210 likes | 651 Views
Offshore Safe Lifting Committee. Co-Chairs Gregg Germer: ExxonMobil Bob Watson: Seatrax Cranes. History of Safe Lifting Committee. April 2009 Joint Agency (MMS & USCS) letter to Industry notifying concerns with lifting May 2009 API responds to MMS / USCG letter
E N D
Offshore Safe Lifting Committee Co-Chairs • Gregg Germer: ExxonMobil • Bob Watson: Seatrax Cranes
History of Safe Lifting Committee • April 2009 • Joint Agency (MMS & USCS) letter to Industry notifying concerns with lifting • May 2009 • API responds to MMS / USCG letter • Safe Lifting Committee (SLC) has first kickoff meeting • July 2009 • API Lifting Conference is held • August 2009 • SLC meeting held • December 2009 • SLC meets again • MMS-OOC meeting • February 2010 • SLC finalizing recommendations • March 2010 • SLC issues recommendations to API • May 2010 • SLC meets • API RP 2D rewrite committee has first kickoff meeting • July 2010 • IADC Lifting Conference
Objectives of SLC • Analyze lifting data and incidents • Comment on trends and lessons learned • Communicate findings to industry End Result: REDUCE/ELIMINATE LIFTING INCIDENTS
OCS Incidents vs Lifting Incidents (2005-2009) 3,478 OCS incidents 727 were lifting related 20.9% of incidents reported involve lifting 600 associated with cranes 127 associated with other lifting devices 509 associated with production operations (70%) 218 associated with drilling operations(30%)
OCS Injuries vs Lifting Injuries (2005 – 2009) 1,367 OCS injuries 209 lifting injuries 15.3% of injuries associated with lifting 142 associated with cranes 67 with other lifting devices 51 of 209 injuries were serious (LTA > 3 day) 73 lift injuries associated w/ drilling operations 136 lift injuries associated w/ production operations
OCS Fatalities vs Lifting Fatalities (2005-2009) 42 OCS fatalities 7 lifting fatalities 16.7% of fatalities associated with lifting 3 associated with cranes 4 with other lifting devices 6 of 7 lifting fatalities associated w/ drilling operations Reflective of data on February 11, 2010
SLC Conclusions • Hardware failures while occurring were not predominant factor for incidents • Not following training or established procedures was main factor leading to an incident • Rigger was individual that needed to be focused upon • Classroom training alone does not make someone “qualified” or “certified”. • Hands on “field training” is needed to become “qualified”
SLC Recommendations to the following: • Operators • Trade Associations • Regulators (MMS & USCG)
Operators Recommendations • Review current lifting programs to address process and procedures • Training qualifications • Lift planning and Job Safety Analysis (JSA’s) • Communications (especially between crane operators, riggers, and master of vessel) • Stop Job Authority • Support and participate in industry lifting activities • Encourage sharing of incidents and near misses • Familiarization with MMS crane PINC’s
Trade Associations Recommendations • Update API RP 2D...specifically directed towards rigger training, lifting planning and JSA’s • Communicate issues, best practices, and recommendations to industry and regulatory bodies • Organize and sponsor lifting safety conferences
Regulators Recommendations • Safety Alerts and Investigative reports: Issue timely along with potential corrective actions • Develop a way to provide “sanitized” incident information in timely manner. • (MMS Form 2010 and USCG Form 2692) • Update Regulatory references to current standards • Support and participate in industry lifting activities