1 / 9

This is a presentation of colleagues from the

This is a presentation of colleagues from the Masaryk University Brno - Institute of Physics of the Earth presented by Peter Melichar. Institute of Physics of the Earth at Masaryk University Brno www.ipe.muni.cz. • 14 people - seismologists, geologists, engineers

keagan
Download Presentation

This is a presentation of colleagues from the

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. This is a presentation of colleagues from the Masaryk University Brno - Institute of Physics of the Earth presented by Peter Melichar

  2. Institute of Physics of the Earth • at Masaryk University Brnowww.ipe.muni.cz • • 14 people - seismologists, geologists, engineers • • developing since 1981, joined with university in 1992 • • seismological monitoring, basic + applied research and teaching • some of us to be involved: J. Pazdirkova, R. Hanzlova, P. Spacek & J. Svancara – the boss Jana Romana Petr Jan

  3. Our infrastructure • • 3 networks of SP stations(green) for monitoring of local seismicity and nuclear power plants • • 4 broadband stations (red) - data for National Service and ZAMG, GEOFON, CTBTO, EMSC, ORFEUS, NEIC, ...

  4. Seismicity extends from the Alpine-Carpathian/Panonian region (ALCAPA) to its foreland. The Bohemian Massif acts as a buffer zone of „stable“ Europe. instrumentally recorded events for period 2000-2009 (the black/grey dots are Cenozoic anorogenic volcanics) Only weak tectonic activity with locally increased seismicity Max. instrumental M=4.6 Max. historical I~7.5-8

  5. Some general ideas for the Bohemian Massif • the stress/strain transfer from the active parts of ALCAPA to the adjacent low-seismicity regions should be studied • we have 2 nuclear power plants and growing community of seismic hazard sceptics around – we need to re-evaluate • catalogues should be revised and completed for earthquakes with long recurrence periods • geological record must be used for that – paleoseismology (see the first striking results of Czech and Austrian colleagues) • information on fault slip rate needed - conventional geodesy indicates an active fault slip

  6. Our activities and problems to be addressed: • • instrumental seismic data, incl. strong motion data – recording, processing, exchange (Romana, Jana) • • catalogue of instrumental events since 2000 incl. fakes (Jana) • • seismotectonic studies at ALCAPA/Bohemian Massif junction (all of us) • ? improvement of seismic station coverage (coop. with ZAMG?) • • completion of historical catalogues, joint catalogue for Central Europe? (Jana – coop. w. Christa and others) • • paleoseismology and geological input into seismic hazard issues (Petr) • ? satellite geodesy – PSInSAR (Petr would welcome help here – no experience, cooperation needed)

  7. Trenching the faults in the Boh. Massif– an example (P. Spacek, 2013) loam – resedimented upper loess? (Holocene) relic of paleosol 11.94±0.17 ky (14C) OSL datings not available yet,assumedage of top loess: last glacial 160+ cm slip on this young normal fault! (Primary tectonic origin + creep-like response of the slope.) loess + colluvia layered loess/red-brown silt 1x1m grid

More Related