60 likes | 285 Views
Larynx and Hypopharynx Overall Survival. Hazard Ratio 0.62 (0.41-0.94) P = .024. 166 Patients. Larynx and Hypopharynx OS and PFS. OS “Operable” Hypopharynx and Larynx Patients. Hazard Ratio 0.67 (0.41-1.11) P = 0.12. 123 Patients. LFS in the Operable Patient Population.
E N D
Larynx and Hypopharynx Overall Survival Hazard Ratio 0.62 (0.41-0.94) P = .024 166 Patients
OS “Operable” Hypopharynx and Larynx Patients Hazard Ratio 0.67 (0.41-1.11) P = 0.12 123 Patients
LFS in the Operable Patient Population Hazard Ratio 0.59 (0.37-0.95) P = .03
TAX 324 – Larynx and HypopharynxConclusions • Sequential Therapy with TPF Significantly Improves Survival in Advanced Larynx and Hypopharynx Cancer • TPF Reduces Mortality by 38% Compared to PF, p = .02 • Sequential Therapy with TPF Significantly Improves PFS in Advanced Larynx and Hypopharynx Cancer • TPF Improves PFS by 34% Compared to PF, p = .03 • TPF Reduces Surgery by 50%, p = .026 • TPF Reduces Primary Site Surgery
TAX 324 – Larynx and HypopharynxRational Speculation • Sequential Therapy With TPF Significantly Improves LFS in Operable Larynx and Hypopharynx Cancer Compared To PF, p = .03 • Since TPF Is Significantly Better Than PF, We Could Reasonably Expect TPF To Be Significantly Better Than Bolus Cisplatin-Based CRT • PF Is Equivalent To Bolus Cisplatin-Based CRT for LFS and Survival* • There Is A Significant Survival and LFS Advantage To TPF Compared to PF *Taylor, 1996, Forastiere, 2006; Lefebvre, 2007