1 / 61

Developing a Research Study Protocol “From an Idea to Implementation”

Developing a Research Study Protocol “From an Idea to Implementation”. Sadaf Aslam, MD Clinical Research Instructor USF Health, Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute July 18 th , 2012. What do we need to know?. Research terminology Basic study designs/research question

kedma
Download Presentation

Developing a Research Study Protocol “From an Idea to Implementation”

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Developing a Research Study Protocol“From an Idea to Implementation” Sadaf Aslam, MD Clinical Research Instructor USF Health, Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute July 18th, 2012

  2. What do we need to know? • Research terminology • Basic study designs/research question • Required elements of a research study protocol • Identify and avoid common mistakes • Understand PI, IRB and Institutional responsibility

  3. How is research defined? • Research “Systematic investigation including research development, testing and evaluation, designed to develop or contribute to a generalizable knowledge’ • Human Subject “A living individual about whom an investigator obtains data through intervention or interaction or through identifiable private information” Federal policy [45CFR46. 102(f)]

  4. What is Clinical Research? Breaking the Scientific Bottleneck Basic Sciences Research: Finding the cause of disease Translational Research: Making the results applicable to the population Clinical Research : Patient oriented research-studies on mechanisms of disease, therapies and intervention, new technology and includes clinical trials Epidemiological and behavioral studies Outcomes and Health services research (NIH ) Association of American Medical Colleges American Medical Association

  5. Clinical Trials • Any prospective studies designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of new drug, device or any behavioral intervention mostly against a control -gold standard of clinical research • Any biomedical and health related study that follows a predefined protocol either by observation or intervention involving human subjects

  6. Clinical Trial-Phases Drug discovery Preclinical Animal and lab testing 20-30 healthy volunteers, for dosage n safety Phase I Phase II 100-300 patients for efficacy n side effects Phase III 1000-3000, mostly multi-center, efficacy and comparison with current t/m FDA review n approval process FDA Phase IV Post marketing and long term effects of drug 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 years

  7. All studies Descriptive Analytical Experimental Observational Surveys cross-sectional Qualitative case reports, case series RCTs Cohort Parallel Group Case Control Cross over Cross- sectional

  8. Getting started “The best time to contemplate the quality of evidence from a clinical trial is before it begins. Conceptualizing and designing good clinical trials is never an accident but results from careful planning” Clinical Trials: A Methodologic Perspective by Steven Piantadosi

  9. Main Steps 1: Formulating a research question 2: Drafting a study Protocol 3: Regulatory submission and Approval 4: Implementation

  10. Research Question - A research question is the starting point of all studies and addresses the uncertainty an investigator has and is trying to find an answer - Forms the foundation of your study - Must be specified before starting the analysis

  11. Origin of a research question • Published literature • Scholarship • Mentor • New ideas and techniques • Surroundings- clinical setting, grand rounds, journal clubs etc

  12. Types of Questions • Background Generally ask what, when, how, where …about the disease, disorder, or treatment • Foreground Patient oriented questions cover specific aspects with interpretation of therapy, disease, prognosis, diagnostic, risk etc and give answers based on outcome

  13. A 30-year-old woman presents with progressive weakness of both legs. She has difficulty in walking, climbing stairs, and standing up from a sitting position. A diagnosis is made of "demyelinating disease of the central nervous system" and intravenous methylprednisolone is prescribed. The patient is informed that her symptoms and test results will be monitored over time. She wants to know what her chances are of developing multiple sclerosis (MS) in the next few years.

  14. A 37-year-old pregnant woman comes to the clinic for a routine checkup. This is her second pregnancy. She had her first child when she was 35 years old and had an amniocentesis at 18 weeks to test for Down syndrome. The amniocentesis was negative. She is currently 8 weeks pregnant and would like to know of any abnormalities. An ultrasound can be done in the first trimester for diagnosing Down syndrome, but it is unknown if the results are as reliable as the conventional test of amniocentesis.

