160 likes | 232 Views
Historical Research and Critical Thinking. How to Think About and Analyze Primary Sources. Archives vs. Libraries. Libraries document a subject Libraries maintain single, published items Patrons do not necessarily require the assistance of a librarian.
E N D
Historical Research and Critical Thinking How to Think About and Analyze Primary Sources
Archives vs. Libraries • Libraries document a subject • Libraries maintain single, published items • Patrons do not necessarily require the assistance of a librarian
“It is no easy matter to tell the truth, pure and simple, about past events; for historical truths are never pure, and rarely simple.” -David Hackett Fischer[i] [i] David Hackett Fischer, Historians’ Fallacies: Toward a Logic of Historical Thought, Harper & Row, New York, 1970, p. 40.
Types of Sources • Primary Source—a source created directly by a person who witnessed the event • Secondary Source—a source created by someone who did not witness the event firsthand and which may have been created long after the original event
Primary Sources • Personal Records • Social Records • Legal Records
What Qualifies as a Primary Source? • Original records (vital records, government records, etc.) • Correspondence • Journal/diary entries of a witness • Interview/oral history • Newspaper articles (written by someone who witnessed the event) • Photographs • Audio/video recordings of the event • Contemporary (to the event) published works (books, etc.)
What is not a Primary Source? • Textbooks or other works written by a historian • Accounts written long after the event • Secondary sources can still be important for background information about the topic being researched!
What Is Historical Research? • Solving an historical problem or determining historical truth • A Process of analysis and interpretation of historical evidence
Critical Thinking • Is the source reliable? • Does the creator of the source have any bias towards the event they are recording? • Would the creator have had a motive for misrepresenting the facts? • Consider the creator of the record—were they in a position to know enough information to write about their topic? • Is the author making any assumptions without evidence to support his claims? Are there any unwarranted claims (claims without enough evidence)? • Are there any inconsistencies or fallacies in the source’s logic? • Does the source make a strong argument?
Critical Thinking and Historical Research • External Criticism • Internal Criticism
External Criticism • Where? • When? • Why? • Whom?
Internal Criticism • What is the real and literal meaning of the document? • Can you detect any bias or prejudice that calls into question the author’s argument? • Can you ascertain the truth of the author’s conclusions?