160 likes | 280 Views
Beneficiaries National Board Meeting April 26-27 th , Atlanta GA . Cancer Research support. Who supports medical research? Where does SAA fits in the mix of funders? How SAA selects beneficiaries? Who has SAA selected as beneficiaries.
E N D
Beneficiaries National Board MeetingApril 26-27th, Atlanta GA
Cancer Research support • Who supports medical research? • Where does SAA fits in the mix of funders? • How SAA selects beneficiaries? • Who has SAA selected as beneficiaries
Research Support Along the Continuum of Biomedical Research Implementation Studies Basic Research Translational Research Human Clinical Studies Clinical Practice Delivery of Care NSF NIH Philanthropy Adapted from Sung & Hulbert , Chap 17 Clin Trans Science, 2009 Industry slide compliments of B Myers: DDCF
Funding of Biomedical Research in US slide compliments of B Myers: DDCF Source: Dorsey et al., Table 1, JAMA 2010
Philanthropic Funding • Private foundations: • Private (endowed) funds • Fund raising not a central activity • Board as central control • Live vs. dead money • Donor control Boards vs. wills, trusts, institutions control Board • Public charities (such as SAA) • Public funds • Fund raising critical, stewardship of donors dollars • Donors, local committees (boards), central board • Control less centralized • Year to year budget
Private Foundation Investment in Medical Research 2010 total estimated to be $1.1 Billion* *Source: The Foundation Center
Public Charities Funding Cancer Research 2010 total estimated to be $0.9 Billion* EXAMPLES *Source: Research!America
What defines SAA? Local funds for local beneficiaries • Public foundation • Donor based, event-centric • About 3 million in awards • On the National map, when seen as an aggregate • Focused on “Cancer” • Focused on cancer, but not a specific cancer • Event dependent • Yearly cycle of funding, linkage to event. • If we raise it , we spend it. If we don’t raise it……
Responsibilities of National Beneficiary Committee • Establishing New Beneficiaries • support local programs with screening of “potential beneficiaries” • support local programs with review of proposals from potential • recommend to National and local boards beneficiaries for approval • Current beneficiaries • Review progress reports for past year • Comment on progress to local and National Boards • Recommend for approval/disapproval substantial changes in program, including new investigators, projects.
Event income in 2011* * Rough estimates for discussion only, not final numbers
Beneficiary awards in 2011* * rough estimates for discusssion only, not final numbers
Progress Report 2011: JHU High impact publication in Science vol 331, March 2011