210 likes | 309 Views
Pension Reform in a Mature Welfare State – Danish Experiences. Lars Haagen Pedersen June 8, 2007. The Scandinavian Welfare model. Public transfer income and services: Universal entitlements based on objective criteria Equality issues are central (transfers are indexed to wages)
E N D
Pension Reform in a Mature Welfare State – Danish Experiences Lars Haagen Pedersen June 8, 2007
The Scandinavian Welfare model Public transfer income and services: • Universal entitlements based on objective criteria • Equality issues are central (transfers are indexed to wages) • Large public production of individual service • High level of standards for public provision of welfare services Financing • Direct and indirect taxation of income
The social contract • The public sector redistributes income over the life cycle • The responsibility of individuals in the working ages towards children and the elderly is institutionalized in the public sector • Enables and requires a high labour market participation rate of both men and women. Implies high tax rates by international standards • High sensitivity to changes in demography
Aims of the retirement reform • Maintaining the share of life in employment with increasing life expectancy (i.e. a constant labour force relative to population) • Maintaining the current level of social pension relative to wage income
Age distribution of net contributions to the public sector per individual, 2004
Danish pension system • Voluntary early retirement scheme from 60 years for individuals in the labour market • Disability pension for individuals up to 65 years with diagnosed reduced ability to work • Universal social security pension for individuals from 65 years • Fully funded labour market related pensions (DC-schemes) • Private pension schemes (DC-schemes)
Baseline: Macroeconomic levels in 2040 in the projection compared to 2004 • Real GDP has grown 92.8 percent • Employment is reduced by 7.2 percent • Private consumption has grown 106.4 percent • Public consumption has grown 119. 8 percent • Fiscal sustainability requires an annual reduction in public expenditures of 4.0 percent of GDP
The retirement reform I • The legal pension age of the VERP and the social pension is indexed to the life expectancy of a 60 year old average individual. • The legal pension age of the VERP is increased by a ½ year in each of the years 2019 to 2022. • The legal pension age of the social pension is increased by a ½ year in each of the years 2024 to 2027
The retirement reform II • Starting in 2025 the legal pension age of the VERP is increased according the increase in life expectancy of a 60 year old in the period from 2010-2015. The increase is announced in 2015. • The legal pension age of the social security pension is increased according to the same increase in life expectancy – in 2030 (This keeps the pension period of the VERP constant). • Legal pension age is increased by 0, ½ year, 1 year each fifth year after the initiation in 2025
Resulting labour market participation rates in 2005, 2030, 2050
Macroeconomic levels in 2040 given the retirement reform compared to 2004 • Real GDP has grown 101.4 percent (92.8 percent) • Employment is reduced by 0.3 percent (7.2 percent) • Private consumption has grown 113.6 percent (106.4 percent) • Public consumption has grown 119. 8 percent (119.8 percent) • Fiscal sustainability requires an annual reduction in public expenditures of 2.2 percent of GDP (4.0 percent)
Time inconsistency? • Current generations of voters close to retirement age are exempted from the gradual increase retirement age – whereas future generations of voters will experience this gradual increase • Changes in the retirement age are introduced by ”jumps” in the retirement age of up to 1 years. This generates large annual changes in labour supply and potential problems in case troughs in business cycles.
Conclusion • The retirement reform solves the problem of a declining labour supply (relative to population) • The retirement reform solves approximately half of the fiscal sustainability problem in Denmark by maintaining a constant share of transfers to GDP • The part of the sustainability problem that follows from the increased individual public services is not solved