1 / 18

To match or not to match? Voice, concordancing and textmatching

To match or not to match? Voice, concordancing and textmatching. Cally Guerin & Michelle Picard Researcher Education & Development . Originality. “Be original … but not toooo original” document structure c onventions of citation d isciplinary language (Eira, 2007) . Voice.

kay
Download Presentation

To match or not to match? Voice, concordancing and textmatching

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. To match or not to match? Voice, concordancing and textmatching Cally Guerin & Michelle Picard Researcher Education & Development Researcher Education & Development School of Education

  2. Originality “Be original … but not toooo original” • document structure • conventions of citation • disciplinary language (Eira, 2007) Researcher Education & Development Adelaide Graduate Centre

  3. Voice “as a metaphor [voice] has to do with feeling-hearing-sensing a person behind the written words, even if that person is just a persona created for a particular text or a certain reading.” (Bowden 1999 quoted in Hirvela & Belcher, 2001, p. 85). Researcher Education & Development Adelaide Graduate Centre

  4. The right outfit… ‘situational voice’ (Ede 1992) the right outfit for the occasion (Hirvela & Belcher 2001) http://www.dreamstime.com/royalty-free-stock- photography-royalty-free-stock-photography-woman- choosing-clothes-image19395087 Researcher Education & Development Adelaide Graduate Centre

  5. … from the 2nd hand rack • ‘Voice types’ (Ivanic and Camps 2001) • http://www.rnw.nl/africa/article/festive-bargain-hunting-kouté-ivory-coast Researcher Education & Development Adelaide Graduate Centre

  6. http://circavintageclothing.com.au/2011/06/ Researcher Education & Development Adelaide Graduate Centre

  7. Markers of voice 1. assertiveness 2. self-identification 3. reiteration of central point 4. authorial presence and autonomy of thought (Helms-Park & Stapleton 2003) Researcher Education & Development Adelaide Graduate Centre

  8. ‘Try it on’ Text matching Turnitin Concordancing (AdTAT, ConcApp, Springer) Researcher Education & Development Adelaide Graduate Centre

  9. Intelligently reading reports Researcher Education & Development Adelaide Graduate Centre

  10. Categorising matches Researcher Education & Development Adelaide Graduate Centre

  11. Corpora and Concordancing Researcher Education & Development Adelaide Graduate Centre

  12. ConcApp Researcher Education & Development Adelaide Graduate Centre

  13. AdTAT version Researcher Education & Development Adelaide Graduate Centre

  14. Researcher Education & Development Adelaide Graduate Centre

  15. Too much matching – 48% • Screen shot Researcher Education & Development Adelaide Graduate Centre

  16. Too original – 2% match • Screen shot Researcher Education & Development Adelaide Graduate Centre

  17. Conclusion Researcher Education & Development Adelaide Graduate Centre

  18. References Cho, S. 2004. Challenges of entering discourse communities through publishing in English: Perspectives of nonnative-speaking doctoral students in the United States of America. Journal of Language, Identity and Education 3(1): 47–72. Eira, C. 2005. Obligatory intertextuality and proscribed plagiarism. 2nd Asia-Pacific Educational Integrity Conference. Newcastle, Australia, 2–3 December. Flowerdew, J. 2000. Discourse Community, Legitimate Peripheral Participation, and the Nonnative-English-Speaking Scholar. TESOL Quarterly 34(1): 127–150. Helms-Park, R. and P. Stapleton. 2003. Questioning the importance of individualized voice in undergraduate L2 argumentative writing: An empirical study with pedagogical implications. Journal of Second Language Writing 12: 245–265. Hirvela, A., and D. Belcher. 2001. Coming back to voice: The multiple voices and identities of mature multilingual writers. Journal of Second Language Writing 10: 83–106. Ivanic, R. and D. Camps. 2001. I am how I sound: Voice as self-representation in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 10: 3–33. Lave, J. andE. Wenger. 1991. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pecorari, D. 2009. Formulaic language in Biology: A topic-specific investigation. In M. Charles, S. Hunston and D. Pecorari (Eds), Academic Writing: At the Interface of Corpus and Discourse. London: Continuum International Publishing. pp. 91–104. Researcher Education & Development Adelaide Graduate Centre

More Related