1.2k likes | 1.69k Views
CAD-CAM IN FPD. TECHNOLOGICAL TRENDS IN DENTISTRY. Information systems Treatment systems. INTRAORAL IMAGING SYSTEM . COMPUTER IMAGING SYSTEM . CAD-CAM SYSTEM. DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHIC SYSTEM. COMPUTERIZED PERIODONTAL PROBE. RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE PROCESSING SYSTEM. TREATMENT SYSTEMS .
E N D
CAD-CAM IN FPD www.rxdentistry.net
TECHNOLOGICAL TRENDS IN DENTISTRY Information systems Treatment systems www.rxdentistry.net
INTRAORAL IMAGING SYSTEM www.rxdentistry.net
COMPUTER IMAGING SYSTEM www.rxdentistry.net
CAD-CAM SYSTEM www.rxdentistry.net
DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHIC SYSTEM www.rxdentistry.net
COMPUTERIZED PERIODONTAL PROBE www.rxdentistry.net
RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE PROCESSING SYSTEM www.rxdentistry.net
TREATMENT SYSTEMS Abrasive system Laser system www.rxdentistry.net
CAD-CAM SYSTEM Acronym for computer aided designing and computer aided milling or machining. www.rxdentistry.net
BRIEF HISTORY • Increasing demand • Restoration at a single appointment • Development- began in 1970’s with Duret in France. • French system - in 1983 by Dr.Francois Duret www.rxdentistry.net
On September 19, 1985, the first ceramic inlay was produced- at the dental Institute of the University of Zurich. • Mormann 1985 in Zurich, Switzerland www.rxdentistry.net
FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES OF CAD/CAM SYSTEM CSD CAD CAM www.rxdentistry.net
ADVANTAGES • One visit restoration • Time saving • Improved esthetics • Good morphology • Improved crown fit www.rxdentistry.net
Excellent polish • Less fracture due to single homogenous block • Wear hardness similar to enamel (Craig 1980) • Minimize cross infection • Good patient acceptance www.rxdentistry.net
DISADVANTAGES • Need for costly equipment • Need for extended training • Technique sensitive • Inability to image in a wet environment www.rxdentistry.net
MACHINABLE CERAMIC MATERIALS • Dicor MGC • Vita Mark II • Inceram Alumina • Inceram Spinell • Inceram Zirconia • Pro-Cad • Procera Allceram www.rxdentistry.net
CERAMIC BLOCKS • Available in wide range of shades and sizes • More homogenous • Less porous • Mounted on a metal stub www.rxdentistry.net
Effects of surface finish and fatigue testing on the fracture strength of CAD-CAM and pressed – ceramic crown (Hickel - JPD 1999) Purpose To determine the fracture strength of various all ceramic crowns with and without cyclic loading. www.rxdentistry.net
Material & Method Machinable ceramic material, Vita Mark II and ProCAD and conventional heat-pressed IPS – Empress crowns were fabricated, with either a polished or an oven – glazed surface finish. Cyclic loading that simulated oral conditions were performed on half of each group. www.rxdentistry.net
Conclusion The Cerec Pro-CAD crowns had significantly greater strength than the Vita Mark II crowns, better resistance to cyclic loading and lower failure probability than laboratory fabricated IPS empress crowns. www.rxdentistry.net
Cyclic loading significantly reduced the strength of all-ceramic crowns, but had less effect on cerec crowns than on the IPS Empress crowns. Oven-glazing of ProCAD crowns resulted in significantly higher strength and higher resistance to cyclic loading than surface polishing. www.rxdentistry.net
An upto 5 year Clinical Evaluation of posterior In-ceram CAD/CAM core crowns (Mormann – Int. J Prosthodont 2002) Evaluated the clinical performance of posterior CAD-CAM generated In-ceram alumina and In-ceram spinelll core crowns using the corec 2 CAD-CAM system and after 5 years of service concluded that the clinical quality of CAD-CAM generated In-ceram Alumina and In-ceram Spinell posterior crowns was excellent www.rxdentistry.net
CLINICAL PROCEDURE Preparation Design Optical Impression Computer generated restoration design Milling Polishing and cementation www.rxdentistry.net
PREPARATION DESIGN www.rxdentistry.net
OPTICAL IMPRESSION • Lacks reflectivity • Special Powder • Rubber dam www.rxdentistry.net
COMPUTER GENERATED RESTORATION DESIGN • Restoration is designed • Operator moves the cursor • 3-D image • Design phase – 2 – 8 min. www.rxdentistry.net
MILLING • Computer selects • Block is inserted • Milling device is activated • Three axis of rotation cutting machine www.rxdentistry.net
PROCESSING TIME www.rxdentistry.net
POLISHING • Rough ceramic surfaces are smoothed with clean white stones • Polished with - Rubber wheel of fine grit - Diamond impregnated wheels & points www.rxdentistry.net
CEMENTATION • Composite resin cement • Zinc phosphate • Glass ionomer • Ceramic restoration that have been etched internally and bonded with a composite resin cement are 50% stronger than similar restoration cemented with zinc phosphate cement (Ludwig 1994) www.rxdentistry.net
Effects of Preparation and Luting system on All-ceramic computer generated crowns (Mormann – Int. J Prosthodont 1998) Examined the effect of inside crown form on fracture strength of cemented and bonded crowns. • Four preparation types were used www.rxdentistry.net
Machined crown were placed on abutments a. Without any media as control group b. Cemented with zinc phosphate c. Bonded And were loaded until fracture www.rxdentistry.net
RESULTS • Zinc phosphate cemented crowns showed significant increase of fracture load values compared to uncemented control crowns. • Fracture load values of bonded crowns were significantly higher than those for cemented crowns. • Bonded crowns with thick occlusal dimension showed the highest fracture load values. www.rxdentistry.net
He concluded that bonded all ceramic CAD-CAM crowns with defect oriented inside morphology and increased occlusal dimension showed high fracture load values. www.rxdentistry.net
CEREC CAD/CAM SYSTEM • PROCERA CAD/CAM SYSTEM • TITAN CAD/CAM SYSTEM • CELAY CAD/CAM SYSTEM • CICERO CAD/CAM SYSTEM • LAVA CAD/CAM SYSTEM www.rxdentistry.net
CEREC SYSTEM • Chair side economical reconstruction of esthetic ceramic. - Cerec – 1985 - Cerec 2 – 1996 - Cerec 3 – Feb’ 2000 www.rxdentistry.net
CEREC CAD-CAM SYSTEM Limitation • Cannot mill the occlusal surface • Only inlays and onlays www.rxdentistry.net
CEREC – 2 CAD-CAM SYSTEM • Milling of occlusal surface possible • Inlays, Onlays, veneers and crowns • Milling time approx. 10min www.rxdentistry.net
The grinding precision of the cerec-2 is 2.4 times higher than cerec system (Mormann 1997) www.rxdentistry.net
CEREC – 3 CAD-CAM SYSTEM • Advanced version • Technical improvements • Designing and grinding- less time (27%) • Grinding unit – 2 cutters www.rxdentistry.net
Marginal and Internal Fit of Cerec 3 Cad/CAM All Ceramic Crowns (Kojima – Int. J Prosthodont 2003) Examined the effect of the occlusal convergence angle of the abutment and the computer luting space setting on the marginal and internal fit of cerec 3 CAD-CAM all ceramic crowns. Mandibular second premolar all ceramic crowns were fabricated for nine different conditions using cerec-3 CAD-CAM system www.rxdentistry.net
Occlusal convergence angle of 4,8 and 12° • Luting space settings of 10, 30 and 50µm. www.rxdentistry.net