  15. In elderly patients with heart failure with an ejection fraction of 40%, is Quinapril effective in reducing the need for re-hospitalization?

  16. Key Concept • P- Population • I- Intervention • C- Control • O- Outcome

  17. Examples of a research question Is omega 3 fish oil beneficial for health? Changing it to hypothesis (prove or disprove) We hypothesize that taking omega 3 fish oil is beneficial for health Improved hypothesis: In post menopausal women, we hypothesize that women who take omega 3 fish oil will have a a lower risk of heart disease then those who don’t take it. Research Question: Does Omega 3 fish oil reduce the risk of CHD in post menopausal women?

  18. Should postmenopausal women receive hormones? Population: postmenopausal women Predictor: “hormones” Outcome: ? Changing it to hypothesis (prove or disprove) We hypothesize that taking hormones is beneficial for postmenopausal women Ref: Designing Clinical Research by Dr. Stephen Hulley

  19. Improved Research Question Does estrogen treatment prevent heart attacks in postmenopausal women? Population: postmenopausal women Predictor: estrogen treatment vs none Outcome: heart attacks Improved hypothesis: In post menopausal women, we hypothesize that women who take estrogen treatment will have a a lower risk of heart disease than those who don’t take it.

  20. Cohort design Population: - 5000 women age 55 and above living in the Tampa Bay Area Predictor: - Post-menopausal estrogen at baseline Outcome: - Follow-up 5-year incidence of heart attacks

  21. Case-control design Population - Cases: 100 women with heart attacks at TGH ED - Controls: 100 women matched age and demographics TGH ED Predictor: - Post-menopausal estrogen intake Outcome: - Heart attack in Cases vs controls

  22. Cross-sectional design Population: - 2000 women age 55+ seen at Women’s Health Center Predictor: - Taking post-menopausal estrogen? Outcome: - History of heart attack?

  23. Characteristics of a Research Question in Context of a Study Design: FINER • Feasible • Interesting • Novel • Ethical • Relevant Designing Clinical Research by Stephen Hulley

  24. Criteria for Feasibility • Adequate number of subjects • Knowledge and expertise • Adequate resources regarding time and money • If manageable in scope

  25. Criteria for Interesting • Depends on your passion, motivation • Something to be an expert in • Finding the truth and making a difference

  26. Criteria for Novelty • Comes from thoroughly reviewing the literature • Confirms or refutes previous findings • Extends previous findings • Provides new findings How to find Novelty? • Mastering the published literature-resources- EBM, Medline Ovid, pubmed • Perform systematic reviews and meta-analysis

  27. Critically reviewing literature!! • Introduction: Why did they initiate the research? • Methods: What did they do? • Results: What did they find? • Discussion: What do the results mean?

  28. Purpose of Thorough Literature Search Places other’s work in the context of its contribution to the topic and provides critical review If the research question is significant and the work is original and important Identifies new ways to interpret and find any gaps in previous research Identify areas of prior research to prevent duplication of effort Helps formulate your own research question and study

  29. Working with Literature • Find -types, resources, skills, knowledge • Manage – reading, keeping track, annotation • Use – research topic, question, justification, design, method • Review –writing background section, working on style n tone

  30. Criteria for Ethical • Respect for human subjects • Respect for confidentiality • Respect for informed consent • Respect for beneficence and justice

  31. Criteria for Relevance • To add on to scientific knowledge • To benefit clinic, public health or health policy • For future research directions

  32. The research cycle Formulate a research question Publish Literature search Systematic Review Infer conclusions Answer? Yes Answer? No Analyze results Design study Implement study

  33. Step 2: Drafting a study protocol

  34. Protocol • A study protocol is a formal document which leads to a systematic approach about the modes to conduct a study based on ethical, scientific and organizational grounds • A document that describes the objective, design, methodology, statistical consideration and organization of a trial (ICH definition)

  35. Outline of a study protocol • Title • Abstract/synopsis • Background/significance/rationale • Objectives/specific aims/research question • Study design/Methodology/Procedures • Informed consent process-confidentiality • Overall Management Plan • References

