1 / 52

Juveniles Behind Bars: Meeting Treatment Needs Through a Statewide Academic and Correctional Managed Care Partnership

Juveniles Behind Bars: Meeting Treatment Needs Through a Statewide Academic and Correctional Managed Care Partnership. Academic & Health Policy Conference on Correctional Health Chicago March 22, 2013 Ohiana Torrealday, PhD CCHP Administrative Director, Mental Health-Youth Services

keelia
Download Presentation

Juveniles Behind Bars: Meeting Treatment Needs Through a Statewide Academic and Correctional Managed Care Partnership

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Juveniles Behind Bars: Meeting Treatment Needs Through a Statewide Academic and Correctional Managed Care Partnership Academic & Health Policy Conference on Correctional Health Chicago March 22, 2013 Ohiana Torrealday, PhD CCHP Administrative Director, Mental Health-Youth Services University of Texas Medical Branch-Correctional Managed Care Joseph Penn, MD CCHP Director of Mental Health University of Texas Medical Branch-Correctional Managed Care

  2. Acknowledgements University of Texas Medical Branch-Correctional Managed Care (CMC) Youth Services Pharmacy Services-University of Texas Medical Branch-CMC Amy Jo Harzke, DrPH, Jacques Baillargeon, PhD, Gwen Baillargeon, MS, Joseph Penn, MD (UTMB-CMC) Texas Juvenile Justice Department No Financial Disclosures

  3. Objectives • Discusspublic health issues, medical and mental health care evaluation and treatment needs of “high risk” youth who enter the juvenilecorrectional system; • Discuss increased challenge of covering a large geographic area while maintaining a high level of care and follow best practice in a cost-effective/conscious manner; • Discuss opportunities and challenges in the implementation of a statewide correctional health care system utilizing an academic and state agency partnership and funding model.

  4. Correctional Managed Care • A Strategic Partnership between: • The Texas Department of Criminal Justice • The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston • Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center • Focused upon a shared Mission: • To develop a statewide health care network that provides TDCJ offenders with timely access to a constitutional level of health care while also controlling costs • Managed by a statutorily established body: • The Correctional Managed Health Care Committee

  5. Correctional Managed Care (CMC) • CMC is a division of the University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB) community health services, established in 1994. • CMC divided into two sectors: TDCJ offenders served by UTMB (80% of population) and Texas Tech (20% of population). • Provides medical, dental, nursing, and mental health services to offenders within the Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ) • Provides medical, dental, nursing and psychiatric services to juvenile offenders in custody of the Texas Juvenile Justice Department (formerly TYC)

  6. Adult and Juvenile Correctional Units Served by UTMB-CMC

  7. Advantages for the Criminal and Juvenile Justice Systems • Provides statewide network of providers to cope with prison system expansion • Provides access to credible, quality health care • Assures medical management standards • Provides cost-effective services • Sharing of risk

  8. Correctional Managed Care (CMC)-Youth Services Mental Health Services Overview • Psychiatric diagnostic evaluations • Psychotropic medication management • Telepsychiatry • Evaluation for CSU admission • Emergency state hospital commitment evaluations • Unit, school based and off-site consultations • Clinical/case consultations • Psychopharmacological consultation • Psychotropic on-call/emergency services available statewide 24/7 • Discharge planning • Staff training and development on mental health issues

  9. Juvenile Justice Populationin Texas

  10. U.S. vs. Texas U.S. Juvenile Arrest Rates for All Crimes 6,318 arrests for every 100,000 youth 2.11 million arrests of juveniles in 2008 6,318 arrests for every 100,000 youth 2.11 million arrests of juveniles in 2008 1,161,830 million arrests of juveniles in 2009 134,575 youthful arrests in Texas In 2008 99,114 youthful arrests in Texas in 2011 www.txdps.sate.tx.us/crimereports *In TX, a juvenile is legally defined as a person under seventeen

  11. Texas Juvenile Justice Department

  12. TJJD Facilities • Statewide: • -6 hardware secure facilities • 3 closures in 2011 • -9 Halfway Houses

  13. Juvenile Justice in TX

  14. www.tyc.state.tx.us/research

  15. Youth Movement in System

  16. TJJD Youth • 89% Males • Median Age at Commitment: 16 • 84% of youth’s parents were never married, or divorced or separated • 43% come from families with histories of criminal behavior • 44% admitted gang members • 35% had >1 felony adjudication Caucasian Hispanic* African American • Country of Origin: Greatest percentage from Mexico, Honduras, El Salvador -TJJD, 2011

