460 likes | 603 Views
Introduction. Team Members Jeffrey Kung Richard Sabatini Steven Ngo Colton Filthaut. Faculty Advisor Jim Mohrfeld Richard Sabatini Steven Ngo Colton Filthaut. Underclassmen Walter Campos Alan Garza Richard Sabatini Steven Ngo Colton Filthaut. Agenda. Goals
E N D
Introduction Team Members • Jeffrey Kung • Richard Sabatini • Steven Ngo • Colton Filthaut Faculty Advisor • Jim Mohrfeld Richard Sabatini Steven Ngo Colton Filthaut Underclassmen • Walter Campos • Alan Garza Richard Sabatini Steven Ngo Colton Filthaut
Agenda • Goals • Choice of Configuration • Component/Material Selection • Design • Mechanical Design • Thermodynamic Design • Cost Analysis • WBS/Gantt Chart • Risk Matrix
Agenda • Goals • Choice of Configuration • Component/Material Selection • Design • Mechanical Design • Thermodynamic Design • Cost Analysis • WBS/Gantt Chart • Risk Matrix
Goals • To have a working Stirling Engine that will serve as a portable generator capable of producing 2.5 kWh • To be able to run multiple common household appliances simultaneously
Household Appliances • Appliances (average): • Refrigerator/Freezer = Start up 1500 Watts • Operating = 500-800 Watts • Toaster Oven = 1200 Watts • Space Heater = 1500 Watts • Lights: Most common are 60 Watt light bulbs • Tools (average): • ½” Drill = 750 Watts • 1” Drill = 1000 Watts • Electric Chain Saw 11”-16” = 1100-1600 Watts • 7-1/4” Circular Saw = 900 Watts
Agenda • Goals • Choice of Configuration • Component/Material Selection • Design • Mechanical Design • Thermodynamic Design • Cost Analysis • WBS/Gantt Chart • Risk Matrix
Choice of Configuration • Gamma • Cost efficient • No seal required in the displacer cylinder • More versatile with its design • Easy to isolate the cold and hot pistons
Generator Flow http://s3.amazonaws.com/bvsystem_tmp/pages/1296/original/xlibber%20Flickr%20propane%20torch%20plumbing%20tools%20bob%20vila%203257353199_316079a59e_b.jpg http://www.atiracing.com/products/dampers/101/crank2.jpg http://www.whirlpool.com/digitalassets/WRF989SDAM/Standalone_1175X1290.jpg http://www.diversifiedbattery.com/media/graphics/D34-78.jpg http://static.ddmcdn.com/gif/5-signs-alternator-problems-1.jpg
Agenda • Goals • Choice of Configuration • Component/Material Selection • Design • Mechanical Design • Thermodynamic Design • Cost Analysis • WBS/Gantt Chart • Risk Matrix
Hot Cylinder Material Selection http://www.onlinemetals.com/ http://www.onlinemetals.com/ http://www.onlinemetals.com/
Cold Cylinder Material Selection http://www.onlinemetals.com/ http://www.onlinemetals.com/ http://www.onlinemetals.com/
Piston Materials • Displacer Piston • Forged Steel • High in Strength • Retains Heat • Density of 0.279 lb/cu. in. • Power Piston • Forged Aluminum • Light Weight • High in Strength • Density of 0.101 lb/cu. in. http://www.mahle.com/ Ocyaniqueprofessionals.com
Alternator Selection http://www.mechman.com/ http://www.ecoair.com/ https://www.dcpowerinc.com/
Alternator Selection Calculation (Mechman) • Selecting an alternator is a key component when designing the stirling engine to reach an output of 2.5kW • Rpms required from engine when using a 3:1 pulley ratio • 900 rpms needed from the engine • 2700 rpms needed from the alternator • 1 hp per 600 watts to run the alternator • To calculate the torque required to spin the shaft http://www.mechman.com/images/products-s-curve-big.png
Agenda • Goals • Choice of Configuration • Component/Material Selection • Design • Mechanical Design • Thermodynamic Design • Cost Analysis • WBS/Gantt Chart • Risk Matrix
Mechanical Analysis Power and Displacer Piston Crank-Slider mechanism • Variables • Connecting Rod Length (L) • Crankshaft Arm Length (R) • Force on Piston (F) • Mass of Piston (M) • Angular Velocity (ω) • 571.4 rpm required => (ω)= 6.266 rad/s • ω R L M F http://www.stirlingengine.com/displacer-anim