  36. 1: Title • Consistency across all documents 2: Abstract/Synopsis • Abstract- question, rationale, convenient reminder of the specifics of proposal for everyone specially some non scientific reviewers

  37. 3. Background/Introduction A: Known B: Unknown C: Research question- How the new information may add to what is already known Why this research needs to be carried out-Justification for the study D: Experimental approach-follows from question what you will do about your question Broad A Narrow B C D

  38. Example of Writing a Background Section: Title: The Effect of Dietary Omega-3 Fatty Acids on Coronary Atherosclerosis Ingestion of fish or other sources of Omega-3 fatty acids has been called a comprehensive strategy toward the prevention of atherosclerosis (1). Hundreds of epidemiologic studies, studies of mechanisms of action, and studies in experimental animals have shown that dietary intake of Omega-3 fatty acids has anti atherosclerotic potential (1–9)…….. However, only a few clinical trials have shown that Omega-3 fatty acids have cardiovascular benefit in humans…… To test the hypothesis that consuming Omega-3 fatty acids for 2 years leads to less progression and more regression of coronary atherosclerosis, as assessed by coronary angiography, we will conduct a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in patients with coronary atherosclerosis. April 1999 · Annals of Internal Medicine · Volume 130 · Number 7 Clemens von Schacky, MD; Peter Angerer, MD; Wolfgang Kothny, MD; Karl Theisen, MD; and Harald Mudra, MD

  39. 4. Objectives • Objective is the research question that needs to be answered based on the rationale or hypothesis • Each objective should have a corresponding discussion in the statistical section Primary Objective:To evaluate the effect of omega 3 fish oil in reducing the risk for CHD in post menopausal women Secondary Objective:To assess the effects of the Omega 3 fish oil with respect to 6 months and 12 months development of variables such as glucose, lipids, hormones, and BMI

  40. 5. Design and Methods Section Study design/methods Sample size Study subject selection/population Statistical Analysis Plan Data collection methods and Data management

  41. a) Study design/Methods • Descriptive: What is average number of servings of omega-3 fish oil per week in the diet of patients with a history of CHD ? • Analytical: Is there an association between fish oil and risk of developing CHD? • Clinical trial: Does treatment with omega 3 capsules reduce the incidence of CHD in diabetic patients? • Randomization /Blinding • Process of recruitment • Flow chart • Methods of measurement

  42. b) Sample Size • Provide the rationale for the sample size and the clinical justification • If sample size shows certain level of power and effect size (If phenomenon is rare, effect size will be small and more subjects are needed) • Sample size/power analysis

  43. c) Study Population /Selection of Subjects • Define Inclusion and exclusion criteria • If the selected population is appropriate to answer the RQ

  44. d) Statistical Plan Details of the plan- statistical test to test each hypothesis/expected data/ Coding Plan for any missing, spurious and unused data Procedures for reporting deviations from the original statistical plan Software you will be using for analysis

  45. e) Data collection/management and access • How the data collected will be analyzed to determine the health outcomes • Validity and reliability of the data collecting instrument • Describe the sources of the data in case of chart reviews

  46. 6. Informed consent Requires all essential elements and it’s a process

  47. Confidentiality • Must comply with the data protection act • Privacy and confidentiality (PHI- maintained by the covered entities) • De-identification of the data • In case of any communicable disease how to limit the reporting requirements

  48. 7. Overall Project management • Duration of your study and time line • Handling and storage of data • Reporting to participants, sponsors, community • Reporting of any conflict of interest • Identify any planned ways to present your results

  49. List all the references used in the background section or in the protocol text at the end of the protocol-use NIH format or endnote 8. References Attachments and Appendices Budget , PI’s–CV, certification, Data collection forms, request to access data, Site agreement, ICF, HIPAA waiver, amendments

  50. Step 3: Regulatory Submission and Approval • Department Review/ Scientific Review • IRB review-process • Site approval • COI Review

More Related