130 likes | 233 Views
Consejería de Medio Rural y Pesca. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MANAGING AUTHORITY AND PAYING AGENCY IN RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS 27TH Conference of Directors of EU Paying Agencies. 29th of april 2010 – Oviedo, Asturias. PREVIOUS BACKGROUND: SITUATION UP TO 1999.
E N D
Consejería de Medio Rural y Pesca RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MANAGING AUTHORITY AND PAYING AGENCY IN RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS 27TH Conference of Directors of EU Paying Agencies 29th of april 2010 – Oviedo, Asturias
Period 2007 -2013 • EAFRD: a single rural development fund for all territories and all the measures • Convergence of two management cultures, incorporating aspects from: • Structural funds: programming, pluriannual management (n+2), selection criteria, etc. • EAGGF-Guidance: Paying Agencies, clearance of accounts, etc. • National structures of management coming from the above two models are respected: Management Authority and Paying Agency, which should cooperate in the implementation of the programs
MAIN FIGURES • EAGF (2008): 43.000 M€ • EAFRD: • 2008 payments: 10.529 M€ • Annual average (2007-13 before HC): 12.975 M€ including national expenditure: 22.838 M€ • 92 RDP with very different budgets: in Spain varies from 44 M€ in Baleares to 1.881 M€ in Andalucia • Rate of the RDP in agricultural expenditure - graphics: ratio RDP (yearly average of total public expenses programmed before HC) / total agricultural expenses (EAGF 2008+average RDP)
ORGANIZATION SCHEME IN SPAIN • In the most frequent model, MA and PA are separate units integrated in the same administrative structure (Regional Ministry), with similar ranges (General Direction) • Other models also used: • Separate department: the MA is part of the Regional Finance Ministry and the PA is part of the Regional Agricultural Ministry • the MA depends hierarchically from the PA Direction • One unit accomplish the two tasks • It´s usual that the MA and/or the direction of the PA keep direct responsability over the management of some of the measures of the RDP