380 likes | 602 Views
Promoting Quality by Internal Accreditation Veljko Malba ša University of Novi Sad Novi Sad, J un e 4, 2004. Welcome to Novi Sad !. Veljko Malbaša , Ph.D. Professor and Director Department of Electrical Engineering Phone: 021 450-032 malbasa @ uns.ns.ac.yu. Project.
E N D
Promoting Qualityby Internal AccreditationVeljko MalbašaUniversity of Novi SadNovi Sad, June 4, 2004
Veljko Malbaša, Ph.D. • Professor and Director Department of Electrical Engineering • Phone: 021 450-032 • malbasa@uns.ns.ac.yu
Project • “Internal accreditation of programs at the UNS” • Funded by the Ministry of Education, Autonomous Province of Vojvodina
Participants • Marija Stefanović, Ph.D., Assistant Professor, Faculty of Philosophy • Dragoslav Herceg, Ph.D., Professor, Faculty of Science • Veljko Malbaša, Ph. D., Professor, Faculty of Engineering • Students
Topics • International dimension • Where we are
Overview • Quality Assurance • Accreditation • Serbia • UNS • Conclusions
Quality Assurance • Accreditation • UNS • Serbia • Conclusions
Quality • Suitability of ways and means for the achievement of specific defined aims • Fitness for purpose
Quality at University • Teaching • Research • Technology Transfer • Administration
Why? • Globalisation of the higher education • International dimension of quality • Global practice
Aspects of Quality • Development • Improvement • Assurance • Supervision
QualityAssurance • Assessment • Audit • Accreditation
Assessment • Quantitative measurement • How many faculty, students • How many rooms, chairs
Audit • External review of the processes inside the University
Quality Assurance • Accreditation • Serbia • UNS • Conclusions
Accreditation • Attest to the quality • Determined upon an external review • Institution or program has to meet certain criteria • Valid for a limited period
Practice of Accreditation • Development of standards • Self - evaluation • External review • Accreditation decision
Two purposes • Present: Assessment • Future: Improvement
Two Types of Accreditation • Institutional • Programmatic
Questions • What are you trying to do? • Why? • How? • Why are you doing it this way?
Questions • Is this the best way? • How do you know it works? • How to improve?
Quality Assurance • Accreditation • Serbia • UNS • Conclusions
Serbia • National Committee for Accreditation of Higher Education • Procedure and documents produced • Overwhelmed with requests to open new private institutions
State of the affairs • No common, systematic policy • No standards • No measures • No procedures • No legislature
Misunderstandings • ISO • “We do a good job!” • “Our graduates are excellent!” • “As good as it gets!”
Quality Assurance • Accreditation • Serbia • UNS • Conclusions
UNS: Vision • Develop and maintain high quality • Leader in the region • European standards
University of Novi Sad • Internal Accreditation Committee • Deals with UNS member institutions • Compatible with national and European standards and policies
Objectives • Internal accreditation of programs • Help institutions • Promote accreditation
Documents • General rules and procedures • Guide for self evaluation • Brochure
Some recommendations • Legal framework • Awareness • Training • Develop criteria
Some recommendations • All programs go through the accreditation • Start with self evaluation reports • One member of the working group from outside S&M
Open questions Inputs Outcomes Evaluation
Open questions • Criteria • What to do with institutions that are not accredited • What about the duplication of programs
Quality Assurance • Accreditation • Serbia • UNS • Conclusions
Conclusions • Groundwork completed • Goal: prepare for action • Round table tomorrow