1 / 1

Additional file 1 Evaluation of the number of integrated copies

Additional file 1 Evaluation of the number of integrated copies. A. 3.5 kb. AgeI. P-HTG. 2.0 kb. 1.6 kb. ATG. HTG. ∆neo. 1.4 kb. 0.9 kb. P SV40. P SV40. P SV40. P SV40. wt 1* 2* 3 4* 5. B. 21 kb. AgeI. 5.0 kb. 2.0 kb. 0.9 kb.

karli
Download Presentation

Additional file 1 Evaluation of the number of integrated copies

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Additional file 1 Evaluation of the number of integrated copies A 3.5 kb AgeI P-HTG 2.0 kb 1.6 kb ATG HTG ∆neo 1.4 kb 0.9 kb PSV40 PSV40 PSV40 PSV40 wt 1* 2* 3 4* 5 B 21 kb AgeI 5.0 kb 2.0 kb 0.9 kb - wt 1 2 3* 4 5* 6 7 8* 9 10 11 12 A: Analysis of bordering fragmentsfrom P-HTG tagged HEK293 cells. lanes 1-5 individual clonesobtained upon tagging. B: Analysis of bordering fragmentsof P-Ab-HTG antibodytagged CHO cells. lanewt, untransfected CHO-K1 cells, lanes 1-12 correspondtoclones #1-12 in Fig. 2B. Cloneswithsinglebandsaremarkedwith an asterisk. wt: untransfectedcells; theneo probe usedforhybridizationisindicated. Foranalysis, highmolecular DNA of individual clones was extractedaccordingto Ramirez-Solis et al., 1992. The DNA was cutwithAgeIandsubjectedto Southern Blotting. Fordetectionof bordering fragments, theblot was hybridizedtotheNeosequence. Each band correspondsto an individual integrationsite. Single bandsindicatesingleintegrationsites. PAb-HTG LC HTG ∆neo LC Reference: Ramirez-Solis, R., et al. (1992). Genomic DNA microextraction: a method to screen numerous samples. Anal. Biochem. 201: 331–335.

More Related