440 likes | 542 Views
The Librarian is IM: Instant Messaging Software vs. Virtual Reference Software… The Great Debate. Presented by: Elena Prigoda, Gerstein Science Information Centre, University of Toronto Jenn Horwath, Library @ Mohawk, Mohawk College OLA Super Conference, 2007. Agenda.
E N D
The Librarian is IM:Instant Messaging Softwarevs. Virtual Reference Software… The Great Debate Presented by: Elena Prigoda, Gerstein Science Information Centre, University of Toronto Jenn Horwath, Library @ Mohawk, Mohawk College OLA Super Conference, 2007
Agenda • Overview of Virtual Reference and IM at the Library @ Mohawk • Comparison of services • Overview of IM at Gerstein Science Information Centre • Implementation, Challenges, Results of pilot • Future directions for IM services • IM Acronym Quiz!
Agenda: Virtual Reference and IM at the Library @ Mohawk • Background • 1) Mohawk • 2) Virtual reference services • Comparisons between services • satisfaction, usage, administration, features • Next steps
Mohawk CollegeOverview • Located in Hamilton, Ontario • 10,000 students, 42,000 continuing ed. students • 4 campuses with libraries at each • Partnership with McMaster University for collaborative nursing program • Largest apprenticeship program in the province
Mohawk College Library Overview • 40 staff (6 Librarians, 1 Director) • 76,000 items in collection • Circulations: over 56,000 • Gate count: over 700,000 • 4 campus libraries plus 1 e-Library
Background: Virtual Reference Services • 1999: Email reference (Askme@mohawkcollege.ca) • changed to BRAINtogo in 2005. • Feb. 2003: Virtual Reference Software (VAL Consortium) • AskTheBRAIN • Feb. 2005: IM Chat - screen name: librarymohawk • changed to BRAINtogo in Summer, 2005.
Background: Virtual Reference Services • Consortium with Algonquin , GBC, Seneca, St. Clair. • Use Tutor.com software (formerly LSSI) • Platform changed in Summer, 2006. • Hours: 10am – 9pm M-F, 8:30am – 5pm S&S • Hours are shared across all colleges. • Marketing: student newspaper,, Library homepage, icons throughout web site, class visits • Staffed by reference desk person at non-busy desk (at Mohawk)
Background: Instant Messaging • Trillian is used to monitor AIM, MSN and Yahoo! • Monitored 8:30am – 9pm M-F, 8:30am – 5pm S&S. • Staffed by reference desk person at non-busy desk (in evenings both web-based and IM are monitored) • Marketing: student newspaper, homepage, signage (lots!), class visits
IM: BRAINtogo • BRAINtogo marketed as a bundled service: phone, email and chat
Email Reference Service • Askme@mohawkcollege.ca – link on homepage went to an online form or users could email the above email address. • BRAINtogo – users can email:braintogo@mohawkcollege.ca braintogo@yahoo.ca braintogo@hotmail.com braintogo@aol.com Users are directed to these emails when IM is not open.
IM acronym quiz break! What does AAK mean in IMspeak? AAK means: Asleep at the keyboard!
Comparison: Staff Satisfaction Fall 2006, Staff were asked to rank IM and virtual reference software transactions using the following scale: • 1: poor – a frustrating experience, could not provide assistance due to software problems. • 2: fair/adequate - provided assistance but encountered some problems with the software. • 3: good – was able to provide assistance with little or no problem.
Comparison: Staff Satisfaction Software staff ranked Fall 2006 virtual reference software transactions… …and IM transactions: Poor: 22 % Fair: 31% Good: 47% Good: 100%
Problems cited • Lack of co-browsing (a problem in 19% of sessions) • No response from patron (6% of sessions) • Lost connection (19% of sessions)
Conclusions Satisfaction • Staff are more satisfied using IM chat software… • Mainly because of problems with new version of web-based software. • Fewer questions through IM software to gauge satisfaction. • Student satisfaction? • Yet to be studied.
Comparison: Usage * Types of questions asked in IM vs. VR service: no difference.
Comparison: Usage • Usage: Virtual Reference receives more transactions than Instant Messenger.
Comparison - Usage • Other Libraries? Musselman Library, Gettysburg College: • 2002-2003: 4 questions • 2003-2004: 3 questions • 2005: 110 questions* Duke University Libraries: • Sept. 04-05: highest monthly usage: 140 questions (lowest: 49) UNC Libraries: • March 05-Oct.05: highest monthly usage: 200 (lowest: 48)** *Ciocco, Ronalee and Alice Huff. IM Working with Trillian. VRD Conference Proceedings, 2005. **Ferguson, Jean and Pam Sessoms. R u there? Adding Instant Messaging to an Established Virtual Reference Service. VRD Conference Proceedings, 2005.
