Conclusions

1. Conclusions David Reinkensmeyer Paolo Bonato Michael Boninger Leighton Chan Rachel Cowan Mary Rodgers BJ Fregly

2. Thank you • Cisanello Hospital • Smartex and University of Pisa • ScuolaSuperioreSant’Anna • Auxilim Vitae Volterra • University of Genoa • Rizzoli Institute • University of Bologna • ETH Zurich • ZAR and Balgrist Hospital • Hocoma AG • University of Twente • Roessingh Rehabilitation and Development • MIRA • Baat Medical • Demcon Advanced Mechatronics • Xsens Technologies • Delft University of Technology • Instituto de Automatica Industrial, Madrid • U. Paris Descartes, GarchesHoptial • MounirMokhtari, Institute Telecom • University of Aalborg • Laboratoire de Biomecanique, Paris Arts and Metiers • Institut des SystèmesIntelligents et de Robotique • Imperial College London • Cambridge University • TRIL • Fraunhofer Institute, Berlin • Charite Hospital, Berlin

3. Grand Challenges • Integrating neuroscience and theory to inform • Therapeutic technology innovation • Combinations of mobility technology with biologics • Clinically useful, predictive, wholistic human models • Transparent technology • reliable unobtrusive sensors and exoskeletons • Training the next generation of researchers • Multidisciplinary interactive team players • Meaningfully involvement of individuals with mobility impairment at all roles and stages • Technology for resource poor environments • A worry free European vacation