210 likes | 279 Views
Tax Reform: Principles and Implementation Supply, Demand, and Deadlines October 17, 2006 V. V. Chari University of Minnesota and Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. Takeaways ___________________________________________ Consumption taxes better than income taxes
E N D
Tax Reform: Principles and Implementation Supply, Demand, and Deadlines October 17, 2006 V. V. Chari University of Minnesota and Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis
Takeaways ___________________________________________ Consumption taxes better than income taxes Commitment to stable, predictable rules critical in fiscal policy Simplification is a red herring
Principles of Public Finance ____________________________ True burden of taxation is government spending Not current tax revenues Timing issues second order In practice, pretty much all taxes distort decisions Finance Minister’s problem: How to raise given amount of revenue while minimizing distortions
Principles of Public Finance (continued) ____________________ People pay taxes Businesses and corporations are a veil Taxing business to business transactions isn’t good way to raise revenue Should tax similar goods at similar rates Should tax inelastic factors heavily
Key Margins ___________________________________________ How much to work How much to save
Key Margins (continued) _________________________________ Sources of revenue Labor income taxes Capital income taxes Consumption taxes Only two margins: So all tax systems equivalent to system with, for example, Labor income taxes Consumption taxes Initial capital income
What do Positive Capital Income Taxes Mean ________________ Higher taxes on future consumption than current consumption In most economic models, current and future consumption similar So should tax at similar rates So positive capital income taxes bad idea
Temptation to Tax Capital Income ________________________ Today’s capital is result of past investment decisions Cannot be changed much Good idea to tax it heavily When tomorrow comes . . .
Tradeoff Between Equity and Efficiency ____________________ Little bit of a red herring Equity concerns can be accommodated pretty easily in efficient tax system
Bottom-Line Lessons from Public Finance __________________ Tax rates on labor and consumption should be roughly constant Capital income should not be taxed, intertemporal decisions should not be distorted Fiscal policy has time inconsistency problem Institutions to solve this problem are desirable
Solving the Time Inconsistency Problem _________________ Fed independence key for good monetary policy Would an independent institution help for fiscal policy? Base Closing Commission analogy: Government’s proposal voted up or down by Congress
Special Preferences ____________________________________ Health insurance: Health care is not that special Child Exemptions: Fertility rate not a problem in the United States Home mortgage interest deductibility: True tax break is failure to tax imputed housing income Charitable deductions: Decentralized giving may be better than government provision of public goods
Chari’s Ideal Tax System _______________________________ Progressive Consumption Tax implemented as follows: Households: Income defined in same say as currently, except that employer- provided fringe benefits are included Universal Savings Accounts. Annual contributions cannot exceed income (or some fraction thereof) Taxable Income (which is basically the same as consumption) = Total Income + Withdrawals from USAs–Contributions to USAs Progressive tax rates on consumption
Businesses: Taxable Income = Revenues – payments to employees – payments to other businesses for goods and services Note: Definition of taxable income has expensing of investment, so intertemporal decisions are not distorted
Why is this desirable? 1. Eliminates intertemporal distortions 2. Similar to current system 3. Allows for desired level of progressivity 4. No windfall gain to holders of old capital
Takeaways ___________________________________________ Consumption taxes better than income taxes Commitment to stable, predictable rules critical in fiscal policy Simplification is a red herring
Advisory Panel on Tax Reform __________________________ President establishes panel on January 7, 2005 Panel to raise same revenues as current system Bipartisan with two distinguished economists Panel submits recommendation on November 1, 2005
Proposals ___________________________________________ Two plans: Simplified Income Tax Plan Growth and Investment Tax Plan Panel also discusses Progressive Consumption Tax Plan
Key Features of Both Plans _____________________________ Household Income Tax Reduce top marginal tax rates Repeal Alternative Minimum Tax Replace mortgage interest deduction with tax credit Limit health insurance deduction Consolidate retirement, education, and health savings plans Provide incentives for low income taxpayers to save
Key Features _________________________________________ Corporate Income Tax Simplified Plan Dividends excluded at household level Simplified depreciation schedules Territorial Tax System for Interest and Income Growth and Income Plan Dividends received by households taxed at 15% Expensing of new investment Destination-based system
Claimed Advantages of Proposals ________________________ Simplification Base broadening Lower tax rates Closer to a consumption tax