1 / 27

Colonic stenting for intestinal obstruction due to left colon and rectal cancer Dr Sherman Lam

Colonic stenting for intestinal obstruction due to left colon and rectal cancer Dr Sherman Lam TKOH JHSGR 26 April 2014. Outline of presentation. Introduction Colonic stenting Indication/contra-indication Efficacy Complication Evidence Palliation Bridge to elective surgery Conclusion.

kedem
Download Presentation

Colonic stenting for intestinal obstruction due to left colon and rectal cancer Dr Sherman Lam

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Colonic stenting for intestinal obstruction due to left colon and rectal cancer Dr Sherman Lam TKOH JHSGR 26 April 2014

  2. Outline of presentation • Introduction • Colonic stenting • Indication/contra-indication • Efficacy • Complication • Evidence • Palliation • Bridge to elective surgery • Conclusion

  3. Introduction

  4. Colorectal cancer Hong Kong cancer registry 2011

  5. Acute malignant colonic obstruction • 7-30% of all colorectal carcinoma • 70% left side • right side: • emergency (extended) right hemicolectomy with ileo-colic anastomosis • left side: (at or distal to splenic flexure) • no optimal treatment Waldron. et al. Br J Surg 1986

  6. Obstructed left side colonic cancer (OLCC) Ansaloni et al. World Journal of Emergency Surgery 2010

  7. Emergency operation • Higher morbidity and mortality than elective operation: • Morbidity: 39% vs 23% • Mortality: 12% vs 3.5% • Primary resection and anastomosis carried high clinical leakage rate of 18% compared with 6% in elective surgery • High stoma rate (up to 50%) Leitman IM et. al. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1992 Tekkis et al. Ann Surg. 2004 Deans et al. Br J Surg. 1994 Phillips et al. Br J Surg. 1985

  8. Impact of stoma • Stoma creation is associated with high complication of 34% • impaired quality of life • Up to 30% of stomas were not reversed • Stoma closure is associated with mortality of 7%, morbidity 37%, leakage 3% Park et al. Dis Colon Rectum. 1999 Nugent et al. Dis Colon Rectum. 1999 Deans et al. Br J Surg. 1994

  9. Obstructed left side colonic cancer (OLCC) Ansaloni et al. World Journal of Emergency Surgery 2010

  10. Colonic stenting

  11. Colonic stenting • Dohmoto, 1991 • Palliative intent • 19 non-resectable or metastatic rectal cancer • Successful rate 84%, half alive with no recurrent obstruction in 6 months • Tejero, 1994 • Bridge to elective surgery • 2 cases M. Dohmoto et al Surgical Endoscopy 1996 Tejero et al. Dis Colon Rectum 1994

  12. Colonic stenting • Indications: • Palliation • Bridge to elective surgery • Contra-indications: • Evidence of perforation (clinical/radiological)

  13. Efficacy • Technical success rate: 96% • Clinical success rate: 92% • Median duration of stent patency: 106 days (68-288 days) Watt et al. Ann Surg 2007

  14. Complications • Severe pain 5% • Bleeding 5% • 0.5% need blood transfusion Khot et al. Br J Surg 2002 Rahul et al. Abdom Imaging 2008 Suzuki et al. Dis Col Rec 2004

  15. Complications • Perforation 4% • 2% in non-balloon dilatation vs 10% in balloon dilatation • Stent migration 10% • most frequent within 1st week • technical factors, chemotherapy • Re-obstruction 10% • tumour overgrowth, tumour ingrowth, migration, fecal impaction • Mortality 1% Khot et al. Br J Surg 2002 Rahul et al. Abdom Imaging 2008 Suzuki et al. Dis Col Rec 2004

  16. Evidence

  17. Palliation • Compared to emergency surgery • hospital stay • shorter • stoma creation? • lower • same Law et al. Br J Surg 2003 Xinopulos et al. Surg Endosc 2004 Fiori et al. Anticancer Res 2004 Sagar et al. Cochrane 2011 Law et al. Br J Surg 2003 Tilney et al. Surg Endosc 2007 Ye GY et al. World J Gastroenterol 2012

  18. Palliation • Compared to emergency surgery • morbidity/mortality ? • lower • same Lee et al. Am J Surg 2012 Dionigi G et al. Surg Oncol 2007 Ye et al. World J Gastroenterol 2012 Sagar et al. Cochrane 2011

  19. Bridge to elective surgery • Compared to emergency surgery • primary anastomosis • higher Cheung HYS et al. Arch Surg 2009 Cennamo et al. Int J Colorectal Dis 2013 Tan et al. Br J Surg 2012 Zhang et al. Surg Endosc 2012 Dastur et al. Tech Coloproctol 2008

  20. Bridge to elective surgery • Compared to emergency surgery • stoma ? • lower • same Cennamo et al. Int J Colorectal Dis 2013 Tan et al. Br J Surg 2012 Kavanagh et al. Dis Colon Rectum 2013 Pirlet et al. Surg Endosc 2011

  21. Bridge to elective surgery • Compared to emergency surgery • morbidity/mortality ? • lower • higher Ghazal et al. J Gastrointest Surg 2013 Alcantara et al. World J Surg 2011 Ho et al. Int J Colorectal Dis 2012 Zhang et al. Surg Endosc 2012 Tan et al. Br J Surg 2012

  22. Bridge to elective surgery • Compared to emergency surgery • Survival • no significant difference in 3-yr survival (50% vs. 48%) or 5-yr survival (44% vs. 40%) • no significant difference in 3-yr survival (48% vs. 46%) • no significant difference in 5-yr survival (60% vs 58%) Martinez C et al. Dis Colon Rectum 2002 J.K. Dastur et al. Tech Coloproctol 2008 Knight AL et al. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2012

  23. Bridge to elective surgery • Compared to emergency surgery • Survival • significant lower in 5-yr survival (30% vs 67%) Sabbagh C et al. Ann Surg 2013

  24. Bridge to elective surgery • Compared to emergency surgery • Local recurrence • higher local recurrence rate 32% vs 8% (median follow up 2.7 years) K. J. Gorissen et al. Br J Surg 2013

  25. Ongoing RCT trial • CReST (ColoRectal Stenting Trial) • UK trial • aims to recruit 400 patients over 3 years

  26. Conclusion • colonic stenting is safe and effective to relieve obstruction in left colon and rectal cancer in terms of short term outcome • for palliation • shorter hospital stay • conflicting evidence for stoma rate, morbidity/mortality • for bridge to elective surgery • more primary anastomosis • conflicting evidence for stoma rate, morbidity/mortality • long term survival same? worse?, local reccurrence higher?

  27. Thank you

More Related