250 likes | 265 Views
Dive into the transformation of CIO roles in higher education, from traditional to evolved foci, and explore the emerging challenges faced by CIOs 3.0. The discussion covers the parallelism paradox in academic technology R&D, research trends, positive outcomes, and disappointing results in technology integration. Discover how creating new traditions in academic technology can drive innovation and address the changing needs of educational institutions, with a focus on developing competencies for CIOs in the digital age. Explore the impact of academic technology and how CIOs can lead the way in adapting to new environments and advancements in the education space.
E N D
Does Academic Technology Competency Make CIO 2.0? Paul Kim Chief Technology Officer Stanford University School of Education
Discussion Topics * Transformation of CIO roles in the higher education space * Parallelism paradox in academic technology R&D * Creating new traditions
Traditional Foci (CIO1.x) • Connectivity • Legacy systems • E-mail service management • File servers, computer labs, desktop support
Traditional Foci (CIO1.x) • ERP Designing (More of dreaming) • Too busy putting out the fire • Getting the best systems engineers (Network/Server)
Evolved Traditions (CIO 2.x) • Productivity • Security & IP Protection • A/VOD/ Wireless coverage/Web portals
Evolved Traditions (CIO 2.x) • ERP for E-Learning and U-Access CMS, Classroom Technology, Mobile Learning • Too busy trying and learning new solutions • Get the best systems developers (Application development and integration)
Emerging Challenges (CIO 3.x) • Accountability • Intelligence-based tracking in all areas • Resource Virtualization/Streaming Apps/Fast backup & restore/Just-in-time stuff • Learning Outcomes as mROI • E-portfolio system, Learning outcome matrices
Emerging Challenges (CIO 3.x) • ERP to best accommodate teaching and research while maximizing learning • Too busy convincing the Faculty Senate • Get the most experienced academic technology specialists
After all, it is an academic enterprise we are working for. • How is your IT relevant to what students demonstrate as competencies and what your faculty publish?
Research Trends • High tech innovations • Tend to work with schools that have well developed infrastructure • ICT research too often follows technology innovations, not vice versa
Positive Outcomes • Instructors • More technology enthusiasts • Better adopters • Well controlled experiments • Smaller sample populations • Stakeholder support
Replications Not Feasible • Large and real settings • Multiple complex dimensions • Highly heterogeneous learners • Less technology enthusiasts • Instructors with much administrative tasks • Not enough support
What might have made a difference… • Large and real settings • Need more in-depth situation-specific needs analysis • Multiple complex dimensions • Tackle one dimension at a time • Highly heterogeneous classes • Class management technology and Self-remedy solution • Less technology enthusiasts • Build a community of support first • Instructors with much administrative tasks • Unbundling roles • Not enough support • No learning curve solution • Overall, they were in need of simple, highly adaptive and flexible technology that is most relevant to the learning context
Early Interests (AT 1.x) • Cognition • Learn better • Metacognition • Better manage learning • Retention • Better remember what was learned • Transfer • Better apply what was learned • Motivation • Better chances to do all the above
Evolved interests (AT 2.x) • Situation Specificity • Cultural Sensitivity • Practical Usability • Theoretical Applicability • Economic Scalability • Viable Sustainability
Emerging Interests (AT 3.x) • Educational entrepreneurship • Tangible impact (Either for-profit or non-profit) • Bridging with social innovations • Local, regional, and global community needs
Why AT3.x? • Supports the ultimate role of higher education in multiple aspects • Much more visible outcomes • In the future, there will be only two kinds of leaders in the higher education space: • Highly visible leading universities in at least one academic specialty area or • Highly accessible, efficient, and convenient education providers
No update, no gain • Technology gets old too fast • Need to learn to learn better
No transformation, no chances • Make time to examine the changes and patterns in the education space • Become adaptable to the new environments • Respond to the new needs
Questions for you: • What are the new competencies for today’s CIOs? • What do researchers do and say about academic technology? • Should Academic Technology be lead by CIOs? • When people take 99.9% uptime for granted, what happens to the IT department? • What are you? Are you CIO X.X?