1 / 24

Steam Sterilization Cycle Modeling and Optimization for

Steam Sterilization Cycle Modeling and Optimization for. T EAM M EMBERS Jared Humphreys Mike Arena Matt Lototski John Chaplin Colin Bradley. A DVISOR Greg Kowalski. S PONSOR - M ICROFLUIDICS Mimi Panagiotou Dan Dalessio. Background. ● Manufacture machines called “Microfluidizers”

karen-stafford
Download Presentation

Steam Sterilization Cycle Modeling and Optimization for

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Steam Sterilization Cycle Modeling and Optimization for TEAMMEMBERS Jared Humphreys Mike Arena Matt Lototski John Chaplin Colin Bradley ADVISOR Greg Kowalski SPONSOR - MICROFLUIDICS Mimi Panagiotou Dan Dalessio

  2. Background ●Manufacture machines called “Microfluidizers” ●These machines force product through fixed geometry micro-channels using intense pressure ●Product goes in as random large particles and exits as uniformly sized nanoparticles

  3. Background ●Used in a growing number of pharmaceutical, personal care, biotechnology, food and chemical applications ●System must be sterilized between each processing session to ensure purity of product ●Sterilization cycle is multi-staged and time consuming ●Wetted surface must be exposed to steam at 121°C for at least 20 minutes per ASME BPE-a-2004 requirements

  4. Competitive Technology • High Shear Dispersers • Pulverizing Mills • Coaxial Mixers • Planetary Ball Mill • Not capable of achieving uniform nano-level particles

  5. Project Goals FAILING SEAL WITHIN INTENSIFIER PUMPS • To verify that all sections of the system which come in contact with the product are heated to 121°C or higher for at least 20 minutes during the steam sterilization cycle • Find a solution to stop the intensifier pump seal failure Failing Seal Piston Product Chamber

  6. Operation Sequences 1. Prime the machine Use WFI, USP Purified Water, Product or other process compatible fluid 2. Process Product 3. Clean in Place 4. *Steam in Place* 5. Cool Down

  7. Steam in Place Process ● Steam in Place – 3 Stages ● Heat product wetted piping and outside of chambers first ● Saturated steam from boiler at 138° C and 35 psig is passed through the system ● Temperature and pressure are monitored at the system inlet and outlet

  8. Intensifier Pump Process Step 1 Seal Check Valve #1 Piston Step 2 Check Valve #2 To Chambers

  9. Seal Failure • Seal failure method “thermal degradation” • Seal material: TIVAR H.O.T. • Maximum seal operating temperature: 135°C • Excessive temperature exposure or thermal cycling causes the seal to crack and become softer

  10. Deliverables ● Computer simulation of steam in using computational fluid dynamics software (Fluent) ● Analysis of simulation to determine that current process complies with ASME sterilization requirements ● Recommendations of changes to current process to eliminate seal failure

  11. Solidworks Model ●Extremely complex ●Incompatible with Fluent analysis as-is ●Many components needed to be remodeled with interior flow path defined (heat exchangers, pumps, valves)

  12. Area of Concern Temperature and Pressure Sensors • Focus area of current system successfully modeled in Solidworks • File imported to Gambit for 3D meshing and subsequent Fluent Analysis • Determined temperature around the seals to aiddesign solutions Intensifier Pumps Chambers

  13. Pressure Outlet Calculations P1 = inlet pressure P2 = outlet pressure μ = viscosity V = velocity D = Diameter L = length of chambers P1-P2 = (64*μ*V*L)/(2*D2) P1-0 = [(64)*(0.000013 Ns/m2)*(7.4 m/s)*(.3 m)]/[(2)*(0.000078m)2] P1 = 151,794 Pa P1*V1=P2*V2 (35psig)(1.1in^2)=P2(13.81in^2) P2 = 2.95 psi Draw Pressure

  14. CFD Analysis Saturated Steam T1 = 411 K (138 C) P1 = 241300 Pa (35 psig) Pipe Sections 316L Stainless Steel Seal Location (Inside Pump) Tamb = 298.1 K h = 6 w/m2-K P3 = 221310 Pa P4 = 221310 Pa P2 = 151000 Pa

  15. GAMBIT Mesh

  16. Static Pressure (Pa) P1 = 241300 Pa P3 = 221310 Pa P4 = 221310 Pa P2 = 151000 Pa

  17. Static Temperature (K) Seal Temperatures ~408 K (135’ C)

  18. Velocity (m/s)

  19. Reynolds Number

  20. Thermal Verification mass flow rate = m = ρ·V·A m = (.546 kg/m³)(300 m/s)(.000792 m²) m = .192 kg/s Heat Loss = q = m·Cp·[Tin - Tout] = h·As·[Tave - T∞ ] q = (.129 kg/s)(2.0133 Ws/kgK)(408.1 - 407.9 K) = .026 Watts q = (6 W/m²)(.00374 m²)(407.95 - 298.1 K) = .024 Watts

  21. Proposed Solution • By decreasing inlet temperature 5°, seal temperatures are well below limits (130° C max) • Transient analysis shows inlet temperature adjustment does not significantly affect warm-up time • Does not require any modification to current system design

  22. Static Temperature (K) Decreased Inlet Temp 406 K (133°C) Seal Temperatures ~403 K (130°C)

  23. Future Work • Remodel pump chambers in GAMBIT to enable analysis with piston motion simulated • Model remaining steam phases to ensure reduced steam temperature can be used throughout entire sterilization process

  24. Questions?

More Related