1 / 25

PI: Erol Tutumluer RA: Phillip Donovan

Analysis of NAPTF Trafficking Dynamic Response Data For Pavement Deformation Behavior. Center of Excellence for Airport Technology, CEAT. Research Progress and FY07 Tasks – January 30, 2007. PI: Erol Tutumluer RA: Phillip Donovan.

keith-cherry
Download Presentation

PI: Erol Tutumluer RA: Phillip Donovan

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Analysis of NAPTF Trafficking Dynamic Response Data For Pavement Deformation Behavior Center of Excellence for Airport Technology, CEAT Research Progress and FY07 Tasks – January 30, 2007 PI: Erol Tutumluer RA: Phillip Donovan

  2. Introduction • NAPTF designed to investigate NGA/pavement system interaction • Previous analysis found disturbing trends -- Wander caused downward deformation to be offset by upward deformation (shuffling of system elements) • May need improvements in our aggregate lab testing and modeling for permanent deformation

  3. Research Objectives • Detailed analysis of deformation trends • Goals • (1) Investigate deformation trends based on • load magnitudes and loading sequences (stress history and application effects) • trafficking speeds (load duration effects) • traffic directions (shear stress reversals) • gear spacing and gear/wheel interaction • wander positions and wander sequence effects • (2) Validate rutting models for unbound base and subbase

  4. Work Plan Status • Task I: Acquire NAPTF trafficking response data for the CC1 and CC3 test sections • Most data have been obtained • Some data not compiled yet • No data at all from LFC MDD sensors • CC3 trench data • Most sensors have limited amount of sensor records • Example: MFC 777 path sensor 1537, 16,000 events recorded only events 2800-4000 have sensor records

  5. Work Plan Status • Too much data in other cases • LFS sensor records 400+ data points • Cannot analyze in Excel (only 256 columns) • Only last 200 data points required • Access to NAPTF database during FAA meeting in April would be extremely helpful • Data download and verification of sensors

  6. Work Plan Status • Task II: Analyze NAPTF Trafficking Response Data for Individual Gear/Wheel Passes • Analysis of MFC 777 path data showing: • Effect of wander positions and wander • Effect of traffic direction

  7. Task II:Progress Made In 2006

  8. Task II:Progress Made In 2006

  9. Task II:Progress Made In 2006

  10. Task II:Progress Made In 2006 4 4 3 3 2 2 -3 -3 -2 -2 -4 -1 -4 -1 1 1 0 0

  11. 4 W-E 4 E-W 2 W-E 2 E-W -3 W-E -3 E-W 0 E-W 0 W-E Task II:Progress Made In 2006

  12. Task II:Progress Made In 2006 2 -2 -3 4 -4,4 -1 3 3 2 -3 1 -2 0 -1 -4 1 16,000 events 0

  13. Task II:Progress Made In 2006 -3,-2,2 4 4 3 -1 -4 1 3 0 2 -2 -3 -1 -4 4000 events 1 0

  14. Task II:Progress Made In 2006 -3,-2,2 4 4 3 -1, -4 3 1 2 0 -2 -3 -4 -1 1 0

  15. Work Plan Status • Task II: continued • Analysis of other sensors progressing • MFC - 747 • MFS – 747 (no 777 MDD data) • LFx – 777 and 747 • Individual layer residual and rebound response

  16. Work Plan Status • Task III: Analyze NAPTF trafficking response data for pavement loading until failure • To be evaluated after rutting analysis • Task IV: Identify and evaluate deformation trends in the CC1 and CC3 test sections • Progressing with Task II • Task V: Develop and Validate Realistic Granular Base/Subbase Deformation Models • To be evaluated after Tasks II-IV

  17. Future Research

  18. Future Research Task II:Continue analysis of NAPTF trafficking response data for individual gear/wheel passes • Reduce data to actual sensor movement --Must subtract sensor readings from the exact same sensor reading of the anchors • Issue 1: matching the sensor records from the anchor to the other sensors • Issue 2: limited capabilities of Excel

  19. NAPTF trafficking dynamic response Base/Subbase Contractive & Dilative Behavior

  20. Future Research Task IV: Identify and evaluate deformation trends in the CC1 and CC3 test sections • Based on Task II results, identify and quantify the trends • Task III: Analyze NAPTF trafficking response data for pavement loading until failure • Based on Task IV results, analyze data for failure

  21. Future Research Task V: Develop and Validate Realistic Granular Base/Subbase Deformation Models • Update Rutting model to include “normal” trafficking effects

  22. Any Questions?

More Related