230 likes | 337 Views
Water Management & Usage Now & For the Future. Philip Dunn, WCM / Brown & Co John Gatenby, Littlethorpe Farm Philip Dodd, Sandhutton Growers Ltd Andrew Morton, JSR Farms Ltd 8 th December 2011. Water Exploitation Index. International Perspective. England and Wales Water Supply Security.
E N D
Water Management & Usage Now & For the Future Philip Dunn, WCM / Brown & Co John Gatenby, Littlethorpe Farm Philip Dodd, Sandhutton Growers Ltd Andrew Morton, JSR Farms Ltd 8th December 2011
Water Exploitation Index International Perspective
England and Wales Water Supply Security National Perspective Blue– Available Water Yellow – No Surplus water Orange – Over licenced Red – Over abstracted
Liebig Law of the Minimum Growth is controlled not by the total amount of resources available, but by the scarcest resource... WATER ?
Yorkshire Major Arable Cropping(Askham Bryan Farm Business Survey 2009 / 2010)
Current Potato Water Situation • UK planted area 2011 – 126,328 Ha • Yorkshire & Humber – 14,298 Ha (11.3% of total) • UK production maintained around 6M tonnes since 1960 despite a 56% reduction in planted area. • Therefore increase in yield through: crop protection, fertiliser, varieties and IRRIGATION. • 70 million m3 of water used for irrigating UK crops in 2010 – 54% of this (37.8 million m3) used on potatoes (DEFRA Survey 2010) • To maintain yields over next 20 years, irrigation requirement needs to increase by 14 – 30% (Cranfield)
England & Wales Land Suitability(Changes In Land Suitability for Rainfed Potato Production Cranfield Univ
Current State of Play - Water • Natural rainfall plus river abstractions plus groundwater abstractions • Potatoes need 20 – 25mm per week June / July in average season • Natural rainfall variable • River abstractions licensing reduced due to increased urban demand • Groundwater abstractions reduced due to drop in groundwater levels
<< Options for securing water for agriculture >> 1 On farm winter abstraction and storage reservoir subject to soil type and / or lining Advantages: • Able to be in control on one site • Capital costs rest with water user • May have amenity value • Transferable value if holding traded • Economies of scale achieved with grower group type construction – more irrigated land availability
Disadvantages: • Need for planning permission and reservoir regulations for larger projects • Not always close for suitable winter abstraction site • Cost - £1.00 - £1.30 m3 for clay lined reservoir, £2.00 - £4.00m3 for butyl plastic lined reservoir
2. Upstream Water Abstraction Storage Reservoir Advantages: • Ability to use natural channel for water • Meter in / meter out • Able to site reservoir in less productive agricultural land • Ability to generate revenue stream from water trading
Disadvantages • Separate ownership from water users therefore need for secure contracts • Restricted by natural features • Higher capital costs, large scale, suitable project for co-operative funding • New idea – how will EA react? • Planning permission and N.I.M.B.Y.s • Ability to supply non agricultural water market (good or bad thing)!
3. Trans catchment transfer plans egKielder Water • North Tyne → River Wear → River Tees • Only needs small extension from river Tees to river Wiske at Great Smeaton (approx 2 miles) to access large supply of water, available throughout much of Yorkshire
Advantages: • North-East in surplus for water • Most infrastructure already in place, Kielder Water set up to supply Teeside heavy industry but now not required • Create a precedent for water export and trading • Increase security of supply for urban and agricultural needs
Disadvantages • Northumbrian Water now owned by Chinese company • Yorkshire Water privately owned • Capital and running costs of infrastructure • Wrong type of water for Natural England may effect local eco-systems
4. Aquifer replenishment near source of use, reverse feed down bore holes in winter period to raise ground water levels Advantages: • No storage construction needed • Relatively low infrastructure costs • Some low pressure pumping may be required
Disadvantages: • Need to be over very permeable aquifer eg sandstone in South Yorkshire, North Nottinghamshire • Automatic control may be needed to prevent excess water inputs • New concept not tried much in practice yet • Pollution risk due to volume of drinking water drawn from groundwater
5. Creative Reservoirs • Carry out geological survey of underground rock strata • Locate upland disused quarry of adequate depth • Construct overspill from nearby water course to take excess winter flow into quarry / reservoir (may also act as flood control measure – protecting areas downstream) • Use rock strata as a conduit from uplands to arable cropping areas
Questions Raised • Who will benefit? • Who will fund solutions? • Funding available from Pillar 2 CAP funding • Stewardship for water? • RDPE? • Flood Mitigation- funding? Would benefit wide area • When? • Time to complete? • Timeline? • Deadline?
Summary- Potatoes • Potatoes may move North, pulled by land availability and pushed by water shortages further South • Extra 14-30% water required to maintain current production (plus additional demand in future)- could be made available in Yorkshire subject to adequate measures taken • Better education to general public (possibly through retailers) could reduce water demand for potatoes (Scab etc), link into reducing overall food waste (Foresight)
Issues • Plenty of info and sources • None taking a lead and driving solutions • Looking for long –term, multi-generational solution • Same mindset as Foresight Report • Lack of appetite from government/agencies to commit to such long term projects? • Get ahead and act now or play catch-up later?