80 likes | 174 Views
Advanced Tree-Structures. Incorporating sentence types in a unified description tt. (Complementizer Phrase = S´). CP. Functional categories. XP. C´. C [+ Que]. OP. XP. O´. O [+Past]. VP. Lexical categories. NP. V´. did. V. NP. Homer. the Oddity. write.
E N D
Advanced Tree-Structures Incorporating sentence types in a unified description tt
(Complementizer Phrase = S´) CP Functional categories XP C´ C [+Que] OP XP O´ O [+Past] VP Lexical categories NP V´ did V NP Homer the Oddity write Did Homer write the Oddity? (Operator Phrase = S)
CP AdvP C´ When C [+Que] OP XP O´ O [+Past] VP NP V´ did V NP Homer the Oddity write When did Homer write the Oddity?
CP NP C´ C [+Que] OP XP O´ O [+Past] VP NP V´ did V NP Homer what write What did Homer write? Cf. the echo-question: Did Homer write what?
CP NP C´ What C [+Que] OP XP O´ O [+Past] VP NP V´ did V NP Homer t write What did Homer write? what
CP NP C´ Who C [+Que] OP XP O´ O [+Past] VP NP V´ wrote V NP who t write the Oddity t Who wrote The Oddity? Cf. Who did write the Oddity? - without V-movement who
CP XP C´ C [+Dec] OP NP O´ O [+Past] VP Homer NP V´ wrote V NP t the Oddity t Homer wrote the Oddity. Cf. Homer did write the Oddity - without V-movement
Who did you wanna beat ? Who did you want to beat t *Who did you wanna win? Who did you want t to win Reality of traces Nothing between want and to, so contraction is OK There is a ’trace’ between want and to, so contraction is NOT OK