440 likes | 532 Views
Concave payoff patterns in equity fund holdings and transactions. Stephen J. Brown NYU Stern School of Business David R. Gallagher University of NSW Onno Steenbeek Erasmus University / ABP Investments Peter L. Swan University of NSW. Challenge to active managment.
E N D
Concave payoff patterns in equity fund holdings and transactions Stephen J. BrownNYU Stern School of Business David R. GallagherUniversity of NSW Onno SteenbeekErasmus University / ABP Investments Peter L. SwanUniversity of NSW
Challenge to active managment • Zero or negative alpha in fund returns • Can fund managers earn returns commensurate with fees they charge?
Challenge to active managment • Zero or negative alpha in fund returns • Can fund managers earn returns commensurate with fees they charge? • Recent evidence shows active trading does generate positive returns (Wermers 2000)
Challenge to active managment • Zero or negative alpha in fund returns • Can fund managers earn returns commensurate with fees they charge? • Recent evidence shows active trading does generate positive returns (Wermers 2000) • Negative quadratic term in market model • Can fund managers time the market?
Challenge to active managment • Zero or negative alpha in fund returns • Can fund managers earn returns commensurate with fees they charge? • Recent evidence shows active trading does generate positive returns (Wermers 2000) • Negative quadratic term in market model • Can fund managers time the market? • Recent evidence shows hedge fund managers use concave payout overlay strategies (Agarwall & Naik 2004)
Overview • Definition of concave payoff patterns • Detecting concave payoff strategies • Evidence from managed funds
Concave payout strategies • Zero net investment overlay strategy (Weisman 2002) • Uses only public information • Designed to yield Sharpe ratio greater than benchmark • Using strategies that are concave to benchmark
Concave payout strategies • Zero net investment overlay strategy (Weisman 2002) • Uses only public information • Designed to yield Sharpe ratio greater than benchmark • Using strategies that are concave to benchmark • Why should we care? • Sharpe ratio obviously inappropriate here • But is metric of choice of hedge funds and derivatives traders
We should care! • Delegated fund management • Fund flow, compensation based on historical performance • Limited incentive to monitor high Sharpe ratios • Behavioral issues • Prospect theory: lock in gains, gamble on loss • Are there incentives to control this behavior?
Sharpe Ratio of Benchmark Sharpe ratio = .631
Maximum Sharpe Ratio Sharpe ratio = .748
Examples of concave payout strategies • Long-term asset mix guidelines
Examples of concave payout strategies • Unhedged short volatility • Writing out of the money calls and puts
Examples of concave payout strategies • Loss averse trading • a.k.a. “Doubling”
Examples of informationless investing • Long-term asset mix guidelines • Unhedged short volatility • Writing out of the money calls and puts • Loss averse trading • a.k.a. “Doubling”
Forensic Finance • Implications of concave payoff strategies • Patterns of returns
Forensic Finance • Implications of Informationless investing • Patterns of returns • are returns concave to benchmark?
Forensic Finance • Implications of concave payoff strategies • Patterns of returns • are returns concave to benchmark? • Patterns of security holdings
Forensic Finance • Implications of concave payoff strategies • Patterns of returns • are returns concave to benchmark? • Patterns of security holdings • do security holdings produce concave payouts?
Forensic Finance • Implications of concave payoff strategies • Patterns of returns • are returns concave to benchmark? • Patterns of security holdings • do security holdings produce concave payouts? • Patterns of trading
Forensic Finance • Implications of concave payoff strategies • Patterns of returns • are returns concave to benchmark? • Patterns of security holdings • do security holdings produce concave payouts? • Patterns of trading • does pattern of trading lead to concave payouts?
Hedge funds follow concave strategies R-rf =α + β (RS&P- rf) + γ(RS&P- rf)2
Hedge funds follow concave strategies R-rf =α + β (RS&P- rf) + γ(RS&P- rf)2 Concave strategies: tβ > 1.96 & tγ < -1.96
Hedge funds follow concave strategies R-rf =α + β (RS&P- rf) + γ(RS&P- rf)2 Source: TASS/Tremont
Portfolio Analytics Database • 36 Australian institutional equity funds managers • Data on • Portfolio holdings • Daily returns • Aggregate returns • Fund size • 59 funds (no more than 4 per manager) • 51 active • 3 enhanced index funds • 4 passive • 1 international
Patterns of Trading • Buying on a loss and selling on a gain leads to concave payouts • Short Volatility replication • Loss averse trading (a.k.a. “Doubling”)
Short Volatility Strategy Sharpe ratio = .743
A clear and present danger? • Evidence of concave payout pattern in managed funds • Evidence in returns • Evidence in security holdings • Evidence in pattern of transactions • Consistent with • Adverse incentive story • Behavioral theories of trading • Effect limited to large, diversified funds