1 / 12

A manifesto by Group 7

A manifesto by Group 7. What we sample at MOR , a great reflection of the upper mantle, is not the whole mantle , as it does not add up to chondritic conditions This is not to say there are two reservoirs This is not to say there are two layers

Download Presentation

A manifesto by Group 7

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. A manifesto by Group 7

  2. What we sample at MOR, a great reflection of the upper mantle, is not the whole mantle, as it does not add up to chondritic conditions • This is not to say there are two reservoirs • This is not to say there are two layers • Resolve paradox between geochemistry and seismology: find reservoir. Seismologists, give us a reservoir, delineate it. Let’s look for a sharp, non-horizontal boundary around D’’

  3. The Earth SciencesA haiku by James B. Kellogg

  4. If not primitive – what? • If not 670 – where ? • If not primordial – how? • If not us – who?

  5. Some facts we’re comfortable stating

  6. Zircon cannot be produced in the mantle; finding it in a plume implies it came from a subducted slab • Plume melting occurs maybe around 100 km, certainly not 500 km or deeper; we know this from garnet trace elements • What if mass transfer is unimpeded but chemical variations are? Diffusion needs to be faster than advection. This does not explain Sm/Nd isotopes, if anything

  7. A modest proposal • Geodynamics: tell us what plumes look like, how fast they go, viscosity contrast • Geochemists: tell us what they’re likely to be made of • Mineral physicists: tell us what the wave speeds of those will be • Seismologists: prove that you can see them, and take their picture

  8. What we need • We need experimental mineral physics to tell us the effect of physical variables on wave speeds at depths and pressures • We need geodynamics that tell us whether boundary layers are possible at depths other than the CMB and whether the types of structures seen seismically are any good • We need first-principles calculations of trace elements in small concentrations require huge unit cells; simulating liquids is even harder

  9. Some more questions we want answers to

  10. What kind of heat transfer is going on as a slab goes down, and we need to know physical constants (diffusivity, etc.) • What are the thermal properties of “slab” and “mantle” • What happens at the bottom of the mantle? • What do slabs really think? • How do melts interacts physically and chemically with the mantle • Is the mantle layered, and why, when

  11. Geodynamicists: use the seismic models, look for what they mean • Mineral physics: step away from the idealized end-member solutions, and completely understand melting etc. • Find how seismic velocity variations map presence of partial melt; find pressure and depth variations of said velocities

  12. Headlines • Area geophysicist develops infallible toolset to detect melt and volatiles anywhere in the mantle • Seismologist confirms that slabs lose sharpness and definition in the lower mantle • Earth scientists maps complete thermochemical structure of D’’ • Wadati-Benioff zone explained

More Related