290 likes | 454 Views
R evised SWIRE photometric redshift. Author: Michael Rowan-Robinson et al.2012 Present: Xuechen Zheng Date: 04-17-2013. Introduction. SWIRE survey consisted of 49 deg2 of sky surveyed by Spitzer at 3.6, 4.5, 5.8, 8.0, 24.0, 70.0 and 160.0 μ m .
E N D
Revised SWIRE photometric redshift Author: Michael Rowan-Robinson et al.2012 Present: XuechenZheng Date: 04-17-2013
Introduction • SWIRE survey consisted of 49 deg2 of sky surveyed by Spitzer at 3.6, 4.5, 5.8, 8.0, 24.0, 70.0 and 160.0 μm. • Rowan-Robinson et al.(2008) reported the SWIRE Photometric Redshift Catalogue(SPRC) • New optical and near-infrared data from several surveys make it worthwhile revisiting SWIRE photometric redshifts • Additional bands together with the improved photometry resulted in a reduction in the number of catastrophic outliers and improved rmsvalues • The new catalogues comprise 1 009 607 redshifts, out of a total of 1 066 879 in the original SPRC.
Aperture corrections • Difficulty: the differences in distant keep us from applying same template for galaxies( integrated SED required) • Solutions: • A.use curve of growth fitted to photometry derived in a series of apertures of different sizes (example: Kron and Petrosianintegrated magnitudes, mag-auto provided in sextractor) • Results: uncertainty of the estimation(mainly comes from different contributions of sky photon noise) cause poor results for photo-z • B. start from photometry derived in a single small aperture in each band, and then apply an aperture correction derived in a single chosen band to all the bands.
Optical data • Define: (r is measured in a 2 arcsecaperture, WFC ‘aper2’, and have been PSF aperture corrected) • -5.0<delmag<-0.10, apply aperture correction • -0.10<delmag, considered to be PSs within uncertainties • -5.0>delmag, considered to be erroneous determinations of integrated magnitude • In the 2nd and 3rd conditions, aperture correction was set to zero.
For SDSS optical data: • no sign of any correlation of r(SDSS, model) − r(WFC, mag-auto) with • SDSS model magnitude is estimating approximately the same total magnitude as the WFC mag-auto • However, wide dispersion exists, which harms photo-z estimation • use WFC mag-auto, because WFC provides more data alone with more accurate magnitudes.
Other option for aperture correction • led to slightly worse photo-z result Stick to unless mag-auto is not available
Near infrared data • For 2MASS data: • For UKIDSS data: • They are well correlated to , but result in worse photo-z solution • Therefore, use as aperture correction.
Result: use as aperture work well in removing the correlation of color with
UKIDSS-IRAC comparison shows problem that harms the photo-z estimation • Reason? • IRAC fluxes give good consistency with the aperture-corrected optical magnitudes • Therefore, problem lies with overestimation of the J, H and especially K brightness for extended galaxies • Solution: change the aperture correction • New problem: worse photo-z results • Suggestion: revise the templates in the near-infrared
Photometric Redshifts • Photometric redshifts method: • Two-pass template based on six galaxy (11 in the second pass) and three AGN templates. • First pass: empirical galaxy templates + star formation history • Second pass: four infrared SED types + dust extinction • Torus component prevents the use of near-infrared data before new approach developed
Results of QSOs • Fact 1: SPRC required an object to be flagged as stellar to consider a QSO template, which led to the missing of some QSOs • Fact 2: allow a QSO template option to all galaxies will cause mistakenly high redshifts to too many galaxies • Solution: allow the SDSS stellar flag to override the WFC flag where they disagree and this allows a few more quasars through
Salvato et al. introduced two innovations: • 1. track the variability of quasars and apply an appropriate correction to the photometry • 2.they use templates that include a range of contributions from AGN dust tori • Lack of information to track QSO variability, they explored the idea of adding a range of AGN dust tori strengths to our QSO templates during the second pass, and then using the 1.25–8 μm data in the redshift solution. • Comparison of the results: • For at least 11 photometric bands, reduced χ2 <3, r<21.5, rms=9.3%, outlier=9.3% • Salvato, with 30 bands, rms=1.2% for I<22.5, outlier=6.3%
Reasons for poor χ2 • Photometric redshift estimates get worse as χ2increases and some sources have very large χ2 • Main reasons: • 1. contamination by stars • 2. poor photometry • 3. QSOs misclassified as galaxies • 4. QSOs with too high dust extinction
After the removal of stars, use color-color diagrams and SEDs plot to exam the rest sample with χ2>7 • Conclusions for QSOs: • 1. most of the χ2>7 objects are stars with slightly higher 3.6 μm fluxes than the stellar sequence • 2. A few are QSOs with too high dust extinction • 3. others are objects with poor photometry • Conclusions for galaxies: • 1. 10% are mistaken QSOs • 2. some are stars with slightly higher 3.6 μm fluxes than the stellar sequence • 3. rest are the problem of photometry
Revised SPRC • Object amount: 818 555 • 3% of the SPRC objects did not find a match in fusion catalogue mainly because the latter omitted 24μm only source • Further 1% failed to achieved a redshift solution because of the lack of photometric bands or large χ2 • Along with objects in the area with no new data, the total number of redshifts is 1 009 607 • New catalogue delivers photometric redshift for 26 288 quasars
Left-hand: histogram of number of bands used in estimating photometric redshifts in revised catalogue (solid line) compared with SPRC (broken line). Right: histogram of redshifts in revised SPRC (red: galaxies, blue: QSOs, x 10)
Discussion of the improvement Revised SPRC should be useful for improved studies of the infrared extragalactic population and surveys carried out in all SWIRE fields.
Reference • Rowan-Robinson et al., 2013, MNRAS, 428, 1958–1967 • Thanks!