  17. Median grade completed- 8th grade • Median reading level- 6th grade • 35% special education eligible • 44% in need of mental health treatment • 38% had documented history of abuse/neglect • 72% in need of alcohol or other drug treatment

  18. Reasons for Commitment to TYC in FY 2009 • www.tyc.state.tx.us/research

  19. Reasons for Commitment 2009 2012 • Burglary-23% (334) • Aggravated Robbery-10% (152) • Aggravated Assault-9% (133) • Drug Offense-8% (118) • Simple Assault-8% (114) • Sexual Assault-7% (107) • Burglary-22% (190) • Simple Assault-11% (93) • Aggravated Assault-10% (85) • Aggravated Robbery-10% (82) • Sexual Assault-8% (70) • Drug Offense-6% (52)

  20. Prevalence of Mental Illness in the U.S. Juvenile Justice System 65-70% of youth meet criteria for > 1 disorder Shufelt & Cocozza, 2006; Teplin et al., 2006; Wasserman et al., 2002; Wasserman et al., 2004 Many enter the Juvenile Justice system without having been diagnosed or treated Studies examining rates of psychopathology have been inconsistent: Major affective disorders 5 to 88% Substance use disorders 20 to 88% Psychosis 12 to 45% Teplin et al, 2006

  21. Prevalence of Mental Illness in the Juvenile Justice System in the U.S. • Even higher rates of comorbidity for females • Studies range from 79-99% (virtually all females) • Females have higher rates of any single and comorbid psychiatric disorders including: • major depressive episodes • some anxiety disorders • PTSD • somatization disorders • borderline personality disorder • substance use disorder other than alcohol and marijuana • PTSD among youth in juvenile justice similar to youth in mental health and substance abuse systems (3-50%) BUT up to 8x higher than same aged youth in the community population • Veysey, 2003; Wasserman, et al., 2003; Grisso, 2004; Grisso & Underwood, 2004; Teplin et al., 2002, 2004; OJJDP, 2006

  22. Fazel, et al., 2008 Prevalence Studies: Recent Meta-analyses Colins, et al., 2010 15 studies using structured diagnostic interviews Multicountry (10), detained male adolescents (N=3401) 70% met criteria for >1 disorder Mean prevalence for CD-46.4%, SUD-45.1%, ODD 19.8%, ADHD-13.5%, MDD-12%; SAD-10.7%; PTSD-10%, psychotic disorders-1.4% • 25 psychiatric surveys • Multicountry (8), detained males (N=13,778) & females (N=2,972) • Mean prevalence for CD-52.8% both, ADHD-11.7% boys, 18.5% girls, MDD-10.6% boys/29.2% girls; psychotic disorders- 3% both

  23. Karnik et al., 2010 • 650 males/140 females • Incarcerated 9 months in California DJJ • Used SCID, DICA & SIDP-IV • Any psychiatric disorder: • Boys <16: 97% Boys >17: 98% • Girls < 16: 100% Girls > 17: 97%

  24. Unfortunate Reality • “ The juvenile justice system has become the default placement for many youth with mental health disorders who are not receiving appropriate psychological and psychiatric treatment in the community.”-Boesky, L. M. (2002) • “…the juvenile justice system is becoming the dumping ground for these kids.” –Cocozza, cited in Bender (2002)

  25. What is the Prevalence of Psychiatric Disorders Among Youth Incarcerated Statewide? How Does Texas Compare?

  26. Prevalence Study of Texas Juvenile Justice Incarcerated Population Study Period: January 1, 2004- December 31, 2008 Retrospective analysis of data from UTMB-CMC Electronic Medical Record & TYC Information System All youth committed to TYC secure facilities from 10-21 years of age Sample size of 11,603 youth -Harzke et al., 2012

