1 / 34

Searches for Vector Boson Scattering at the LHC

Searches for Vector Boson Scattering at the LHC. Aaron Webb Mentors: Al Goshaw, Andrea Bocci. LHC / ATLAS Introduction. The Large Hadron Collider accelerates protons to high energies and focuses them to head-on collisions. Several layers of detectors record the results

kelda
Download Presentation

Searches for Vector Boson Scattering at the LHC

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Searches for Vector Boson Scattering at the LHC Aaron Webb Mentors: Al Goshaw, Andrea Bocci

  2. LHC / ATLAS Introduction • The Large Hadron Collider accelerates protons to high energies and focuses them to head-on collisions. • Several layers of detectors record the results • Particle type, energy, and location are all recorded • Using data collected in 2012 • Center of mass energy 8 TeV • Integrated luminosity (cross section) of 20.3 fb-1 • σ ʃ L*dt= number of events produced • A Monte Carlo event generator, Sherpa, is used to simulate event collisions • Allows us to compare theory and data • Access to “truth” values – can compare to reconstructed data http://www.atlas.ch/photos/lhc.html

  3. Vector Boson Scattering (VBS) Introduction • A vector boson is a particle with spin 1 • photons, W+/- and Z bosons • VBS is when two vector bosons scatter off of one another • Vector Boson scattering allows us to: • Test electroweak symmetry breaking • Better understand the Higgs mechanism • Look for physics beyond the standard model

  4. Motivations • VBS can be used to study spontaneous electroweak symmetry breaking • Complete EWK symmetry is broken at low energies, replaced by EM subgroup • Believed to be a result of the Higgs mechanism • Non-unitarity of WW scattering • Without the Higgs, at high energies the probability of WW scattering becomes nonphysical (>1) EWK EM P >> 1 Unitarize WW scattering

  5. W± and ZBosons • Force carriers of the electroweak force • W can have a charge of +/-1, while the Z is neutral • Both are spin 1 • W and Z bosons bosons are massive (80.4 and 91.2 GeV), and short-lived (~10^-25 s) • Have to look at the decay products to study them • Use kinematic selection criteria to determine which particles (leptons) came from W or Z decay • isolate the relevant events, and reconstruct them • Use relativistic mechanics, conservation laws • E.g. W decays to 1 lepton, 1 neutrino • Look for events with a high energy lepton, and missing transverse energy of the neutrino

  6. ZgChannel • Z boson decays into a fermion and its antiparticle • In this study the muondecay channel is used p + p -> Z(m+m-) + g + 2 jets • Things we’re looking for: • two high energy jets • Two oppositely charged muons • High Pt photon • Studying the leptonic decay channel • Z->mumu • Others in the group studying electron and muon channel, as well as W lepton channel

  7. Et=37 GeV e  e e M(e,e) =91.2 GeV  Et=30 GeV e  e Et=51 GeV e Example of ISR event http://www.atlas.ch/photos/lhc.html 7

  8. Backgrounds • QCD processes (i.e. strong force interactions) represent the main background of this channel • Same final state as VBS • Very large compared to signal • Effectively differentiating between signal and background is essential Example QCD Process VBS Process with the same final state

  9. MVA – Multi-variant Analysis • Multi-variant analysis techniques are used to optimize signal efficiency with respect to a given background • Multi-dimensional methods can often allow for better background separation than looking at single variables individually • TMVA is an MVA program within a root environment • Giving TMVA a signal sample and a background sample will “train” it • TMVA develops a weighting algorithm • Each event is given a probability of being signal vs. background

  10. Image generated by Kushal Byatnal in TMVA

  11. VBS/QCD Comparison • Comparisons can tell us which variables to consider in the MVA analysis • Differences can be used to differentiate between signal and background Photon Pt (GeV) Pt(m+m- )/Pt(g ) GeV M(m+m- ) GeV

  12. GeV GeV

  13. Event Classification • Trying to see which processes are most common, and therefore most relevant • Looking at final state quarks • Use Sherpa MC’s truth level data to classify final state quarks • Pdg: particle classification codes • Negatives correspond to antiparticles (e.g. -2 is ū)

  14. Final state Quark comparison • Truth level information used to identify particles • Gluons account for a major fraction of QCD events • Looking into whether we can distinguish quark jets from gluon jets VBS QCD

  15. Going Forward • Study still in early phases • Analyze full MC sample will next, followed by the real data set • Use MVA to develop QCD/VBS discrimination • Look for more variables to differentiate between VBS and background processes • Pursue polarization studies • Potential source of QCD/VBS discrimination • Can be used to study Z boson structures and couplings

  16. Summary • VBS allows us to study central features of the standard model • Test couplings that are sensitive to the predictions of electroweak symmetry breaking • Better understand the Higgs mechanism behind EWKSB • Search for anomalous gauge couplings indicative of physics beyond the standard model • E.g. direct coupling of the photon to the Z would be indicative of some internal structure within the Z • Despite large backgrounds, lepton VBS channels appear to be good candidates for studying these key features of the SM, and search for new physics

