1 / 9

Using perfomance evaluation methods for cost /benefits analysis

Using perfomance evaluation methods for cost /benefits analysis. Cost /Benefit Analysis of Military Training 2012-06-06. Alexander Ahl Analyst MSc Computer Science FOI (2006) S econded OA to SwAF , 2006-. Camilla Andersson Deputy Research Director MSc Operations Research

kedma
Download Presentation

Using perfomance evaluation methods for cost /benefits analysis

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Usingperfomanceevaluationmethods for cost/benefits analysis Cost/Benefit AnalysisofMilitaryTraining 2012-06-06

  2. Alexander Ahl • Analyst • MSc Computer Science • FOI (2006) • Seconded OA toSwAF, 2006- • Camilla Andersson • Deputy Research Director • MSc Operations Research • MSc Physics • FOI (1997) • Seconded OA toSwAF, 2004-2007, 2009-2011

  3. Hypothis test Currently Sweden conducts continuous performance assessments, which allows us to track the unit’s development throughout its lifetime. How can this be used for cost/benefit analyses?

  4. Unitdevelopmentcycle 2 Years Training Predeployment Operation Recuperation Training

  5. Swedish TrainingConcept Performance Battalionwithbranches Battalion Battalion & Company Company & Platoon Platoon Basic Training Time

  6. Swedish TrainingConcept Performance Battalionwithbranches Battalion Battalion & Company Company & Platoon Platoon Basic Training Time

  7. Comparisons • Same unit different year • Same type of unit same year • Change in number of exercises • Change in type/quality of exercises • Investment/procurement • Simulation equipment • Increased number material

More Related