  27. 94% had only one commitment during study period (5 years) Almost 66% not committed to TYC until age 16 or older 36% committed for violent offense Median length of sentence: 9 months Population Characteristics • Total population: 11,603 youth • 90.2% Male • 71.3% > 16 years at time of commitment • 34% African American & 42.6% Hispanic • Nearly half of first referred to Probation when <13 years • Average number of referrals:7.5 -Harzke et al., 2012

  28. Prevalence of Psychiatric Disorders Among TJJD Youth *excludes PTSD

  29. Comparable prevalence estimates to other samples of incarcerated youth • Much higher than estimates from youth in different juvenile justice settings (detention or probation) • Prevalence of any psychiatric disorder slightly higher among females (99 vs. 98%) • Substantially higher prevalence estimates among females for any depressive disorder, any adjustment disorder, any bipolar disorder, any anxiety disorder, & PTSD

  30. System Challenges • Expansive area-268,581 square miles • Units located in remote and underserved areas • Unified statewide service system • Shortage of qualified child providers • Increased outside entities/advocate involvement

  31. Our Approach • Statewide Electronic Medical Record • Centralized pharmacy • Telepsychiatry services • Telehealth HUBs • Secure facilities and Halfway Houses • Academic partnership with Psychiatry Department • Engage in initial conversation & gatekeeping

  32. Electronic Medical Record • On system-wide servers • Pearl – Web based • Evaluations • Progress notes • Consults • Medical care • Labs • Orders • Email • Scheduled Patients • System Reports

  33. Pharmacy Services

  34. Overview of Operations • Pharmacy procurement and distribution provided by UTMB Correctional Pharmacy statewide • Clinical pharmacy services and consultation • Medications prescribed, filled and distributed using computerized systems • Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee provides oversight • CMC Formulary • Disease Management Guidelines

  35. Medication Delivery System • Computerized ordering system (PRS) provides a template for each medication with normal dose and frequency to reduce order entry errors. • Computer system flags potential drug-drug interactions at the time of prescribing. • A copy of all current active medications placed in the patient’s EMR record so that each provider is aware of all medications being taken by the patient. • Access to automated prescribing system is restricted to licensed providers through use of identification security. Provider Order entry (Transmitted electronically to Pharmacy) Centralized Pharmacy reviews, dispenses and ships order (generally within 24 hour turn-around time) Medication order Received by the Facility Medication administered to patient

  36. Pharmacy Services • Strategies implemented to maximize pharmacy services: • Computerization (physician electronic order entry) • Centralization of drug distribution services • Automation of drug distribution services • Purchasing initiatives • Development of formulary management program

  37. Pharmacy Youth Services-FY 12

  38. Number of Prescriptions per Member per Year

  39. Telemedicine/Telepsychiatry • Response to system need • Tele-Health provides specialty care to correctional facilities in rural areas where providers are scarce and difficult to recruit • Quick and easy access to collaborating physicians and peers to discuss/staff challenging patients and situations • Allows for greater continuity of care • Cost effective alternative

  40. 6,623,366 under 18

  41. The Virtual Provider Office • Links providers with patients regardless of location • Uses the same telecommunications link as the electronic medical record system, limiting costs • Utilizes high resolution cameras to enhance diagnostic capabilities • Serves as a unified workplace for providers and resources

  42. Total TJJD CMC Healthcare Encounters-2012 ADP: 2008-2,468 2009-2,027 2010-1,695 2011-1,399 *optometry, orthopedic highest -TJJD, 2012

  43. Academic Partnerships • Collaboration/MOU with UTMB Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences since 2009 • Academic and clinical partnership • Specialized professional service • Child Psychiatry Faculty Providers and Supervisors • Child Psychiatry Fellows • Unique training opportunity • Recruitment effort

  44. Advocate/Outside Involvement Due to increased involvement by advocacy groups, parents, attorneys: • Gatekeeping efforts by Administration • Proactive engagement in initial conversation with advocacy groups • Education, information gathering • Parent/Guardian Notification • Creation of Clinical Case Managers-RNs • Point of contact for health care services received by youth • Coordination of care-record gathering, clinical staffings, MDTs, discharge planning

  45. Summary • Despite decrease in population size, continued increased need for mental health and other health services • Despite challenges, system must respond and provide quality health care • Technology and collaborative partnerships address needs and challenges of large systems

More Related