1 / 18

WG3 – Part 3 - Design Studies

WG3 – Part 3 - Design Studies. Introduction View from Europe - RE “ “ Japan - Yoshi Kuno “ “ US - Mike Zisman Conclusions from the discussion. Introduction. Two years since Study II A lot has been done since then

kaylee
Download Presentation

WG3 – Part 3 - Design Studies

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. WG3 – Part 3 - Design Studies • Introduction • View from Europe - RE • “ “ Japan - Yoshi Kuno • “ “ US - Mike Zisman • Conclusions from the discussion

  2. Introduction • Two years since Study II • A lot has been done since then • Time to start thinking about a third study • Much better:world study • Europe, Japan and US • Parallel session of WG3 devoted to this • Views of each region • Discussion on how to form world-wide study

  3. View from…….Europe • No design study so far • Work started late 1990s • Much achieved • Two layouts: CERN (complete) RAL (under development) • Effort dramatically reduced by CERN budget cuts • ECFA task forces re-organised  European Neutrino Group • Very important: rejuvenate EU activities

  4. Design Study – European View • Fixed by EU Framework 6 programme • FP5: 2 Neutrino Factory related bids, both failed • FP6: ESGARD formed - coordinated bid for accelerator R&D • Two areas of interest: Integrating Activities Design Studies • IA proposal already submitted: LHC upgrade, LC, NF • Basically for improving existing infrastructure IA  Neutrino Factory, superbeam, beta beam network HIPPI JRA

  5. FP6 Design Studies • EC will contribute to: • Feasibility studies – paper studies • Technical Preparatory Work – hardware • On new research infrastructures with a clear European dimension and interest. • Includes: future facilities of world-wide relevance not existing in Europe infrastructures constructed outside EU!

  6. FP6 Design Studies Feasibility studies • Aim: Lay conceptual foundations for new infrastructure • Methods: • Basic feasibility study • Explore new fundamental technology • Detailed engineering design, particularly most advanced TPW • Includes: • Development and testing of critical components, sub-systems, materials or techniques, including software • Does not include: • preparatory work based on existing or proven techniques • reproduction of available components or materials

  7. FP6 Design Studies Funding: • Total budget: 200M€; 70M€ in first call • EC contribution per project  10M€ • 50% matching required(?) Timing: • Call for proposals: October 2003 • Deadline: Spring 2004 • Evaluation results: Summer 2004 • Contract signatures: Start 2005

  8. Design Study Bid • EU will make FP6 Design Study bid • Essential to re-build activities in Europe • Host laboratory: RAL (possibly!) • Much better if part of world-wide design study • FP6 allows for/encourages this • May also provide some funding • Aim: ?DR for a Neutrino Factory ~2009

  9. View from……Japan • Design study published July 2002 • Little support from KEK management • Based on FFAGs

  10. View from……Japan

  11. View from……Japan

  12. View from……Japan Staging Physics outcomes at each stage • High Power Proton Driver • Muon g-2 • Muon Factory (PRISM) • Muon LFV • Muon Factory-II (PRISM-II) • Muon EDM • Neutrino Factory • Based on 1 MW proton beam • Neutrino Factory-II • Based on 4.4 MW proton beam • Muon Collider

  13. View from……Japan My interpretation of conclusions • Would support a world-wide design study • Concern expressed about overlap due to FFAGs • Would prefer some level of overlap for active participation • Timescale depends on J-PARCnu, LC, etc

  14. View from……..US Two feasibility studies so far in US FS1: • Instigated by FNAL director • MC invited to participate • Focus was on feasibility • First attempt to specify NF from end-to-end • Design based on (reasonably) well understood technology • No attempt to optimise cost • Cost was a deliverable • Feasibility was established • Performance poor, costs high

  15. View from……..US FS2: • Collaboration between MC and BNL director • BNL managers able to draw on resources • Goal: maintain feasibility, but improve performance • Cost optimisation again given lower priority • Performance: 6x Study I • Cost: 75% (but only one RLA) • Still too high

  16. View from……..US FS3: • Need to reduce cost • Much progress already: Neuffer RF phase rotation FFAG ring or VRCS Ring coolers • Need to look for optimum between Proton driver Cooling Acceleration Detector • But much better if world-wide study • Possible host site (MICE): RAL

  17. Discussion Should there be a world-wide design study? Yes How should we proceed? Create a steering group US: Steve Geer Bob PalmerMike Zisman Japan: Yoshi Kuno Yoshi Mori Kenso Nakamura Europe: Alain Blondel(?) Rob Edgecock Helmut Haseroth What should be included? Accelerator and detector Name? WDS1(?)

  18. Discussion Timescale? Format? Host laboratory? Aim? Etc…..

More Related