1 / 46

Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I

Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I. Magnetic Methods (IV). tom.h.wilson tom.wilson@mail.wvu.edu. Department of Geology and Geography West Virginia University Morgantown, WV. On tap for the day. Brief review of the gravity lab Go over the magnetics problems

kdevore
Download Presentation

Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I Magnetic Methods (IV) tom.h.wilson tom.wilson@mail.wvu.edu Department of Geology and Geography West Virginia University Morgantown, WV Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

  2. On tap for the day • Brief review of the gravity lab • Go over the magnetics problems • Use of simple geometrical objects for magnetic anomaly analysis • In class problem • Some additional problems for discussion • Magnetics lab with lab worksheet Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

  3. The anomaly should be negative since the density contrast is negative. The residual has to be shifted into the negative so it is consistent with defined density contrasts +2 0… -2 -4.0+ Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

  4. The anomaly over short valleys is less than that over infinitely long ones Valleys extend in and out to infinity Valleys extend in and out 1000 ft Decreasing valley extent to ± 100 feet reduces the anomaly much further Valley has to be even deeper to get a good match between calculations and observations (640 to 672) Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

  5. Near the deepest point in the model valley, the anomaly reads -1.18 mg If we adjust the anomalies to accurately reflect the influence of the negative density contrast we get a negative anomaly equal to …… Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

  6. Problem 7.1 7.1 What is the horizontal gradient in nT/m of the Earth’s vertical field (ZE) in an area where the horizontal field (HE) equals 20,000 nT and the Earth’s radius is 6.3 x 108 cm. On Tuesday during the last week of class, we’ll work through some problems that will help you review materials we’ve covered on magnetic fields. Some of the problems are not too much different from those we worked for gravitational fields and so will help initiate some review of gravity methods. Between now and next Tuesday complete the questions below. We will get you started today. Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

  7. Problem 7.1 The relationship between the potential and field intensity requires use of the minus sign. However, no minus sign is required when computing the derivative or gradient Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

  8. Again – just take the simple derivative to get the gradient (no negative sign) To answer this problem we must evaluate the horizontal gradient of the vertical component - or Can you do it? Relationship is defined in the text Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

  9. A simple question (reference formula 7.2) Problem 7.2. The magnetic field intensity of a dipole is given as Offer a mathematical argument to show that the field intensity near one end of a long magnetic dipole (for example that produced by well casing) is nearly equal to that of an isolated magnetic pole. r- and r+refer to the distances from the point of observation to the negative and positive poles of the dipole, respectively. p denotes the pole strength. Hint: one of the poles will be at a much greater distance from the surface than the other. Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

  10. A typical use for back of the envelope computations … Can you find it? 7.3 A buried stone wall constructed from volcanic rocks has a susceptibility contrast of 0.001cgs emu with its enclosing sediments. The main field intensity at the site is 55,000nT. Determine the wall's detectability with a typical proton precession magnetometer. Assume the magnetic field produced by the wall can be approximated by a vertically polarized horizontal cylinder. Refer to figure below, and see following formula for Zmax. Background noise at the site is roughly 5nT. Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

  11. Is the wall detectable? Vertically Polarized Horizontal Cylinder Problem 7.3 Maximum field strength Remember this kind of formulization used in gravity General form Normalized shape term Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

  12. Problem 7.3 Vertically Polarized Horizontal Cylinder Maximum field strength recall 1.5m k=0 k = 0.001, FE= 55,000 nT k=0.001 0.5m What is R? 1.0m Approximate cross sectional area of rectangular wall in circular form and solve for R: i.e. Cross sectional area of wall = 1m x 0.5m Lastly – what is z? Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

  13. Abandoned well or underground storage tank In your survey area you encounter two magnetic anomalies, both of which form nearly circular patterns in map view. These anomalies could be produced by a variety of objects, but your understanding of the local issues suggests two possibilities: the anomalies are due to • a concentrated, roughly equidemensionally shaped object (a sphere); or • a long vertically oriented cylinder. Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

  14. Choose your SGO The well: Vertically Polarized Vertical Cylinder Look familiar? Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

  15. Equidimensional object? Vertical Magnetic Anomaly Vertically Polarized Sphere (see section 7.5.4) Simple geometrical objects As a function of x/z … The notation can be confusing at times. In the above, consider H = FE= intensity of earth’s magnetic field at the survey location. Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

  16. Non-text question Sphere or vertical cylinder Vertical cylinder sphere ZA is magnetic field intensity at some particular point of interest, for example at a point where Z is ½ the maximum value Zmax or ¼ or ¾. Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

  17. Some review – how do we get diagnostic positions? At what point (x/z) does the anomaly fall to ½ its maximum value? Let so Remember doing this with the gravity anomaly associated with a spherically distributed density distribution? Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

