1 / 26

Cohn, Mills, and Towery UBC Winter Conference, 2011

The evolution of capital structure and operating performance after LBOs: Evidence from US tax r eturns. Cohn, Mills, and Towery UBC Winter Conference, 2011. Motivation. Difficult to study what happens after firms go private—No longer file financial statements.

kapila
Download Presentation

Cohn, Mills, and Towery UBC Winter Conference, 2011

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The evolution of capital structure and operating performance after LBOs:Evidence from US tax returns Cohn, Mills, and Towery UBC Winter Conference, 2011

  2. Motivation • Difficult to study what happens after firms go private—No longer file financial statements. • Existing evidence largely based on: • Firms with public debt outstanding. • Firms that exit (provide some backward looking data). • Firms do have to file tax returns! • Unique access to tax returns allows for a more complete view.

  3. Questions addressed • What are the real and financial effects of LBOs? • Real Effects: • Do better incentives provided by concentrated ownership and disciplining effects of debt lead to better operating performance? • Financial Effects: • How does leverage evolve after the LBO • Temporary versus permanent effects on capital structure. • Tax implications.

  4. LBO TrendsAxelson et al. (2009)

  5. Answers

  6. Answers

  7. What should one expect? • Practitioners talk about three sources of gains in LBOs. • Deleveraging. • Multiples expansion. • Operating Improvements. • Generally target >20% IRR to LP’s.

  8. Deleveraging

  9. Multiples Expansion

  10. Operating Improvements

  11. LBO Value Creation

  12. Comments • Paper would benefit from some structured hypotheses. • Jensen’s Free Cash Flow. • Decrease in investment and increase in profitability. • Underleverage. • Permanent increase in leverage. • Debt used as a transaction mechanism. • Transitory increase in leverage.

  13. Why do firms go private?

  14. Comments • Need for some better comparisons to existing studies. • Mainly regarding how the tax data compares to Gaap financials. • Would be useful to compare your measures versus the gaap data pre-LBO and then during the LBO for the sample of public debt users. • EBIT versus EBIAT. • I think you actually report earnings before interest after tax.

  15. Axelson et al. (2009)

  16. Hotchkiss et al. (2010)

  17. This paper

  18. This Paper

  19. Incentives and Performance Improvements (Oyer and Leslie) • Difficult to observe counterfactual. • Significant Heterogeneity.

  20. Leverage changes • If this is an optimal capital structure why can’t public firms replicate this? • If the tax benefits are so large??? • What is special about the LBO structure to support so much debt? • Debt overhang? • Ability of sponsors to minimize risk/reduce bankruptcy costs? • Private versus public? • Reduce leverage again after an IPO.

  21. Are LBOs Underlevered?Axelson et al. (2009)

  22. Why isn’t leverage decreased?

  23. Oyer and Leslie Increase in leverage is not permanent.

  24. Comments • This does not look like Jensen’s free-cash flow hypothesis. • Higher incentives and debt curtail wasteful spending by managers and focus attention on cash flow generation. • No substantial operating improvements. • Significant asset growth. • Financed largely by debt. • Why does interest coverage hardly change despite increased debt?

  25. Is Asset Growth From Cash?Kwik Fit LBO

  26. Conclusions • Observe LBOs throughout the lifecycle. • How does the data compare to Compustat? • More direct tests of hypotheses. • Heterogeneity in LBOs. • Underleveraged prior to LBO? • Free cash flow problems? • Overinvestment?

More Related