1 / 22

Ultra-Peripheral Collisions at STAR

S T A R. Ultra-Peripheral Collisions at STAR. STAR Detector Ultra-Peripheral Collisions Triggers First results Coherent rho production Electron pair production Direct pion production. Janet Seger, Creighton University for the Collaboration.

keithrice
Download Presentation

Ultra-Peripheral Collisions at STAR

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. STAR Ultra-Peripheral Collisions at STAR • STAR Detector • Ultra-Peripheral Collisions • Triggers • First results • Coherent rho production • Electron pair production • Direct pion production Janet Seger, Creighton University for the Collaboration

  2. Silicon Vertex            Tracker Magnet Coils E-M Calorimeter Time Projection Chamber Trigger Barrel Electronics Platforms Forward Time Projection Chamber STAR Detector

  3. Central Gold-Gold Collisions at 130 GeV/nucleon • Minimum-bias Trigger: • Coincident neutrons in both zero-degree calorimeters • ~800,000 triggers (Au Au, 200GeV/nucleon, University of Frankfurt) Up to 2000 tracks/event

  4. Ultra-Peripheral Collisions Two nuclei ‘miss’ each other and interact via their photon fields at impact parameters b > 2RA • Mostly 2-track events • Coherent coupling to both nuclei • Nuclei may be mutually excited • Large background • Incoherent photo-nuclear interactions, Beam-gas events, Cosmic rays,Hadronic interactions (peripheral AA),Upstream interactions… •  Triggering is Crucial!

  5. Coherent Coupling Coupling Strength: • Photon  Z2 • ( Z for incoherent coupling to single nucleon) • Pomeron A4/3 to A 2  Cross sections are large Coherence condition: • Longitudinal momentum • pL < gh/RA ~ 3 GeV/c << p nuclei • Small Transverse momentum • pT < 2h/RA~ 50 MeV  Clear signature of coherent events; acceptance may be small

  6. e- Au g e+ g Au Photon-Photon Interactions: ggleptons, mesons • Purely electromagnetic • Exclusive process • Strong field QED Za~ 0.6 • Large cross section Z4a4 (33 kb at RHIC) • Acceptance/efficiency small Example: electron pair production

  7. Photonuclear interactions • Photon fluctuates to pair • pair can emerge as vector meson • r, w, F, J/y • Large cross section – 380 mb for r0 in Au collisions at 130 GeV • Two sub-channels– with and without nuclear excitation

  8. Au*+n Au g g r0 Au P Au*+n Nuclear Excitation Nuclei may exchange one or more separate photons and become mutually excited. Au+Au  Au*+Au* +r0 • Cross section factorizes • Decay of excited nuclei yields neutrons in Zero Degree Calorimeter

  9. Direct p+p - production p- p- r0 p+ • Two diagrams interfere • Constructive below M(r0); destructive above it • Well-studied with gp • greater for p+p- than for r0 • p+p- fraction should decrease as A increases p+ g g gA p+p- A gA r0A p+p- A

  10. No Interference Interference S. Klein and J. Nystrand, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84(2000)2330 Interference Fundamental Quantum Mechanics Can’t differentiate between projectile and target Expected Signal 2-slit interferometer! r, w, f, J/yhave negative parity: destructive interference at pT=0

  11. Ultra-Peripheral Collisions Trigger • Level 0 • Back-to-back hits in Central • Trigger Barrel • Coincidence • 1 North + 1 South hit • Veto on top + bottom • (reject cosmic rays) • Rate: 20-40 Hz • Level 3-online reconstruction • Vertex position • Charged multiplicity • Accepted 1-2 Hz • Data Set • ~ 7 hours of dedicated data collection • 30,000 triggers

  12. Pedestal Single neutron peak Reject events ADC>30 Reject events ADC>7 ZDC Signals for 2-track events • Ultra-Peripheral Trigger • Pedestal peak at ADC sum = 4 • Higher ADC values usually in east or west only (beam gas events) • Minimum Bias Trigger • Single neutron peak around ADC =9 • coincident in east and west • Higher ADC values from hadronic peripheral events Observe two different processes !

  13. Au*+n Au g r0 Au g r0 g P Au Au P Au*+n Observed with Peripheral Trigger: Au+Au  Au+Au +r0 Observed with Minimum-Bias Trigger: Au+Au  Au*+Au* +r0

  14. Cosmics Event Selection Criteria • Vertex within interaction region • |zvertex| < 200 cm and |x,yvertex| < 2 cm • Exactly 2 tracks with net charge zero • ZDC cuts • Opening angle < 3.0 rad • (reject cosmic background)

  15. Preliminary Signal region: pT<0.1 GeV Rho events with Peripheral Trigger • Au+AuAu+Au+r • Uncorrected • mpp spectrum peaks near r0 mass • peak at pT < 100 MeV/c • Clear evidence that production was coherent

  16. Signal region: pT<0.1 GeV Preliminary Rho events with Minimum-Bias Trigger • Au+AuAu*+Au*+r • Uncorrected • mpp spectrum peaks near r0 mass • peak at pT < 100 MeV/c • Clear evidence that production was coherent

  17. Preliminary STARlight Monte Carlo Simulation vs. data: r0 pt spectrum • STARlight Monte Carlo S.R. Klein and J. Nystrand, STAR Note 347 • Simulates rapidity, transverse momentum and angular distributions for photon-photon, photon-Pomeron and photon-meson interactions • Does not (yet) include interference, backgrounds, and full detector simulation • Min. Bias dataset • 0.62 GeV < mpp < 0.92 GeV • uncorrected Reasonable match between Monte Carlo and data

  18. • Min-bias data with two oppositely-charged tracks • Identified electrons Preliminary Analysis of e+e- Pairs • Select electrons from min-bias data: • p < 0.13 GeV • -0.2 < log(z) <0.3 Selected pairs show a peak at very low pT Coherent process Au+AuAu*+Au*+e++e-

  19. Preliminary r0 p+p- Set =0 for STAR Fit r0 mass lineshape ZEUS gp --> (r0 + p+p- )p STAR gAu --> (r0 + p+p- )Au Fit Data interference is significant p+ p- fraction is high (electron pairs have not been removed)

  20. Summary • We observe exclusive r0 production in both peripherally-triggered and minimum bias data sets  Observation of both interactions: Au + Au -> Au + Au + r0 Au + Au -> Au* + Au* + r0 • Peaks at low transverse momentum indicate both processes are coherent. • We observe interference between rho production and direct pion production. • We observe coherent electron-pair production. First observation of Ultra-Peripheral Collisions in heavy ion interactions

  21. Year 2001 Run • Full field (0.5 T) • Peripheral Trigger in parallel with Central • Better calibrations • May have some functionality from MWC • Acceptance at higher h • Better statistics  more channels

More Related