1 / 44

A Flow Network Modeling (FNM) Tool MacroFlow TM for Improving Productivity of the Design of Complex Flow Systems Kanchan

A Flow Network Modeling (FNM) Tool MacroFlow TM for Improving Productivity of the Design of Complex Flow Systems Kanchan M. Kelkar, Ph. D. Principal Engineer kelkar@inres.com. Outline. Overview of the Design Process and the Role of FNM Theory of FNM Demonstration of MacroFlow

keala
Download Presentation

A Flow Network Modeling (FNM) Tool MacroFlow TM for Improving Productivity of the Design of Complex Flow Systems Kanchan

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. A Flow Network Modeling (FNM) Tool MacroFlowTM for Improving Productivity of the Design of Complex Flow Systems Kanchan M. Kelkar, Ph. D. Principal Engineer kelkar@inres.com

  2. Outline • Overview of the Design Process and the Role of FNM • Theory of FNM • Demonstration of MacroFlow • Validation of FNM Results • Applications and Case studies • Hands-on Session

  3. Typical Challenges in the Design of Complex Flow Systems • Blower/Pump Sizing • Flow Balancing • Filter Degradation • Bypass Effect • Manifold Maldistribution • Valve Selection • Minimizing Pressure Loss • Tube Sizing • etc.

  4. The technique of Flow Network Modeling (FNM)as incorporated in MacroFlow enables you to analyze many design options accurately in a very short time.MacroFlow is a productivity tool. Objective of the Presentation

  5. Real System – Exhaust System of a Dump Truck Flow Network Modeling is the only feasible technique

  6. Modeling Options for System Design • Hand Calculations (HC) • Tedious and very limited • Spreadsheets (SS) • System-specific, inflexible, and time intensive • Flow Network Modeling (FNM) • Simple, fast, and accurate • Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) • Time intensive for model definition, solution, and postprocessing • Suitable for component analysis, not suitable for system-level design

  7. What is Flow Network Modeling? • Flow systems are like electrical circuits. • Just as a voltage drop drives a current, a pressure drop creates fluid flow. • The flow distribution through different flow paths depends upon their flow resistances. • A flow system can be represented as a network of flow resistances. This approach is called Flow Network Modeling (FNM).

  8. A Network for a Piping System

  9. FNM of Complex Flow Systems • A network model of the flow system is constructed by identifying flow paths through filters, screens, bends, tees, blowers/pumps, valves, orifices, etc. • The flow resistance relationships can be obtained from handbooks, vendor specs, in-house testing, or CFD analysis. • The flow rates, pressures, and temperatures throughout the system are calculated by solving mass, momentum, and energy equations.

  10. Advantages of the FNM Technique • FNM is simple, fast, and accurate • Simple because it is modular and object-oriented • Fast because it uses overall characteristics • Accurate because characteristics are empirically determined

  11. Limitations of FNM • The flow system must be described in terms of identifiable flow paths with definable resistance characteristics. • FNM provides gross (rather than detailed) predictions: • FNM solution does not give local velocity vectors, flow separation, reattachment, etc. • Detailed temperature distributions, local heat fluxes, etc. are not calculated. • Accurate resistance correlations are needed for reliable prediction.

  12. Complementary Nature of FNM and CFD • FNM allows focused and efficient use of CFD • Examine hundreds of design alternatives by FNM (Conceptual Design) and select a few promising designs for CFD analysis (Detailed Design). • Use FNM for an entire system and provide boundary conditions for the CFD analysis of a subsystem. • Use of CFD at the component level for determining the flow resistances enhances the accuracy of the to the FNM technique. • Complementary use of System Analysis and CFD results in • A comprehensive set of tools for complex flow systems. • Shorter design cycle

  13. Time Required to Analyze a Typical System Setup Time Run Time FNM 1 Hour 10 Seconds By using FNM, you save a substantial amount of design engineer’s time

  14. HC Testing FNM CFD Testing FNM Testing Thermal Design Process Conventional and Enhanced Conventional Test-Based Enhanced FNM-Based

  15. 2 1 Modified Bernoulli’s Equation For constant density and no gravity head: p1 + V12/2 = p2 + V22/2 + Losses The losses are due to viscous forces, flow separation, expansion/contraction, bends, etc. Losses = K(V2/2)where K is the loss coefficient. Thus, P = P1 - P2 = K(V2/2)

  16. Flow Resistance P = P1 - P2 = K(V2/2) Q = VA  P = K( Q2) / (2A2) Flow resistance: P /Q = (K Q) / (2A2)(nonlinear) • The values of K are available for screens, orifices, bends, expansion/contraction, T-junctions, etc. • For electronics cooling, the K values are needed for card arrays, heat sinks, power supplies, etc.

  17. Flow Resistance Flow resistance correlations for various flow geometries are given in: • Idelchik, I.E., Handbook of Hydraulic Resistance, CRC Press, Florida, 1994. • Blevins, R.D., Fluid Dynamics Handbook, Krieger Publishing Company, 1984. • Miller, D.S., Internal Flow Systems, Gulf Publishing Company, Texas, 1990.

