1 / 6

Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)

Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: Why Use of Bad Channels Should Be Optional Date Submitted: 12 November 2001 Source: Greg Ellard , Vitaliy Sapozhnykov, HongBing Gan, Bijan Treister, Efstratios Skafidas Bandspeed Inc.

kamal-becker
Download Presentation

Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: Why Use of Bad Channels Should Be Optional Date Submitted: 12 November 2001 Source: Greg Ellard , Vitaliy Sapozhnykov, HongBing Gan, Bijan Treister, Efstratios Skafidas Bandspeed Inc. AddressLevel 9, 500 Collins St., Melbourne 3000, Victoria, Australia Voice:+61 3 9614 6299 FAX: +61 3 9614 6699 E-Mail:{v.sapozhnykov, h.gan, b.treister, e.skafidas}@bandspeed.com.au gellard@bandspeed.com Re: [] Abstract: Motion to make use of bad channels optional and supporting reasons why bad channels should not be present in the adapted hop sequence are provided Purpose: Provide the motion and for presentation. Notice: This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P802.15. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by P802.15.

  2. Why Intelligent Use of Bad Channels (Partition Sequence Generator) should be Optional

  3. AFH Proposal Structure Partition Sequence Generator If there are Kept Bad Channels (BK) Optional Legacy Hop Selection Kernel Frequency Re-Mapper (AFH Post Processing) Master’s CLK Master’s Address Channel Condition (Good, Bad)

  4. Why Partition Sequence should be Optional (1) • FCC NPRM and world wide regulations permit use as less as 15 channels. • Bad channel usage applies when the number of good channel NG is less than 15. Very rare scenarios • If NG < 15, theoretical benefits of intelligent use of bad channels is trivial. • But in practice, if NG < 15, making a connection is extremely difficult, let alone implementing AFH.

  5. Why Partition Sequence should be Optional (2) • Not compatible with Bluetooth SIG AFH mechanism. • Not compatible with legacy devices. • Not beneficial for broadcast, Piconet synchronization, park mode, sniff mode, etc. • Not supporting mixed data and voice link (ACL+SCO). • Extra gates, extra time, minimal benefits

  6. Making ‘Intelligent Use of Bad channels_ (Partition Sequence Generator)’ OPTIONAL Benefits Bluetooth SIG, IEEE 802.15.2 and Industry

More Related