240 likes | 456 Views
MRAM initiative. Bob White, Department of ECE Jimmy Zhu, Department of ECE Jim Hoburg, Department of ECE Katayun Barmak, Department of MSE Chando Park, CIT Xiaochun Zhu, Department of ECE. Program Objective. To understand the scalability of MRAM technology
E N D
MRAM initiative • Bob White, Department of ECE • Jimmy Zhu, Department of ECE • Jim Hoburg, Department of ECE • Katayun Barmak, Department of MSE • Chando Park, CIT • Xiaochun Zhu, Department of ECE
Program Objective • To understand the scalability of MRAM technology • To develop innovative architectures that enable scaling
Scaling Reduce metal pitch Write Current? Thermal Stability?
Overview of initiative Micromagnetic Modeling Memory element shape Finite Element Modeling Cell design Shielded conductors Test Structure High △/ Fe3O4 ? Fabrication Thermal assist
Examples of simulated domain configurations for different shape elements: NiFe: D=1mm Fe (100) Co: D=1mm NiFe: 1mm Switching of various shaped elements: 0.1mm 0.2mm Memory element shape
Very low switching current, low operating power. • Robust magnetic switching. • 4 F2 memory element size. read line Write line • Good thermal stability. Down-size scaling “0” state “1” state Cell design
Fe3O4 2,400 % TMR CoFe 41 % TMR High △/ Tunneling Magnetoresistance Ratio vs. Polarization
8Å I 10Å half-select elements NiFeCo(15Å) Thermally Activated Switching Probability
Exchange field at room temperature Writing Exchange Field Temperature ( oC) Thermal assist
Shielded conductors • Micromagnetic : Jimmy Zhu • Macromagnetic : Jim Hoburg
Macromagnetic (finite element) modeling of shielded conductors
Components of flux density in memory cell: shielded conductor
Operating points on B-H characteristic:linear portion of nonlinear simulation
Components of flux density in memory cell: unshielded conductor
Eddy current solution (f = 125 MHz) phase 0: phase 90:
Magnetic 150nm 50nm 100nm 100nm 200nm y Parameters: Ms = 800 emu/cc, A= 1.0x10-6 erg/cm x Mesh size: 5nm z Dynamics: Micromagnetic modeling of shielded conductors
Comparison of macromagnetic and micromagnetic results: horizontal field in memory cell
Comparison of macromagnetic and micromagnetic results: vertical field in memory cell
Conclusions(regarding shielded conductors) • Factor of 2 increase in field in cell (or factor of 2 decrease in current) • Field in cell can be made more uniform through shield design • Eddy currents not significant • Macromodeling and micromodeling yield same results