  18. Flow Resistance of a Duct p2 Friction factor: f = p (D/L) / (V2/2) Thus, K = f L/D • For duct flows, f is a well-established function of the Reynolds number Re and surface roughness. Re = VD/, where  = viscosity and D = hydraulic diameter = (4)(area)/perimeter p1 D L

  19. Flow Through an Area Change (The color shows total pressure) • For an abrupt expansion: K = (1 - A1/A2)2 • For an abrupt contraction: K = 0.5 (1 - A2/A1)

  20. p Qmax Q Flow Induced by Fans • Whereas flow resistances cause a drop in pressure, a fan creates a rise in pressure. • The pressure rise p produced by a fan depends on the flow rate Q. • This relationship is expressed by the fan performance curve.

  21. system resistance fan curve p operating point Q System Operating Point • What flow rate we get is determined by the intersection of the system resistance and fan performance curves. • If the resulting Q is not acceptable, you reduce the system resistance, choose a different fan, or use multiple fans in series or parallel.

  22. Ta2 Ta1 h1 h2 A B C Overall Thermal Resistance • For heat transfer through a composite solid from the hot fluid at Ta1 to the cold fluid at Ta2 Overall Resistance = 1/h1A + (L/kA)A + (L/kA)B + (L/kA)C + 1/h2A Heat flow: q = (Ta1 - Ta2)/ overall resistance q

  23. Heat Transfer in FNM • Solve the flow equations to get the flow rates through individual components. • For a known heat load in a component: • Calculate the exit fluid temperature as: Tout = Tin + (q / mcp ) • Use a suitable correlation to get the heat transfer coefficient h for the calculated flow rate. • Then calculate Twall from: (Twall -Tout) / (Twall -Tin) = exp (- hA /mcp ) • •

  24. Heat Transfer in FNM (continued) • For heat loss from the fluid within a component to the ambient fluid: • Calculate the overall heat transfer coefficient U as: U = [(1/hinside) + (L/k)wall + (1/houtside)]-1 • Obtain the exit fluid temperature from: Tout - Tamb = (Tin - Tamb) exp (- UA / mcp ) • Get the heat loss as: q = mcp (Tout - Tin) • •

  25. FNM for System Design • FNM empowers the design engineer • to visualize the flow behavior of the entire system • to predict system-wide effects of a design change • to identify performance-limiting components • to quickly evaluate different physical layouts • to explore many available design options • to perform “what-if” studies • to avoid costly design changes later in the cycle • to meet tight design schedules

  26. MacroFlowTMA Flow Network Modeling Tool for the Design of Flow Systems

  27. Capabilities of MacroFlow • An integrated and easy-to-use GUI for network construction, solution control, and display of results • A comprehensive component library for modeling complex flow systems • Customizable and expandable structure • Robust and efficient direct solution technique • Steady/unsteady, Incompressible/compressible flow and heat transfer • Input and output in mixed units • Comprehensive post-processing in terms of plots, tables, animation

  28. MF Demonstration of MacroFlow • Ease of use • Speed of execution • Flexibility and user control • Expandable and customizable structure • Tool for enhanced productivity

  29. Flow through an “S” Manifold

  30. Flow through an “S” Manifold Comparison with Experimental Data

  31. Flow through a “U” Manifold

  32. Flow through a “U” Manifold Comparison with Experimental Data

  33. Exhaust System of a Dump Truck – Physical System

  34. Exhaust System – The Design Problem Design Goals: • Minimize the back pressure while recovering waste heat Technical Approach: • Large size and widely different length scales made CFD analysis of the entire system impractical • Use of MacroFlow at the system level and CFD for localized analysis of complex regions

  35. Exhaust System – Flow Network Model

  36. Exhaust System – Design Cycle • MacroFlow-based analysis indicated regions of system with large pressure losses. • CFD analysis was used to optimize the local geometry (e.g. gradual expansion instead of a sudden expansion) and to determine the flow characteristics for use in MacroFlow. • The final design met the stipulated backpressure requirements. • MacroFlow enabled scientific analysis during the design process and resulted in an order-of-magnitude reduction in the associated costs.

  37. Liquid Cooling System for Automatic Test Equipment Manifold System Liquid Cooling Module

  38. ATE System – The Design Problem Design Goals: • Achieve a uniform distribution of flow to each LCM Design Iterations: • Selected the tube sizes for the main and the side branches • Determined the orifice sizes in the individual branches for flow balancing • Sized the pump for the cooling system

  39. Liquid Cooling System – Characteristics of One LCM A Single LCM Flow Characteristics

  40. Liquid Cooling - Flow Network Model for the Complete System

  41. Liquid Cooling System – Distribution of Flow rates in One Branch of the Manifold

  42. Why use MacroFlow? • Each design option can be analyzed very quickly and accurately. • Further, 80% of the design problems can be analyzed in 10% of the time relative to conventional techniques. • Complementary use with CFD results in a powerful design methodology. • The resulting cost savings and the quality improvements far outweigh the investment in MacroFlow usage.

  43. Engineering Applications of MacroFlow • Electronics Cooling • Telecommunications • Computer • Avionics • Peripheral Equipment • Semiconductor Processing • Gas and Liquid Distribution Systems • Automobile • Intake and Exhaust Manifolds • Engine Cooling Systems

  44. Closing Remarks • Flow Network Modeling is a simple, fast, and accurate methodology for the design of complex flow systems. • The promise of FNM is delivered by MacroFlowthrough its ease of use, flexible and customizable structure, speed of execution, and comprehensive post-processing. • Use of MacroFlow substantially shortens the design cycle and significantly improves the productivity of the design engineer.

More Related