110 likes | 187 Views
SeaWinds IMUDH Flag Choice. Bryan Stiles Jan.17, 2006. Candidates. All candidates use the same MUDH table computed from > 2m/s speed impact (negative speed impacts not flagged) OR > 15 degrees direction Candidate 1: 1.7% flagged Inner 51% misdetection Outer 55% misdetection
E N D
SeaWinds IMUDH Flag Choice Bryan Stiles Jan.17, 2006
Candidates • All candidates use the same MUDH table computed from > 2m/s speed impact (negative speed impacts not flagged) OR > 15 degrees direction • Candidate 1: 1.7% flagged • Inner 51% misdetection • Outer 55% misdetection • Candidate 2: 1.9% flagged CHOSEN CANDIDATE • Inner 48% misdetection • Outer 52% misdetection • Candidate 3: 2.3% flagged • Inner 43% misdetection • Outer 47% misdetection • Candidate 4: 3.2% flagged • Inner 35% misdetection • Outer 35% misdetection
Flag Category Plots • The following slides present performance metrics as a function of flag category and wind speed range • Flag category • Category 1: Flagged by 1.7% candidate • Category 2: Flagged by 1.9% but not 1.7% • Category 3: Flagged by 2.3% but not 1.9% • Category 4: Flagged by 3.2% but not 2.3% • Category 5: Not Flagged by 3.2% candidate