  17. References • Kuss, I., and E. Nuss. "Gauge Boson Pair Production at the LHC: Anomalous Couplings and Vector Boson Scattering." The European Physical Journal C 4.4 (1998): 641-60. Web. • Djouadi, Abdelhak. "The Anatomy of Electroweak Symmetry Breaking." Physics Reports 457.1-4 (2008): 1-216. Web. • Feynman Diagrams created using JaxoDraw

  18. Backup Slides

  19. Motivations • Higgs is necessary for massive vector particles (W and Z bosons) • explain their mass (extra DOF in longitudinal direction) • Goldstone’s theorem: “A theory with spontaneous symmetry breaking must have a massless scalar particle in its spectrum.” • This massless scalar particle is a Higgs (not the SM Higgs) • spontaneous symmetry breaking in EWK • Non-unitarity of WW scattering • Cross section calculated from Feynman Diagrams violates unitarity • Unitarized by the Higgs • Without the Higgs, at high energies the probablity of WW scattering becomes infinite

  20. ATLAS Detector • Muon detection: • Tracking detector • Charged particles bend in the magnetic field • Muon chambers • Photon detection: • Electromagnetic calorimeter

  21. Z Boson Information • Branching Ratios • W: • Electron/neutrino: 10.46% • Muon/neutrino: 10.5% • Tau/neutrino: 10.75% • Hadrons: 68.32% • Z: • 20.5% neutrinos • 10.2% Leptons • 3.4% for each, electrons, muons and taus • 69.2% hadrons

  22. Lepton Selection • Require two oppositely charged muons • Et > 25 GeV • |η| < 2.4 • Lorentz invariant angle between the beam and the particle • Muon-Muon separation ΔR > 0.3 • Measured as • PtCone30/Pt < 0.15 • Isolation cut • Muon+muoninvariant mass > 40 GeV • Misc. corrections Pseudorapidity as a function of θ • η = -ln[tan(θ/2)]

  23. Photon Selection • Et > 15 GeV • Et cone < 4 GeV • Isolation cut • |η| < 2.37 • Photon-Muon separation ΔR > 0.7 • Require the photon to be well-identified and isolated from other particles • Narrow energy cluster, with no/small energy leakage into hadronic calorimeter • Cut on shower shape variables to discriminate  from jets and 0 • 0 -> g+g

  24. Jet Selection • pt > 30 GeV • |η| < 4.5 • jet vertex fraction cut • check overlap with photons • check overlap with electrons • Misc. Corrections • veto jets if is LOOSERBAD • BCH cleaning

  25. Event Selection • Difference in jets selection is unsurprising • Different pileup weights come from different MC generations (MC12a vs. MC12 b) • Different mu values • Unexpected differences between the object selection • Have to look at kinematics in more detail

  26. Object Selection • Major differences: • Pt cut (26% vs. 34%) • Z0 (0.23% vs. 0.71%) • Eta (0.72% vs. 1.11%)

  27. Major differences: • Photon: • Ambiguity resolver (0.56% vs. 0) • Loose ID cut (1.39% vs. 0.39%) • Jets: • Pt cut (72% vs. 89%) • LOOSERBAD (0.99% vs. 0.45%) • BCH cleaning (0.58% vs. 0.16%)

  28. Final state Quark comparison • Truth level – before any cuts • Cuts used: • ISR • Invariant mass > 182 GeV • dr_egv>0.2 && abs(eta_gv)<2.47 && abs(eta_ev)<2.7 && abs(eta_nv)<2.7 • Invariant mass jj > 500 GeV • JJ invariant mass cut not applied for QCD • Only 2 events within the QCD sample pass VBS QCD

  29. Top 10 Processes • Plan to look at the most common events • Find out what processes they correspond to • Gluons account for a major fraction of QCD events • Looking into whether we can distinguish quark jets from gluon jets

  30. Polarization Studies • The Z boson has spin 1 • It can be polarized in a particular direction • Preference for spin in a particular direction could be indicative of anomalous gauge couplings • E.g. coupling to the photon • May also be useful in differentiating VBS from QCD Anomalous gauge couplings

  31. Process • Angular distribution of decay products, (m+m-), is determined by the polarization • By determining the angular distribution we can reconstruct the polarization of the Z • Lorentz transform the 4-vectors of the 2 muons into the rest frame of the Z • Plot the angular distribution of the 2 muons

  32. Preliminary Results • SM predicts isotropy in cos(θ) • fr is spin in the direction of travel, fl spin in the opposite direction, f0 spin perpendicular • Plot of cosθ is similar to predicted result (isotropy) • Excess at the extremes cosθ

  33. MC Samples • VBS Sample: • /eos/atlas/atlascerngroupdisk/phys-sm/Vgamma_skim/CutFlow/NTUP_SMWZ.01413658._000001_zmumuVBS.root.1 • QCD Sample: • /eos/atlas/atlascerngroupdisk/phys-sm/Vgamma_skim/CutFlow/NTUP_SMWZ.01110562._000001_mumugamma.root.1 • Generator Cuts: • Leptons: pT > 15 GeV, M(lepton, lepton) > 20 GeV • Jets: pT > 15 GeV, DeltaR(jet, jet) > 1.0

More Related