160 likes | 387 Views
The tilt between accretion disk and stellar disk. Shiyin Shen Shanghai Astronomical Observatory Collaborators : ZhengYi Shao , Minfeng Gu. Motivation. Correlation between the orientation of stellar disk and accretion disk?. What we know. Inclination of stellar disk Axis ratio b/a
E N D
The tilt between accretion disk and stellar disk Shiyin Shen Shanghai Astronomical Observatory Collaborators:ZhengYi Shao,Minfeng Gu
Motivation Correlation between the orientation of stellar disk and accretion disk?
What we know • Inclination of stellar disk • Axis ratio b/a • Inclination of accretion disk • pc scale, difficult to measure • Tilt between jets and stellar disk (Kpc VS Kpc) • wide distribution, jet avoid lying close to the plane of the dust disks (Schimitt et al. 2002, 20 radio galaxies) • Kpc scale radio jet orient randomly with respect to the host galaxy axes. (Gallimore et al. 2006, 19 objects)
Type II AGNs: accretion disk viewed edge-on. Our test: do the stellar disks of their hosts also more likely be viewed edge-on?
Type II AGNs in SDSS DR7 • BPT diagram • Star forming VS AGN • Kewley et al. 2001 • Theoretical upper limit of starbursts • Kauffmann et al. 2003 • Empirical separation NAGN=109,832
AGNs hosted by spirals • fracDev<0.5: select spiral galaxies • Fcomp = fracDeV FdeV + (1 - fracDeV) Fexp • ~40% of galaxies are spiral • AGNs hosted by spirals • ~30% of AGNs hosted by spirals • b/a of late type galaxies • approximate the inclination of disk Disk height Disk ellipticity NAGN,spiral=32,618
~32,600 type II AGNs hosted by spiral galaxies spatial correlation betweenaccretion disk and stellar disk distinctive physical properties of AGN host b/a distribution A control sample with the same physical properties as AGN hosts
Control sample of galaxies • The same distributions of • Stellar mass • Redshift • Concentration • D4000 • R50 • FracDev How about b/a? • AGN VS Non-AGNs • AGN VS control Non-AGNs
The AGN hosts indeed biased to low inclinations (b/a)! How to interpret this systematical bias?
Incl= f(b/a| ,,,) (, ) disk structure parameter = C/A :disk height = (1-B/A) : disk ellipticity AGN have the same (, ) distribution as control galaxies! (, ) viewing angle : inclination : position angle Control galaxies: random AGN hosts: preferred angle? the shape of spiral galaxies
, distributions Non-negative least square linear regression
viewing angle of AGN hots • Viewing angle of stellar disk (S, S) • Viewing angle of accretion disk (A, A) • Tilt angle between accretion disk and Tilt stellar disk AS • Opening angle of torus T • Type II AGN: 90-A< T s AS A 2T
Toy model (, ) distribution Random viewing angle of stellar disk (S, S) b/a of galaxy Viewing angle of accretion disk (A0, A0) Tilt angle AS NAGN/NAGN(b/a) 90-A0 < T Type II AGN fraction f2 (, ) distribution Viewing angle of observed AGN (A, A) b/a of AGN host
Model results • IfAS random or T=90 • cosAS: uniform distribution • NAGN/NGAL=1 • Non-random Assumption • cosAS follows Gaussian distribution, with most probable value AS =0, scatter As,m • AS,m=37 deg • T: free parameter • T =58 deg • f2=80%: in excellent agreement with the results in literature!
Summary • We select a sample of 32,618 type II AGNs hosted by spiral galaxies from SDSS DR7. • We build a control sample of galaxies, which are expected to have the same physical properties as the AGN hosts. • By comparing with the control galaxies, we find the AGN hosts are more likely to be viewed as edge-on. • The bias in the axis ratio (inclination) of the AGN hosts can be explained with a simple model that • the opening angle of the torus is ~60 degree • the mean tilt angle between the accretion disk and stellar disk is ~30 degree