Mechanical Analysis First iteration 1.5:1 Displacer to Piston dia. Ratio • Power Piston • Diameter: 4.5” • Connecting Rod Length (L): 5.956” • Crankshaft Arm Length (R): 1.75” • Mass of Piston (M): 1.561 lbm • Displacer Piston • Diameter: 6” (Box Piston) • Connecting Rod Length (L): 8.934” • Crankshaft Arm Length (R): 2.625” • Mass of Piston (M): 62.238 lbm
Mechanical Analysis Piston Positions Relative to Crankshaft • Power Piston • Displacer Piston
Mechanical Analysis Piston Velocity • Power Piston • Displacer Piston
Mechanical Analysis Piston Acceleration • Power Piston • Displacer Piston
Mechanical Analysis Piston Required Force • Power Piston • Displacer Piston
Mechanical Analysis Required Force • Displacer Piston
Mechanical Analysis Required Force • Power Piston
Mechanical Analysis Variables That Will Increase The Required Force • Flywheel • Rotating device that stores and delivers rotational energy when the forces applied to the crankshaft are discontinuous • Will account for the downward forces required to drive the crankshaft with angular momentum • Common formula: KE=½•I•ω2 • Additional forces to drive the flywheel are required • Gravity • Forces in the upward direction will work against gravity, while downward forces will be working with gravity • Additional Masses • Connector rod and crankshaft masses • Alternator • Requires additional torque from the crankshaft
Agenda • Goals • Choice of Configuration • Component/Material Selection • Design • Mechanical Design • Thermodynamic Design • Cost Analysis • WBS/Gantt Chart • Risk Matrix
Different Calculation Methods Schmidt Analysis (Isothermal Conditions) • The temperature remains constant under compression and expansion in order for work to be done on the system • Most ideal condition which will output the maximum work that can be obtained by an engine with respect to its volumes • First Order Design Method (Our Current Approach) • Combination of both isothermal and adiabatic processes • Will calculate the change in work with respect to the change in volume, temperature and pressure • Takes into account the dead volumes & and the areas of specific heat • Relates the masses of the working gas through out the system to the crank angle • Second Order Design Method • Builds off of First Order Design method • Takes into account all the heat transfer losses and relates them to variables such as time, material type, and efficiency • Chokes nozzle points and regenerator tube parameters will be taken into effect
Isothermal Analysis(Schmidt) • With the “Schmidt Analysis” We get an approximation of our power and pressure output in a perfect isothermal condition • Since our frequency from our crank shaft is 9.18Hz our power output from this calculation is 7532 Watts
First Order Design Method (Adiabatic & Isothermal) Th=800K Tc=400K Ideal Heat Efficiency=50% (without heat transfer calculations) http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/thermo/carnot.html
First Order VS. Isothermal • New Variables First Order Took Into Account • Change in the mass of the gas with respect to temperature • Cold & hot dead volumes • Change in energy of the working gas throughout the system • Temperature & pressure drops. • Specific Heat of the different boundaries
First Order Design Method • 1 atm≈100.3 kPa • We have come to the conclusion that we would have to pre pressurized to obtain a higher output to our system.
Agenda • Goals • Choice of Configuration • Component/Material Selection • Design • Mechanical Design • Thermodynamic Design • Cost Analysis • WBS/Gantt Chart • Risk Matrix
Agenda • Goals • Choice of Configuration • Component/Material Selection • Design • Mechanical Design • Thermodynamic Design • Cost Analysis • WBS/Gantt Chart • Risk Matrix
Agenda • Goals • Choice of Configuration • Component/Material Selection • Design • Mechanical Design • Thermodynamic Design • Cost Analysis • WBS/Gantt Chart • Risk Matrix
Risk Matrix
Questions? Cot-mect4276.tech.uh.edu/~stngo3