Conclusions Usage • Virtual reference software achieves higher usage than IM chat - Why? • Students associate IM with recreation not work and don’t want to use it? • Lack of awareness? More marketing needed? • Confusion regarding services – competing brands? (AskTheBRAIN versus BRAINtogo) • Older service - students are more aware of AskTheBRAIN?
Conclusions • But…virtual reference software usage is dropping…while IM is increasing…
Conclusions • Glitches with new virtual reference software (repeat customers dissatisfied?) • Students becoming more independent researchers? • Browser incompatability using virtual reference software? (Only works with IE – Firefox usage is gaining*) W3Schools. Browser Statistics. Jan. 2007: http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp
IM acronym quiz break! What does IMNSHO (or IMHO) mean in IMspeak? IMNSHO means: In My Not So Humble Opinion IMHO means: In My Humble Opinion
Comparison: Administration Cost • Virtual Reference: $7,200US per year for the software. New price: $40,000US/year forConsortium. • Trillian: free download.
Comparison: Administration Training • Virtual Reference Software: 2-3 hours/per week in summer. • Feature-rich so many features to test • More complicated interface than chat • IM: ½ hour per staff member (can be done in large group). • Many staff use already so minimal training
Conclusions Administration of services • IM is much cheaper • IM takes less time to train staff (all Library staff must be able to cover IM service and only 7 staff are trained on virtual reference software at Mohawk)
Conclusions Administration of services • Virtual reference software allows for better consortial arrangements • Consortial arrangements allow for greater coverage of hours and knowledge sharing • …depends on your particular needs and resources
Comparison: Features/Quality Virtual Reference Software • Co-browsing • Scripted messages (for speed and consistency) • Database of answers and transcripts • Information about patron (college, student/faculty/other, program) available to librarian
Comparison: Features/Quality Virtual Reference Software • Statistics (access points, number of missed calls, librarian on duty, type of patron, etc.) • Ease of sharing service across Consortium • Red arrow to highlight items on screen (no longer available in Tutor.com) • Transcripts automatically sent to patrons for referring back.
Comparison: Features/Quality Virtual Reference Software Co-browsing – Pro’s: • Survey from Southern Illinois University Carbondale: • found that over 90% of virtual reference users are open to instruction. • Found high satisfaction with co-browsing among students surveyed - concluding that cobrowsing is effective as an instruction tool.* * Graves, Stephanie and Christina Desai. “Does Co-Browsing Enhance Instruction in Virtual Reference? VRD Conference Proceedings, 2005.
Comparison: Features/Quality Co-browsing • The most used feature is co-browsing with all others (page push, canned greetings and replies, canned URLs, etc.) a close second, except for slideshows. (Survey conducted of all VAL staff, 2005).* Peters-Lise, Jennifer. “Using IM for VR” Internal report, Feb. 2006.
Comparison: Features/Quality Virtual Reference Software Co-browsing – Con’s: • Co-browsing now requires a software download to work – no students downloaded the software from Sept. – Dec. 2006. • Co-browsing as a result did not work well in 19% of Mohawk sessions and many sessions from other colleges in VAL.
Comparison: Features/Quality IM – Pro’s • Students are already using the software (no learning curve – see Pew Report: The Rise of the Instant-Message Generation)* • Staff are already familiar with software • Buddy lists encourage repeated usage • Quick – no lag time between messages • Cheap • Can see students typing • * http://www.pewinternet.org/PPF/r/24/press_release.asp
Comparison: Features/Quality IM – Con’s • Basic statistics (logs only) • No scripted messages, transcripts for quality control. • Sharing across consortium? TBD
Conclusions: Features/Quality • If co-browsing is problematic, IM will suffice. • If limited hours are an issue, consortial arrangement is better.
Overall Conclusions • Staff Satisfaction: Staff happier using IM to answer queries. If VR software improves? • Usage: Greater use of VR software but IM on the rise. • Administration: Cheaper and easier to use IM. • Features/Quality: More features in VR.
IM acronym quiz break! What does G2G mean in IMspeak? G2G means: Got To Go
Future Directions at Mohawk & VAL • Monitor stats for trends • Investigate use of Instant Messenger software for consortium – co-branding? • Investigate other software such as Skype/Unyte, etc. Free co-browsing alternative? • Survey users of IM service
Questions? Resources: http://del.icio.us/electriclibrarian/virtualreference Contact: Jenn Horwath eLibrarian Library @ Mohawk jenn.horwath@mohawkcollege.ca braintogo (yahoo!/MSN/aol) or jennmohawk (yahoo!)