities • Quantitative problems

  9. Course Structure • Traditional physics lab exercises with: • Bio-application lecture/conversations • Complete biophysics lab exercise • Weekly follow-up wiki • Integrative Activities • Quantitative problems

  10. Course Structure

  11. Course Structure • Traditional physics lab exercises with: • Bio-application lecture/conversations • Complete biophysics lab exercise • Weekly follow-up wiki • Integrative Activities • Quantitative problems

  12. Course Structure • Traditional physics lab exercises with: • Bio-application lecture/conversations • Complete biophysics lab exercise • Weekly follow-up wiki • Integrative Activities • Quantitative problems

  13. Questions?

  14. To what extent did we achieve our goals? • Demonstrate an increased level of understanding (physics, integration of fields, writing skills). - understanding of physics and writing take long amounts of time to alter (NO)‏ - biology/physics integration occurs on a faster time-scale (YES)‏ • Technical Laboratory Skills - difficult to assess across all sections (NO)‏ - showed marked increase throughout semester, but true of all sections? (YES)‏ • Student engagement - interests were heightened (YES)‏

  15. How do we know? What measures were used? • Demonstrate an increased level of understanding (physics, integration of fields, writing skills). - Final grades did not show noticeable elevation - pre-/post-test for mechanics concepts was also flat - poor response rate on college-wide evaluations - post-essay did show better integration, but not skills • Technical Laboratory Skills - difficult to assess (+ within other sections)‏ - showed marked increase throughout semester based on grades (due to small class; norm for labs)‏ • Student engagement - personalized evaluative data (compared to what?)‏

  16. What will we offer in the future? • Permanent materials - pre-lab questions - post-lab extension questions - portable exercises already developed • Emphasis on writing and integrative activities - importance of writing (across all sections)‏ - formal individual and group integrative projects • Student engagement - how much will be lost when collaborators are not in the classroom - expertise will not be readily available

  17. Questions?

  18. What institutional support was most helpful? • Overarching theme & purpose of the Grant • Grant personnel • Excuse to experiment • Very open to ideas (freedom to fail) • Ahhh …. Lunch! (with minimal agenda) • Different pedagogies … any and all things teaching (vent, yes; support, yes; problem-solving, yes …) • Impacted not just this course sequence but other classes as well (at least mine) • Dean & Chairs (3 departments)

  19. Advice for Similar Faculty Projects • Model • … our setup/model (1 + support grp), our disciplinary diversity and our academic “age” • Challenges – • Support • Dean & Chair (everybody happy until …) • TCU’s … justifying time, etc. • Qualifying thought: Feasibility of our model • Immediate and long term rewards/compensation? • Making this work for …. • professional dev./tenure interests • student evals? – remember, it’s a group effort

  20. Advice for Similar Faculty Projects • Reminders • a priori discussion on … • Classroom responsibility and work/effort accountability • Growth as Teachers • Willingness to grow, be wrong and, most likely, you are better (or worse) than you think • Realistic Expectations • It will not be perfect to start … IMPROVE the educational experience for students, no more, no less • Be Transparent • Openness with Chairs

  21. Thank You! • Questions? Matt Fleenor (Physics) fleenor@roanoke.edu Matt Rearick (HHP) rearick@roanoke.edu DB Poli (Biology) poli@roanoke.edu

More Related