1 / 26

What mass are the smallest protohalos in thermal WIMP dark-matter models?

What mass are the smallest protohalos in thermal WIMP dark-matter models?. Kris Sigurdson Institute for Advanced Study Space Telescope Science Institute Hubble Fellows Symposium April 20, 2006. Outline. Thermal WIMPs and Chemical Decoupling WIMP Kinetic Decoupling

kane
Download Presentation

What mass are the smallest protohalos in thermal WIMP dark-matter models?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. What mass are the smallest protohalos in thermal WIMP dark-matter models? Kris Sigurdson Institute for Advanced Study Space Telescope Science Institute Hubble Fellows Symposium April 20, 2006

  2. Outline • Thermal WIMPs and Chemical Decoupling • WIMP Kinetic Decoupling • Small-Scale Cutoff in the Matter Power Spectrum • My Results: The Kinetic Decoupling Temperature • The Mass of the Smallest Protohalos in Viable Particle Physics Models

  3. Standard Model of the Universe Galaxy Surveys “The Standard Model” Hubble Space Telescope BBN Supernovae Surveys CMB

  4. Nonbaryonic Dark Matter

  5. Thermal WIMPs Weakly Interacting Massive Particles Cosmologically stable due to a conserved quantum number. In thermal equilibrium at early times (high temperatures) and relic abundance fixed by the total annihilation cross section of pairs to all lighter species. (particle-antiparticle pairs have no net “charge”)

  6. WIMP Chemical Decoupling Freeze-Out Annihilation Rate Expansion Rate Eventually the annihilation rate drops below the expansion rate of a FRW Universe. Pairs of WIMPs can no longer find each other efficiently in a Hubble time and the relic abundance is fixed

  7. WIMP Relic Abundance Relic Abundance from Freeze-Out Relic Abundance from Cosmology  We now know the total annihilation cross section for thermal WIMP dark matter! Are the any other astrophysical indicators of the particle physics?

  8. WIMP Chemical Decoupling Freeze-Out Annihilation Rate Expansion Rate Eventually the annihilation rate drops below the expansion rate of a FRW Universe. Pairs of WIMPs can no longer find each other efficiently in a Hubble time and the relic abundance is fixed

  9. Many Few The End of Dark-Matter Interactions? The end of: Annihilation (Number Changing) Elastic Scattering NOT The end of: Inelastic Scattering Same Conserved Quantum Number Photons, Neutrinos, Charged Leptons, Quarks

  10. WIMP Kinetic Decoupling Scattering Rate Expansion Rate Oscillates with plasma Eventually the scattering rate drops below the expansion rate of a FRW Universe. WIMPs no longer scatter off the thermal bath efficiently in a Hubble time and start to cool, free-stream, and then gravitationally cluster

  11. Evolution of Perturbations Decoupled Dark Matter Plasma

  12. WIMP Kinetic Decoupling From A. Loeb and M. Zaldarriaga, Phys. Rev. D 71, 103520 (2005) [arXiv:astro-ph/0504112].

  13. WIMP Kinetic Decoupling From A. Loeb and M. Zaldarriaga, Phys. Rev. D 71, 103520 (2005) [arXiv:astro-ph/0504112]. Small-Scale Cutoff

  14. The Mass of the Smallest Protohalos The temperature of kinetic decoupling sets the small-scale cutoff in the matter power spectrum. In turn, the small-scale cutoff sets the mass of the smallest protohalos that form when these scales go nonlinear at What value is Tkd?

  15. What Value is Tkd? S. Hofmann, D. Schwarz, and H.Stöcker, Phys. Rev. D 64, 083507 (2001) [arXiv:astro-ph/0104173]. A. Green, S. Hofmann, and D. Schwarz, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc 353, L23 (2004) [arXiv:astro-ph/0309621]. A. Green, S. Hofmann, and D. Schwarz, JCAP 0508, 003 (2005) [arXiv:astro-ph/0503387]. Estimate in “generic” supersymmetric (SUSY) models. Predict power spectra and that an earth mass cutoff is expected in SUSY models.

  16. An Earth Mass from SUSY? S. Profumo, KS, M. Kamionkowski, “What mass are the smallest protohalos?” [arXiv:astro-ph/0603373]. Q: Is an earth mass cutoff really generic in WIMP models that produce the cosmological abundance of dark matter? NO

  17. Our Approach S. Profumo, KS, M. Kamionkowski, [arXiv:astro-ph/0603373]. • Kinetic-decoupling temperature for WIMPs in supersymmetric models of dark-matter. • Must account for the dark matter abundance from cosmology and be compatible with present constraints from particle physics. • Include detailed model (with correct cross sections) of the particle physics for both chemical and kinetic decoupling.

  18. Scattering Cross Section S. Profumo, KS, M. Kamionkowski, [arXiv:astro-ph/0603373]. Same Relic Abundance Resonant Scattering Z Boson +Sleptons (Light Scalars) Only Z Boson (Heavy Scalars)

  19. Kinetic Decoupling Temperature S. Profumo, KS, M. Kamionkowski, [arXiv:astro-ph/0603373]. Scan over SUSY Parameter Space. Maximum Minimum

  20. Minimum Protohalo Mass S. Profumo, KS, M. Kamionkowski, [arXiv:astro-ph/0603373]. Scan over SUSY Parameter Space. Maximum Minimum

  21. Conclusions of our Paper S. Profumo, KS, M. Kamionkowski, [arXiv:astro-ph/0603373]. • Earth mass protohalos are possible but are NOT a generic prediction of SUSY. • A wide range of Mc between 10-6 and 100 Mare possible. • We expect the range derived here to be characteristic of other particle physics models of thermal WIMPS beyond SUSY.

  22. Observational Signatures? S. Profumo, KS, M. Kamionkowski, [arXiv:astro-ph/0603373]. Q: Can protohalos survive to the present day and be important in our Galaxy? A1: For small (Mc < 10-7M ?), probably No. (Green and Goodwin 2006) Stellar disruption time less than age of the Galaxy. A2: For larger McMaybe. Could amount to as much as 0.1% of dark matter in the Galaxy by mass (neglecting disruption). At M: (Diemand et al. 2005) 100% survive at RSun (Zhao et al. 2005) 0% (Berezinsky 2005) 17% Must survive mergers, accretion processes, tidal stripping, and tidal disruption by stars. Bright Side: Even if disrupted can produce tidal streams. Bottom Line: Tough Astrophysical Problem. Simulation of orbits of minihalos in realistic galaxies.

  23. Observational Signatures S. Profumo, KS, M. Kamionkowski, [arXiv:astro-ph/0603373]. • Enhanced Gamma Ray Annihilation Signal? 1) Protohalos within our Galaxy could be bright gamma sources. 2) Clumpiness may enhance total gamma ray flux from nearby extragalactic systems. • Enhanced Direct Detection Rates. 1) If a protohalo or the tidal stream of a disrupted protohalo passes through the Solar neighborhood then direct detection rates will be enhanced by perhaps a factor 10. 2) If the smooth dark-matter component is reduced then direct detection rates at other times will be slightly decreased.

  24. Particle Physics/Astrophysics Observation Feedback Loop!

  25. Summary • Kinetic Decoupling of WIMPs sets the minimum mass of dark-matter protohalos. • Earth mass protohalos are NOT a generic prediction of SUSY CDM models. • Perhaps: Another window onto the particle physics of dark matter! • The Challenge: Relate the physics of dark matter to the astrophysics of dark matter and ultimately to observations of dark matter! Can’t just ignore it.

More Related