1 / 16

Foro de Interconexión Regional Políticas Públicas .

Foro de Interconexión Regional Políticas Públicas . PRESENTER: Bevil M. Wooding Special Advisor , Caribbean Telecommunications Union (CTU) LACNIC X, Isla Margarita, VE. Overview: The Caribbean Situation. In the very early stages of Emerging from decades of monopoly service

kassia
Download Presentation

Foro de Interconexión Regional Políticas Públicas .

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Foro de Interconexión RegionalPolíticasPúblicas. PRESENTER: Bevil M. Wooding Special Advisor, Caribbean Telecommunications Union (CTU) LACNIC X, Isla Margarita, VE

  2. Overview: The Caribbean Situation • In the very early stages of • Emerging from decades of monopoly service • National ICT Policy Development and Implementation • Development of local competitive environment • Developing relevant local content • Definition of a Regional Caribbean Agenda (in support of CSME) • Unavailability of critical supporting infrastructure • Regional fiber systems exist, however, in-country carrier-grade data centers and exchange points are rare.

  3. A Multi-layered Challenge LEADERSHIP vision| values| strategy

  4. Key Questions • How can infrastructure, content and policy initiatives beeffectivelysynchronised? • What specifically can be put in place to facilitate the negotiation of more favourable interconnection rates • Whatshoudbe the role of government/the state? • What impact canincreasedlevels of intra-regionalco-operation and partnershiprealisticallybring?

  5. The Interconnection Link • The interconnect regime decided upon has a major impact on the development/rate of growth of market segments. • the decision in the UK about revenue sharing on local rate numbers was a contributory factor in the explosive growth in dial internet and • the asynchronous reciprocity that exists between fixed and mobile termination rates. • Source8 (an EU based consultancy)

  6. Policy Options • Governments can assist in the closing of the gap with active policies. • Policies in favor of Internet development are: • Unbundling of last mile access, including Cable TV access • Reduced tariffs for Internet access • Fair rules for Internet peering between ISP's • Interconnection of ISP's with incumbent operators

  7. Policy Options • Active policies could also include: • Creation of public "telecenters", mainly for schools, libraries, local counties in rural areas, • PC's acquisition incentives • Universal Service funds application towards ICT's diffusion • Development or even introduction of Internet into government activities • Introduction of new e-learning and e-health programs • Tax reduction for the ICT's development.

  8. Other Considerations • Direct government policies should be concentrated in: • Deployment of modern telecommunications networks • Priority of Internet access in schools as universal objective • Implementation of educational programs for the use of informatics tools • Deployment of community "telecenters" to extend the Internet and other ICTs to lower income and rural population • Development of the e-Government tools

  9. Other Considerations • Promotion of international Internet interconnection at low prices. •  International help can also be optimized, concentrating and rationalizing available resources from ITU, NGOs and other financial organizations. • Promotion of local NAP (Network Access Point) to reduce interconnection costs.

  10. Controlling IXP Traffic • An IXP enables its member ISPs to interconnect with each other, but does not mandate that every member exchange traffic with every other. • It is up to each ISP connected to the IXP to determine whether, with whom, and on what basis (paid or unpaid) it will interconnect with another ISP to exchange traffic. • Careful use of BGP-4 allows an ISP to control whether its network will accept traffic from a given ISP

  11. The Peering/Transit Dichotomy • international Internet connectivity operates according to the peering/transit dichotomy. • connectivity costs are allocated according to bilateral contracts, which can generally be classified as either peering or transit agreements • In other words, the perverse situation is that Developing Country Internet service providers -- small companies struggling to provide network services to the poorest populations in the world -- are effectively subsidizing the largest, richest ISPs in Europe and the United States.

  12. Getting a Closer Connection • The localization of packet traffic - keeping the physical path traversed by packets as short as possible - produces measurable improvements in service cost, performance, and efficiency. • the business cases for domestic Internet enterprises improve dramatically - not just for ISPs, but for online banking, e-commerce sites, online government, enterprise VPNs, content hosting, web services, etc.

  13. Central Inhibitors to neutral IXPs • Legal restrictions • prohibitions on non-regulated telecommunications facilities, • enforced monopolies on international connectivity, • restrictive licensing regimes, and • burdensome tax treatments • Telecommunications regulatory agencies • who seek to extend their statutory authority over telephony to Internet infrastructure • and monopoly telecom operators and dominant ISPs • who seek to prevent effective competition

  14. Shift Required • Far too often, developing country ISPs behave like resellers: they buy connectivity from foreign suppliers, and resell to their domestic markets. • They must start seeing themselves as important stewards of a national (or regional) Internet backbone.

  15. Regional Interconnection & Public Policy LACNIC X, Isla Margarita, VE

More Related