  18. The anomaly over a magnetized vertical cylinder has the same shape as gravity anomaly over a sphere and we could solve for z as x1/2 is referred to as a diagnostic position. It’s the distance (from the anomaly peak) to the point on the surface where the anomaly drops to ½ of its maximum value. 1.305 is referred to as the depth index multiplier. Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

  19. We could solve this equation for any diagnostic position For example – the point where the anomaly falls to 1/4th of it’s maximum value: then The diagnostic position is x¼ (the distance from the peak to the point where the anomaly drops to 1/4th its maximum value); the depth index multiplier is 0.81. Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

  20. Each diagnostic position gives you an estimate of z (depth to object). See class handout 1.2m 1.9m 2.8m Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

  21. This also gives you a way to test whether the anomaly is produced by a sphere (isolated dipole) or vertical cylinder (isolated pole). Take a few minutes and evaluate 1.2m 1.9m 2.8m Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

  22. Well casing or UST … is determined by finding which of the two possible objects under consideration give the most consistent estimates of z. Accuracy in your diagnostic positions make a big difference! Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

  23. Another twist on the abandoned well problem Given that derive an expression for the radius, where I = kHE. Compute the depth to the top of the casing for the anomaly shown below, and then estimate the radius of the casing assuming k = 0.1 and HE=55000nT. Zmax (62.2nT from graph below) is the maximum vertical component of the anomalous field produced by the vertical casing. Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

  24. Manipulate to solve for R… You have k = 0.1 and HE=55000nT, Zmax = 62.2nT. what else do you need and how do you get it? Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

  25. Some questions and activities to help you summarize the magnetics lab activity See class handout Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

  26. The gravitational field over the area helps define bedrock configuration Now that it’s known … Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

  27. We know the contribution of bedrock to the magnetic field Bedrock related magnetic anomaly Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

  28. Where are the drums? Magnetic anomaly not explained by bedrock From the bedrock Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

  29. Inversion will give you a solution, but it may be, and most likely will be, an incorrect representation of region enclosing the buried drums Pancake solution Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

  30. anomaly non-uniqueness and the drum cluster Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

  31. How many drums? Area of one drum ~ 4 square feet What’s wrong with the format of this plot? The x and y scaling has to be 1:1! Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

  32. The magnetic field varies as1/r3 Dipole anomalies fade out quickly with increases in depth Anomaly at 500, 1000, 2000m What happens when you double, … quadruple the distance? Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

  33. Some questions and activities to help you summarize the magnetics lab activity Bring in for discussion on Thursday .. See class handout Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

  34. Choice of sample interval is an important survey design issue In general, your sample interval should be no greater than X1/2. But don’t forget that equivalent solutions with shallower origins do exist! Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

  35. Sampling X1/2=Z/2 How often would you have to sample to detect this drum? Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

  36. oops! …. how about this one? The anomaly of the drum drops to ½ at a distance = ½ the depth. Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

  37. A practical survey design issue You are asked to run a magnetic survey to detect a buried drum. What spacing do you use between observation points? $$ Reliability If the depth to the center of the drum is expected to be about 3 meters then we’d want to have a minimum sample interval of 1.5 meters. This choice is based on the half-max relationship for the buried dipole Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

  38. Detailed list of diagnostic positions - dipole i. e. buried magnetic dipole You can usually make quick work of it an use only three diagnostic positions (red above) Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

  39. Vertical cylinder Again, we can get by with only three diagnostic positions (red above) Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

  40. Summary example … It’s all about using diagnostic positions and the depth index multipliers for each geometry. Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

  41. X3/4 X1/2 X1/4 0.9 1.55 2.45 diagnostic distance Sphere vs. Vertical Cylinder; z = __________ The depth 2.17 1.31 0.81 1.95 2.03 2.00 3.18 2 1.37 2.86 3.1 3.35 2.86 3.1 3.35 1.95 2.03 2.00 Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

  42. gmax g3/4 g1/2 g1/4 5.01 5.0 5.07 Sphere or cylinder? 5.08 5 5.1 3.47 3.28 3.00 Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

  43. Spend the remainder of the class looking over the lab review sheet And avoid the flattened drum cluster Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

  44. Reminders • Magnetic papers are in the mail room • Work on problems 7-1 through 7-3. They will be due this Thursday, December 5th and returned for review on December 10th • Magnetic paper summaries are also due on December 5th • Magnetics lab summary and news article are due on the 10th • We will have two final exam review sessions: December 5th and December 10th, this Thursday and next Tuesday • Final is from 3-5pm on December 13th. Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

  45. Regular section submissionsMagnetics All those in the regular section submit paper copies of your paper summaries and lab reports. Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

  46. Writing Section reminders(electronic submissions only) • Self-reviewed magnetic methods paper summary (only one) is due on December 5th. • The self-reviewed magnetics article is due on December 10th. All those in the writing section submit their papers and lab electronically. Don’t forget to turn on track changes while doing your self-reviews. Only submit the self-reviewed file. Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

More Related