1 / 12

NCEP SREF for the 2010 Christmas East Coast snowstorm

NCEP SREF for the 2010 Christmas East Coast snowstorm. Jun Du Mesoscale Modeling Branch/EMC/NCEP. (I) Initially under forecast for the east coast snowstorm in general (a mixture of model physics, IC quality and predictability issue).

kamal-wiggins
Download Presentation

NCEP SREF for the 2010 Christmas East Coast snowstorm

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. NCEP SREF for the 2010 Christmas East Coast snowstorm Jun Du Mesoscale Modeling Branch/EMC/NCEP

  2. (I) Initially under forecast for the east coast snowstorm in general(a mixture of model physics, IC quality and predictability issue)

  3. Problem: cyclone track forecasts were too to east of the observed track prior to Dec 25: e.g., 03z, Dec. 24, 2010 SREF mean forecast (84hr, Dan Petersen)

  4. Sensitivity of cyclonegenesis to initial condition e.g., 03z, Dec. 24, 2010 SREF individual members (one Eta_KF and one RSM members are very close to the observed)

  5. Sensitivity of cyclongenesis to initial condition, e.g., 03z, Dec. 24, 2010 SREF “bad” and “good” members (84hr) Bad Eta_KF member Good Eta_KF member Bad RSM member Good RSM member

  6. Consequently, the problem for precipitation is that the major precipitation is too far from the coast prior to Dec. 25, 2010: e.g. 03z and 09z, Dec 24, 2010 SREF >1” probability (Rich Grumm) 03z, 84hr 09z, 78hr

  7. Sensitivity of precipitation to initial condition: 03z, Dec. 24, 2010 SREF “bad” and “good” members Bad Eta_KF member Good Eta_KF member Bad RSM member Good RSM member

  8. (II) Over-forecast for Washington DC area(mainly predictability issue)

  9. SREF mean pcp (Geoff Manikin) 09z 12/25 03z 12/25 All means have > 0.50” in DC; LWX issued WS warning, partially based on this 15z 12/25 21z 12/25

  10. 25/03z 25/09z 25/15z SREF Prob 24hr Tot Pcp > 0.50”, valid 15z 12/27 (mean dashed) (Geoff Manikin) 25/21z 26/03z 26/09z Sharp gradient between 30 and 70% probability between Dulles and Chesapeake Bay

  11. Sensitivity of precipitation to IC: e.g. 09z, Dec 25, 2010 SREF – a range of solutions from “good” to “bad” members 0.1-0.25” 0.01-0.1” 1.0-1.5” 0.5-0.75”

  12. Summary • Predictability is definitely an issue for this storm, which is the reason why the EPS is so important in operation • Although physics deficiency and IC quality must play a role in the systematically biased forecasts prior to Dec. 25, 2010, the truth seems still lies within the SREF envelope (with low probability though) • After many years of “ensemble” era, people are, unfortunately, still looking for “yes or no” deterministic answers. It’s time to issue probabilistic forecasts such as this case for Washington DC: e.g., we should issue a forecast like this “20% chance of light snow (<1”), 50% chance of median snow (1-5”) and 30% chance of heavy snow (>10”)”. We need to change current forecast format

More Related