1 / 17

Twelve Month Follow-Up of Mothers from the

Twelve Month Follow-Up of Mothers from the ‘Child Protection and Mothers in Substance Abuse Treatment Study’. Stephanie Taplin PhD , Rachel Grove & Richard P. Mattick PhD. Association of Child Welfare Agencies Conference 2012. Background to the study.

kalb
Download Presentation

Twelve Month Follow-Up of Mothers from the

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Twelve Month Follow-Up of Mothers from the ‘Child Protection and Mothers in Substance Abuse Treatment Study’ Stephanie Taplin PhD , Rachel Grove & Richard P. Mattick PhD Association of Child Welfare Agencies Conference 2012

  2. Background to the study ‘Child protection and mothers in substance abuse treatment’ study Funded by NSW Community Services, National Drug & Alcohol Research Centre & University of NSW (2007-2010) and NSW Health (2011-12) • Major aim: To compare mothers in opioid treatment involved with child protection with those not. • And: To describe their characteristics, parenting, children, and interventions.

  3. Why recruit women on the OTP? Large numbers on OTP [6,442 women 2010] Around half all AOD treatment entries have children; most women entering treatment are mothers of dependent children To recruit mothers not known to child protection Child protection concerns re heroin use & parenting OTP allows parents to continue caring for their children

  4. Methods Women on OTP with a child < 16 yrs Recruited through nine public and private OTP clinics across Sydney 171 women interviewed May 2009 to May 2010 Estimated 59% response rate Consent obtained to access treatment and Community Services records (up to 12 months after interview)

  5. Sample demographics

  6. Major risk factors

  7. Women’s child protection involvement * At least one child in care and/or investigation/service within previous 6 months [Grella, Hser & Huang (2006)]

  8. Major research question Are mothers in drug treatment services who are involved with child protection services different in terms of parenting and other characteristics to those mothers who are not involved?

  9. Areas tested: Comparing mothers currently involved with CP versus those not Age; age first birth; number children Schooling; income; financial problems Aboriginality Mental health; domestic violence Own abuse & criminal history Social supports Drug treatment & heroin use history Recent substance use

  10. Significant in bivariate analyses: factors associated with child protection involvement (p < 0.01) Lower level of schooling (< Year 12) No driver’s licence Greater number of children Criminality: recent trouble with police and having a prison history Lack of social supports: irregular contact with parents and not being able to get help when needed Extensive substance use history: more AOD treatments, younger age first AOD treatment, and younger age first heroin use.

  11. Significant variables in logistic regression model * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01

  12. Follow-up study • Twelve month follow-up via child protection records of consenting women • Analysis of predictors of child protection involvement after 12 months • Descriptive analyses: new births, CP interventions, removals, reunifications • CP records of 78 women were accessed.

  13. Logistic regression analyses at 12 mths • Instability in the model so results not presented here. • Reasons: (1) non-random sample (over-representation of CP and previously significant variables) (2) small sample size • Does not mean there is no association.

  14. Other findings over 12 mths • 62 children were still in OOHC at 12 mths (41 in kinship care) • 30 children reported to child protection • 15 families reported for ‘drug abuse by carer’ • Two women had older children removed • Children of 4 women in OOHC at interview were being restored

  15. New births over 12 mths • Six of the 78 women had new babies. • All six were reported to child protection for ‘drug abuse by carer’. • Five were reported prenatally • Four babies had been removed from their mother’s care at birth or within a few months of their birth.

  16. Conclusions from the study Multiple problems and disadvantages experienced by most women in sample High level of child protection involvement – long term care and new births Rather than severity of substance use, other factors are of greater importance in child protection involvement Opportunity in treatment to better address women’s needs and prevent future problems for them and their children

  17. Link to main study report Taplin, S. and Mattick, R. (2011) Child Protection and Mothers in Substance Abuse Treatment, Sydney: National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre. http://ndarc.med.unsw.edu.au/resource/child-protection-and-mothers-substance-abuse-treatment Contact: Dr Stephanie Taplin, Associate Director (from 14 Institute of Child Protection Studies August) Australian Catholic University stephanie.taplin@acu.edu.au

More Related