1 / 1

Sensing the Slopes: Sensory Modality Effects on a Goal Location Task

Sensing the Slopes: Sensory Modality Effects on a Goal Location Task Steven Weisberg 1 , Daniele Nardi 2 , Nora Newcombe 1 , & Thomas Shipley 1 1 Temple University, 2 Sapienza University of Rome. Effect of Sensory Modality. Introduction. Egocentric/ Allocentric ?. *.

kane
Download Presentation

Sensing the Slopes: Sensory Modality Effects on a Goal Location Task

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Sensing the Slopes: Sensory Modality Effects on a Goal Location Task Steven Weisberg1, Daniele Nardi2, Nora Newcombe1, & Thomas Shipley1 1Temple University, 2Sapienza University of Rome Effect of Sensory Modality Introduction Egocentric/Allocentric? * • Terrain slope is a salient spatial cue, useful in spatial orientation for humans. However, males use slope cues more reliably than females (e.g., Nardi, Newcombe, & Shipley, 2011; 2012). We designed a goal location study to investigate 3 questions. • Can slope be represented only visually or only kinesthetically? • Are gender differences in using slope modulated by sensory modality? • Is there a preference for egocentric or allocentric representation of slope (e.g., Shelton & McNamara, 2001)? And, does this vary by sensory modality? Trials were either concordant (facing direction = goal) or discordant (facing direction ≠ goal) during retrieval. Participants committed orthogonal errors more on discordant trials, suggesting that slope was a highly salient axis , and that participants used an egocentric reference frame. Sex Differences Slope is specified in the environment by visual and kinesthetic information. In the real world, these senses normally reinforce each other. Apparatus and Procedure Participants were faster only for concordant compared to discordant trials (discarding 2 participants who were wrong on all trials), not for facing direction or goal location. This is strong evidence for an egocentric reference frame. Correlations Varied by Sex Conclusions • Slope can be accurately coded visually OR kinesthetically. • Sex differences: • Males performed more accurately in the kinesthetic condition, but females were more accurate in the visual condition. • Performance correlated with MRT for males, but WLT for women. • Error patterns and reaction time provided evidence for an egocentric encoding of slope. Participants learned the location of the goal either while seated in the chair (visual-only), while standing up but blindfolded (kinesthetic-only condition), or while standing up and could see (combined). They were then disoriented, and asked to point to the goal after being told they were facing either uphill or downhill. Male (above the diagonal) performance on the goal location task was significantly correlated with the Mental Rotation Test (MRT). Female performance (below the diagonal) was significantly correlated with the Water Level Test (WLT). SOT = Spatial Orientation Test, SBSOD = Santa Barbara Sense of Direction. The Spatial Intelligence & Learning Center is composed of the following universities and is funded by an NSF Science of Learning Centers grant.

More Related