140 likes | 344 Views
PACT trial. Ross AM, et al. J Amer Coll Cardiol 1999;34:1954-1962. Reperfusion and LV function: rtPA vs placebo. PACT trial. Ross AM, et al. J Amer Coll Cardiol 1999;34:1954-1962. Adverse clinical outcomes: rtPA vs placebo. PACT trial. Ross AM, et al. J Amer Coll Cardiol 1999;34:1954-1962.
E N D
1. Clinical Trial Commentary Dr Eric Topol
Chairman and Professor, Department of Cardiology Director of the Joseph J Jacobs Center for Thrombosis and Vascular Biology at the Cleveland Clinic
Dr Robert Califf
Professor of Cardiology
Associate Vice Chancellor for
Clinical Research at Duke University
5. “The bottom line is that the combination therapy did not improve LV function or change outcome…Enhancing reperfusion by 10, 15, or 20 minutes hasn’t proven to be an added benefit. So why would you adopt that type of therapy?”
Dr Cindy Grines
William Beaumont Hospital, Detroit
6. MUSTT trial eligibility criteria
7. MUSTT:protocol
8. MUSTT results
9. MUSTT and implantable defibrillators
10. Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial (SCD-HeFT): randomization
11. SCD-HeFT eligibility criteria
12. SCD-HeFT endpoints
13. “…it is an implantable device. But if we had these results in a study looking at aspirin, do you really think we'd be sitting here arguing over would I withhold aspirin therapy from a defined sub-risk group…what we're really talking about here is economics, that's the bottom line.”
Dr Eric Prystowski
St Vincent Hospital
14. CABG Patch trial eligibility criteria
15. CABG Patch results