1 / 33

Changes to Utah’s Accountability System

Changes to Utah’s Accountability System. Point Structure for Elementary and Middle Schools. Point Structure for Elementary and Middle Schools. Point Structure for Elementary and Middle Schools. Point Structure for High Schools.

kasen
Download Presentation

Changes to Utah’s Accountability System

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Changes to Utah’s Accountability System

  2. Point Structure for Elementary and Middle Schools

  3. Point Structure for Elementary and Middle Schools

  4. Point Structure for Elementary and Middle Schools

  5. Point Structure for High Schools Schools with a 12th grade: includes students in grades 10-12

  6. Point Structure for High Schools Schools with a 12th grade: includes students in grades 10-12

  7. Point Structure for High Schools Schools with a 12th grade: includes students in grades 10-12

  8. Below Proficient Subgroup • Below proficient students are identified as a single subgroup • Below Proficient Subgroup = All students who scored below proficiency (level 1 or 2) on the previous year’s CRT • Below Proficient Subgroup is determined independently for each content area (ELA, Math, and Science) • Students in the below proficient subgroup are also included in “all students” to increase focus on those most at risk • Complete disaggregated data for all 10 subgroups will be included in the UCAS report, including gap analysis

  9. Participation Requirement • A school must meet the 95% participation rate for the whole school and non-proficient subgroups of 40 students or more in each content area • Participation is calculated for the whole school and the non-proficient subgroup • Schools not meeting the participation requirement will receive a UCAS total score of 0

  10. Achievement Calculation

  11. Sample Elementary/ Middle School Achievement Calculation

  12. Sample High School Achievement Calculation

  13. Growth Calculation

  14. Growth Calculation • Based on “Student Growth Percentile” (SGP) • Cohorts of students with a similar achievement profile • Current CRT Scaled Scores are used to assign the students a percentile ranking within the cohort • Median percentiles will be used to compare classes, schools, and districts • UCAS uses a rubric and several calculations based on language arts, math and science SGPs to determine a school score

  15. Student Growth Percentile 2009 Scaled Score: 163 Joshua Jackson Garrett James Mandi Paul Mike Brinley Sam Joan Sally Tina Isaiah Ian Julie Jose Jane Brayden Mia Stephanie

  16. Student Growth Percentile 2009 Scaled Score: 163 Joshua Jackson 2010 Scaled Score: 167 Garrett James Mandi Paul Mike Brinley Sam Joan Sally Tina Tina Isaiah Isaiah Ian Julie Jose Jane Brayden Mia Stephanie

  17. Student Growth Percentile 2009 Scaled Score: 163 Joshua Jackson 2010 Scaled Score: 167 Garrett James Mandi Paul 2011 Mike Scaled Score: 159 Brinley Sam Joan Sally Tina Tina Isaiah Isaiah Ian Julie Jose Jane Brayden Mia Stephanie

  18. Student Growth Percentile 2009 Scaled Score: 163 Joshua Jackson 2010 Scaled Score: 167 Garrett James Mandi Paul 2011 Mike Scaled Score: 159 Brinley Sam Joan Sally Tina Tina Isaiah Isaiah Ian Julie Jose Jane Brayden Mia Stephanie

  19. Class, Grade/Dept., School Median SGP is calculated by finding the “middle” SGP of the group of students

  20. Normative Another representation: Think of a group of students, where each student has two test scores – one for 2009 and one for 2010. We could show the distribution of these scores at the same time as pictured.

  21. Normative We could ‘slice’ through the picture to show the 2010 distribution for just one 2009 score. The red shaded curve shows the distribution in 2010 for all students who scored 166 in 2009.

  22. Normative Assume we are interested in just one score, 170, in 2010. We could ask, what percentage of students who scored 166 in 2009 scored at or below a 170 in 2010? In this case, that turns out to be 75%. In other words, a score of 170 is at the 75th percentile.

  23. SGP Activity

  24. SGP Activity

  25. SGP Activity

  26. Growth Calculation—2012Buckets Growth Points Rubric Step 1: Find each group’s points from the rubric, using the group’s median growth percentile:

  27. Growth Calculation—2013 Sliding Scale Growth Points Rubric Step 1: Find each group’s points from the rubric, using the group’s median growth percentile:

  28. Growth Calculation Growth Points Rubric Step 1: Find each group’s points from the rubric, using the group’s median growth percentile:

  29. Growth Calculation (Cont.) Step 2: Find the average of all three subjects for both groups:

  30. Growth Calculation (Cont.) Step 3: Add the average of both groups for the total growth score:

  31. UCAS

  32. SGP Sample Student Profile

More Related